Participant Satisfaction in a Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Intervention for Midlife Black Women.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1177/01939459231208420
Holly J Jones, Melinda Butsch Kovacic, Patricia Bacchus, Wala'a Almallah, Tamilyn Bakas
{"title":"Participant Satisfaction in a Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Intervention for Midlife Black Women.","authors":"Holly J Jones, Melinda Butsch Kovacic, Patricia Bacchus, Wala'a Almallah, Tamilyn Bakas","doi":"10.1177/01939459231208420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Midlife Black women suffer disproportionately from cardiovascular disease and are 65% more likely to die following a cardiac event compared with White women. Recruitment and retention of midlife Black women in clinical trials has been historically low. The culturally tailored Midlife Black Women's Stress Reduction and Wellness (B-SWELL) intervention was codeveloped with the community and designed to lower cardiovascular disease risk in midlife Black women.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to assess participant satisfaction in the randomized feasibility trial of the B-SWELL intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A feasibility trial comparing the B-SWELL to a wellness intervention was conducted in the winter and spring of 2021 in compliance with pandemic research protocols. An adapted survey tool was used to rate satisfaction with the intervention and its technology using a Likert-type scale (1 [strongly disagree] to 5 [strongly agree]). Survey subscales assessed usefulness, ease, and acceptability of the intervention(s).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Randomization yielded no statistical demographic differences (N = 48). Satisfaction for the interventions was high in both the B-SWELL and Wellness intervention groups with mean scores of 4.57 and 4.56, respectively. Mean scores for technology were 4.49 for the B-SWELL and 4.47 for the Wellness group. Subscales were also rated highly. Narrative responses were positively aligned with satisfaction scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results support use of cultural adaptation and community participatory methods to develop and deliver interventions targeted to at-risk populations. Culturally adapted interventions designed in collaboration with the community have greater authenticity, increasing the potential for higher recruitment, retention, and participant satisfaction of underrepresented populations. The trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04404478).</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459231208420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Midlife Black women suffer disproportionately from cardiovascular disease and are 65% more likely to die following a cardiac event compared with White women. Recruitment and retention of midlife Black women in clinical trials has been historically low. The culturally tailored Midlife Black Women's Stress Reduction and Wellness (B-SWELL) intervention was codeveloped with the community and designed to lower cardiovascular disease risk in midlife Black women.

Objectives: We sought to assess participant satisfaction in the randomized feasibility trial of the B-SWELL intervention.

Methods: A feasibility trial comparing the B-SWELL to a wellness intervention was conducted in the winter and spring of 2021 in compliance with pandemic research protocols. An adapted survey tool was used to rate satisfaction with the intervention and its technology using a Likert-type scale (1 [strongly disagree] to 5 [strongly agree]). Survey subscales assessed usefulness, ease, and acceptability of the intervention(s).

Results: Randomization yielded no statistical demographic differences (N = 48). Satisfaction for the interventions was high in both the B-SWELL and Wellness intervention groups with mean scores of 4.57 and 4.56, respectively. Mean scores for technology were 4.49 for the B-SWELL and 4.47 for the Wellness group. Subscales were also rated highly. Narrative responses were positively aligned with satisfaction scores.

Conclusions: Results support use of cultural adaptation and community participatory methods to develop and deliver interventions targeted to at-risk populations. Culturally adapted interventions designed in collaboration with the community have greater authenticity, increasing the potential for higher recruitment, retention, and participant satisfaction of underrepresented populations. The trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04404478).

参与者对中年黑人妇女心血管疾病预防干预的满意度。
背景:中年黑人女性患心血管疾病的比例过高,与白人女性相比,死于心脏事件的可能性高出65%。临床试验中中年黑人女性的招募和保留率一直处于历史低位。文化定制的中年黑人女性减压与健康(B-SWELL)干预措施是与社区共同开发的,旨在降低中年黑人女性患心血管疾病的风险。目的:我们试图在B-SWELL干预的随机可行性试验中评估参与者的满意度。方法:根据流行病研究方案,在2021年冬春季进行了一项将B-SWELL与健康干预进行比较的可行性试验。采用Likert型量表(1[强烈反对]至5[强烈同意]),使用一种经过调整的调查工具对干预及其技术的满意度进行评分。调查分量表评估了干预的有效性、易用性和可接受性。结果:随机分组没有统计学统计学差异(N=48)。B-SWELL和Wellness干预组对干预措施的满意度都很高,平均得分分别为4.57和4.56。B-SWELL组的技术平均得分为4.49,Wellness组为4.47。子规模也得到了很高的评价。叙述性回答与满意度得分呈正相关。结论:研究结果支持使用文化适应和社区参与方法来制定和提供针对高危人群的干预措施。与社区合作设计的适应文化的干预措施具有更大的真实性,增加了代表性不足人群更高的招募、保留和参与者满意度的潜力。该试验在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04404478)上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信