The Scholarship of Engagement.

Q4 Social Sciences
E. Boyer
{"title":"The Scholarship of Engagement.","authors":"E. Boyer","doi":"10.2307/3824459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goals were rooted in practical reality and aimed toward useful ends. In the 1940s the GI Bill brought eight million veterans back to campus, which sparked in this country a revolution of rising expectations. May I whisper that professors were not at the forefront urging the GI Bill; this initiative came from Congress. Many academics, in fact, questioned the wisdom of inviting GIs to campus; after all, these men hadn't passed the SATs-they'd simply gone off to war, and what did they know except survival? The story gets even grimmer. I read some years ago that the dean of admissions at one of the wellknown institutions in the country opposed the GIs because, he argued, many of them would be married; they would bring baby carriages to campus, and even contaminate the young undergraduates with bad ideas at that pristine institution. I think he knew little about GIs and even less about the undergraduates at his own college. But putting that resistance aside, the point is largely made that the universities joined in an absolutely spectacular experiment, in a cultural commitment to rising expectationsand what was for the GIs a privilege became for their children and grandchildren an absolute right. And there's no turning back. Almost coincidentally, Secretary of State","PeriodicalId":37931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement","volume":"20 1","pages":"15-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/3824459","citationCount":"1394","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3824459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1394

Abstract

The goals were rooted in practical reality and aimed toward useful ends. In the 1940s the GI Bill brought eight million veterans back to campus, which sparked in this country a revolution of rising expectations. May I whisper that professors were not at the forefront urging the GI Bill; this initiative came from Congress. Many academics, in fact, questioned the wisdom of inviting GIs to campus; after all, these men hadn't passed the SATs-they'd simply gone off to war, and what did they know except survival? The story gets even grimmer. I read some years ago that the dean of admissions at one of the wellknown institutions in the country opposed the GIs because, he argued, many of them would be married; they would bring baby carriages to campus, and even contaminate the young undergraduates with bad ideas at that pristine institution. I think he knew little about GIs and even less about the undergraduates at his own college. But putting that resistance aside, the point is largely made that the universities joined in an absolutely spectacular experiment, in a cultural commitment to rising expectationsand what was for the GIs a privilege became for their children and grandchildren an absolute right. And there's no turning back. Almost coincidentally, Secretary of State
参与奖学金。
这些目标植根于实际的现实,旨在达到有益的目的。20世纪40年代,《退伍军人权利法案》让800万退伍军人重返校园,这在这个国家引发了一场期望不断提高的革命。请允许我低声说,教授们并没有站在敦促《退伍军人权利法案》的最前线;这项倡议来自国会。事实上,许多学者质疑邀请美国大兵到校园来是否明智;毕竟,这些人没有通过sat考试——他们只是参加了战争,除了生存,他们还知道什么?故事变得更加残酷。几年前,我读到过一篇文章,说美国一所知名院校的招生办主任反对美国大兵入伍,因为他认为,他们中的许多人会结婚;他们会把婴儿车带进校园,甚至在这所质朴的大学里用糟糕的想法污染年轻的本科生。我想他对美国大兵知之甚少,对他所在大学的本科生就更不了解了。但撇开这些阻力不谈,重点主要在于,大学加入了一项绝对壮观的实验,在一种对不断提高的期望的文化承诺中,对美国大兵来说是一种特权的东西,对他们的子孙后代来说成了一种绝对的权利。而且没有回头路了。巧合的是,国务卿
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement (JHEOE) is to serve as the premier peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary journal to advance theory and practice related to all forms of outreach and engagement between higher education institutions and communities. This includes highlighting innovative endeavors; critically examining emerging issues, trends, challenges, and opportunities; and reporting on studies of impact in the areas of public service, outreach, engagement, extension, engaged research, community-based research, community-based participatory research, action research, public scholarship, service-learning, and community service.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信