Japanese Public Health Concerns in Treaty-Port Manchuria

IF 0.7 Q3 HISTORY
B. Sewell
{"title":"Japanese Public Health Concerns in Treaty-Port Manchuria","authors":"B. Sewell","doi":"10.3138/cjh-57-1-2021-0113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Scholars often portray colonial medicine either as exemplifying the triumph of progress or as a means of expanding imperial authority. Adding to these views a consideration of the range of activities present on the ground reveals activities consistent with both perspectives, but points also to limitations inherent in perceiving these efforts in these two ways. A more focused view also acknowledges the inherently abusive side of the colonial project, underscoring the potential to become categorically worse should the historical context shift. The Japanese imperialist effort in Manchuria in the first half of the twentieth century exhibits this range clearly, resulting as it did in particularly extreme behaviour.Résumé:Les chercheurs décrivent souvent la médecine coloniale soit comme un exemple du triomphe du progrès, soit comme un moyen d'étendre l'autorité impériale. Outre ces points de vue, l'examen de l'éventail des activités présentes sur le terrain révèle des activités compatibles avec les deux visions, mais il souligne également les limites inhérentes à la perception de ces efforts sous ces deux angles. Une analyse plus ciblée reconnaît le côté intrinsèquement abusif du projet colonial tout en soulignant la capacité de ce dernier à devenir catégoriquement pire si le contexte historique change. Les efforts impérialistes du Japon en Mandchourie au cours de la première moitié du vingtième siècle illustrent parfaitement ce tableau, donnant à voir des comportements particulièrement extrêmes.","PeriodicalId":43085,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of History-Annales Canadiennes d Histoire","volume":"57 1","pages":"111 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of History-Annales Canadiennes d Histoire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cjh-57-1-2021-0113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Scholars often portray colonial medicine either as exemplifying the triumph of progress or as a means of expanding imperial authority. Adding to these views a consideration of the range of activities present on the ground reveals activities consistent with both perspectives, but points also to limitations inherent in perceiving these efforts in these two ways. A more focused view also acknowledges the inherently abusive side of the colonial project, underscoring the potential to become categorically worse should the historical context shift. The Japanese imperialist effort in Manchuria in the first half of the twentieth century exhibits this range clearly, resulting as it did in particularly extreme behaviour.Résumé:Les chercheurs décrivent souvent la médecine coloniale soit comme un exemple du triomphe du progrès, soit comme un moyen d'étendre l'autorité impériale. Outre ces points de vue, l'examen de l'éventail des activités présentes sur le terrain révèle des activités compatibles avec les deux visions, mais il souligne également les limites inhérentes à la perception de ces efforts sous ces deux angles. Une analyse plus ciblée reconnaît le côté intrinsèquement abusif du projet colonial tout en soulignant la capacité de ce dernier à devenir catégoriquement pire si le contexte historique change. Les efforts impérialistes du Japon en Mandchourie au cours de la première moitié du vingtième siècle illustrent parfaitement ce tableau, donnant à voir des comportements particulièrement extrêmes.
满洲通商口岸的日本公共卫生问题
摘要:学者们经常将殖民医学描述为进步胜利的例证或扩张帝国权威的手段。除了这些观点之外,对实地活动范围的考虑揭示了符合这两种观点的活动,但也指出以这两种方式看待这些努力所固有的局限性。一个更集中的观点也承认殖民项目固有的滥用的一面,强调如果历史背景发生变化,可能会变得更糟。二十世纪上半叶,日本帝国主义在满洲的所作所为清楚地表明了这一范围,导致了其极端的行为。rcv:Les chercheurs dcv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv cv。我们的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是,我的观点是。一个分析加上cible - cible - cn - cn - cn - cn - cn - cn - cn - cn - cn - cn - cn - cn - cn - cn - cn - cn - cn - cn - cn - cn - cn - cn - cn - cn - cn - cn - cn - cn在日本和日本的学习中,日本和日本的学习都是非常重要的,因为日本和日本的学习都是非常重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of History/Annales canadiennes d’histoire (CJH/ACH), published by University of Toronto Press, is a peer-reviewed journal of general history publishing in both English and French. Geared to all professional historians, as well as to anyone interested in historical scholarship, it features articles and reviews by experts, and invites contributions from all areas of history. The journal has resisted the trend toward increased specialization and offers an excellent way to keep up with developments across the discipline. The CJH/ACH publishes three issues annually in spring, fall, and winter. While the content of our issues varies seasonally, each issue may contain a maximum of four articles, one or two historiographical review articles, and approximately forty book reviews, including one or two longer “feature reviews,” which typically consider one or two books in somewhat greater depth. Our winter issue regularly features a guest editor and focuses on a specific theme or topic of their choosing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书