Current State and Proposal of Best Practices of Standardized Patients for Spanish-Language Objective Structured Clinical Encounters in US Medical Schools.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Reniell X Iñiguez, José A Figueroa Narváez, Lisa C Diamond, Steven E Gregorich, Leah Karliner, Javier González, Cristina Pérez-Cordón, Tiffany M Shin, Karen Izquierdo, Pilar Ortega
{"title":"Current State and Proposal of Best Practices of Standardized Patients for Spanish-Language Objective Structured Clinical Encounters in US Medical Schools.","authors":"Reniell X Iñiguez, José A Figueroa Narváez, Lisa C Diamond, Steven E Gregorich, Leah Karliner, Javier González, Cristina Pérez-Cordón, Tiffany M Shin, Karen Izquierdo, Pilar Ortega","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medical Spanish programs commonly engage Spanish-speaking standardized patients (SPs) for communication skills assessment, yet no studies address SP recruitment, selection, or training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We sent questionnaires to medical Spanish faculty at 20 US medical schools to gauge their practices in recruiting and selecting Spanish-language SPs. We invited faculty to distribute a separate questionnaire to Spanish-language SPs to gather SP language abilities, training, and experience. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. When available, we reviewed SP video encounters to formally assess participating SPs' linguistic performance using the SP Oral Language Observation Matrix, a rating tool adapted from the Physician Oral Language Observation Matrix to assess oral medical Spanish proficiency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty percent of faculty (16/20) responded. Standardized patient recruitment sources included institutional English-language SPs, Hispanic student groups and professional organizations, communities, and language professionals. Faculty-reported strategies to determine language readiness included interviewing SP candidates in Spanish and asking them to self-rate language skills using a validated scale. Fifteen SPs (54%, 15/28) from 5 schools responded to the SP questionnaire, and one third (5/15) reported that their Spanish was not assessed before being selected as an SP. In addition, one third (5/15) did not receive any initial training before performing a medical Spanish case. Raters assessed 11 different SPs using the SP Oral Language Observation Matrix, and 6 were rated as linguistically \"ready\" for the SP role.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current approaches to recruitment, training, and language assessment of SPs vary. We propose strategies to ensure that medical Spanish encounters authentically reflect Spanish-speaking patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":"e117-e126"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000756","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Medical Spanish programs commonly engage Spanish-speaking standardized patients (SPs) for communication skills assessment, yet no studies address SP recruitment, selection, or training.

Methods: We sent questionnaires to medical Spanish faculty at 20 US medical schools to gauge their practices in recruiting and selecting Spanish-language SPs. We invited faculty to distribute a separate questionnaire to Spanish-language SPs to gather SP language abilities, training, and experience. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. When available, we reviewed SP video encounters to formally assess participating SPs' linguistic performance using the SP Oral Language Observation Matrix, a rating tool adapted from the Physician Oral Language Observation Matrix to assess oral medical Spanish proficiency.

Results: Eighty percent of faculty (16/20) responded. Standardized patient recruitment sources included institutional English-language SPs, Hispanic student groups and professional organizations, communities, and language professionals. Faculty-reported strategies to determine language readiness included interviewing SP candidates in Spanish and asking them to self-rate language skills using a validated scale. Fifteen SPs (54%, 15/28) from 5 schools responded to the SP questionnaire, and one third (5/15) reported that their Spanish was not assessed before being selected as an SP. In addition, one third (5/15) did not receive any initial training before performing a medical Spanish case. Raters assessed 11 different SPs using the SP Oral Language Observation Matrix, and 6 were rated as linguistically "ready" for the SP role.

Conclusions: Current approaches to recruitment, training, and language assessment of SPs vary. We propose strategies to ensure that medical Spanish encounters authentically reflect Spanish-speaking patients.

美国医学院西班牙语客观结构化临床接触标准化患者的最佳实践现状和建议。
引言:西班牙语医学项目通常会让讲西班牙语的标准化患者(SP)参与沟通技能评估,但没有研究涉及SP的招募、选择或培训。方法:我们向20所美国医学院的西班牙语医学教师发送了问卷,以评估他们在招聘和选择西班牙语专业学生方面的做法。我们邀请教师向西班牙语专业学生分发一份单独的问卷,以收集专业学生的语言能力、培训和经验。我们使用描述性统计和定性内容分析来分析数据。在可用的情况下,我们审查了SP视频会面,以使用SP口语观察矩阵正式评估参与SP的语言表现,该评估工具改编自医师口语观察矩阵,用于评估医学西班牙语口语水平。结果:80%的教师(16/20)做出了回应。标准化的患者招募来源包括机构英语SP、西班牙裔学生团体和专业组织、社区和语言专业人员。教员们报告说,确定语言准备程度的策略包括用西班牙语面试SP候选人,并要求他们使用经验证的量表对语言技能进行自我评分。来自5所学校的15名SP(54%,15/28)对SP问卷做出了回应,三分之一(5/15)的学生报告称,在被选为SP之前,他们的西班牙语没有得到评估。此外,三分一(5/15。评分者使用SP口语观察矩阵评估了11种不同的SP,其中6种被评为在语言上“准备好”担任SP角色。结论:目前SP的招聘、培训和语言评估方法各不相同。我们提出了一些策略,以确保西班牙语医疗遭遇真实地反映西班牙语患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信