Hand preference trajectories as predictors of language outcomes above and beyond SES: Infant patterns explain more variance than toddler patterns at 5 years of age

IF 2.8 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Kaityn Contino, Julie M. Campbell, Emily C. Marcinowski, George F. Michel, Michelle L. Ramos, Stefany Coxe, Timothy Hayes, Eliza L. Nelson
{"title":"Hand preference trajectories as predictors of language outcomes above and beyond SES: Infant patterns explain more variance than toddler patterns at 5 years of age","authors":"Kaityn Contino,&nbsp;Julie M. Campbell,&nbsp;Emily C. Marcinowski,&nbsp;George F. Michel,&nbsp;Michelle L. Ramos,&nbsp;Stefany Coxe,&nbsp;Timothy Hayes,&nbsp;Eliza L. Nelson","doi":"10.1002/icd.2468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Prior studies found that hand preference trajectories predict preschool language outcomes. However, this approach has been limited to examining bimanual manipulation in toddlers. It is not known whether hand preference during infancy for acquiring objects (i.e., reach-to-grasp) similarly predicts childhood language ability. The current study explored this motor-language developmental cascade in 90 children. Hand preference for acquiring objects was assessed monthly from 6 to 14 months, and language skill was assessed at 5 years. Latent class growth analysis identified three infant hand preference classes: left, early right and late right. Infant hand preference classes predicted 5-year language skills. Children in the left and early right classes, who were categorized as having a consistent hand preference, had higher expressive and receptive language scores relative to children in the inconsistent late right class. Consistent classes did not differ from each other on language outcomes. Infant hand preference patterns explained more variance for expressive and receptive language relative to previously reported toddler hand preference patterns, above and beyond socio-economic status. Results suggest that hand preference, measured at different time points across development using a trajectory approach, is reliably linked to later language.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Hand preference trajectories reliably predict preschool language above and beyond SES.</li>\n \n <li>Infants with a consistent hand preference for reaching had greater language skills at 5 years.</li>\n \n <li>Infant hand preference explained more variance in language than toddler hand preference.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47820,"journal":{"name":"Infant and Child Development","volume":"33 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant and Child Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/icd.2468","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior studies found that hand preference trajectories predict preschool language outcomes. However, this approach has been limited to examining bimanual manipulation in toddlers. It is not known whether hand preference during infancy for acquiring objects (i.e., reach-to-grasp) similarly predicts childhood language ability. The current study explored this motor-language developmental cascade in 90 children. Hand preference for acquiring objects was assessed monthly from 6 to 14 months, and language skill was assessed at 5 years. Latent class growth analysis identified three infant hand preference classes: left, early right and late right. Infant hand preference classes predicted 5-year language skills. Children in the left and early right classes, who were categorized as having a consistent hand preference, had higher expressive and receptive language scores relative to children in the inconsistent late right class. Consistent classes did not differ from each other on language outcomes. Infant hand preference patterns explained more variance for expressive and receptive language relative to previously reported toddler hand preference patterns, above and beyond socio-economic status. Results suggest that hand preference, measured at different time points across development using a trajectory approach, is reliably linked to later language.

Highlights

  • Hand preference trajectories reliably predict preschool language above and beyond SES.
  • Infants with a consistent hand preference for reaching had greater language skills at 5 years.
  • Infant hand preference explained more variance in language than toddler hand preference.
手偏好轨迹是SES以上语言结果的预测因素:婴儿模式比5岁时的幼儿模式解释更多的差异 年龄
先前的研究发现,手的偏好轨迹可以预测学前语言的结果。然而,这种方法仅限于检查学步儿童的双手操作。目前尚不清楚婴儿时期对获取物体的手偏好(即伸手抓东西)是否能类似地预测儿童的语言能力。目前的研究对90名儿童的运动语言发展级联进行了探索。从6日到14日,每月对获取物体的手偏好进行评估 月,语言技能在5岁时进行评估 年。潜在类别增长分析确定了三个婴儿的手偏好类别:左、右早期和右晚期。婴儿的手偏好课程预测了5年的语言技能。左班和右班早期的儿童被归类为具有一致的手偏好,与右班后期不一致的儿童相比,他们的语言表达和接受得分更高。一致的类在语言结果上没有差异。婴儿的手偏好模式解释了与先前报道的幼儿手偏好模式相比,表达和接受语言的差异更大,超出了社会经济地位。研究结果表明,使用轨迹法在发育过程中的不同时间点测量的手偏好与后来的语言有可靠的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infant and Child Development
Infant and Child Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Infant and Child Development publishes high quality empirical, theoretical and methodological papers addressing psychological development from the antenatal period through to adolescence. The journal brings together research on: - social and emotional development - perceptual and motor development - cognitive development - language development atypical development (including conduct problems, anxiety and depressive conditions, language impairments, autistic spectrum disorders, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信