Partnering Through It: Confronting the Institutional Challenges Facing Dual-Career Academic Couples

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
T. Monahan, J. Fisher
{"title":"Partnering Through It: Confronting the Institutional Challenges Facing Dual-Career Academic Couples","authors":"T. Monahan, J. Fisher","doi":"10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2022038905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Meeting the needs of dual-career academic couples can be an important step in recruiting and retaining university faculty and researchers. The goal of this essay is to review the existing scholarship on dual-career hires and offer concrete recommendations for university administrators. Background/Motivation: Attending to dual-career needs is especially relevant to efforts at diversifying the academic workforce, as multiple studies have indicated that faculty appointments are a major contributor to the so-called leaky pipeline causing attrition of women and scholars of color, particularly in biomedical and STEM fields. We take it as a feminist imperative to confront institutional discrimination against dual-career scholars and to intervene in the service of collective praxis. Intended Audience: Scholars and administrators interested in understanding and overcoming institutional barriers to achieving diverse, inclusive, and family-friendly academic workplaces. Contribution: This essay synthesizes the recent literature on dual-career hires and offers recommendations for university administrators. Positionality: We approach this issue as a senior academic couple that has navigated dual-career job searches for close to twenty years and has held faculty positions together at three different academic institutions. We are a white, hetero dual-career academic couple interested in developing resources for individuals striving to activate change at their universities.","PeriodicalId":35299,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2022038905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Meeting the needs of dual-career academic couples can be an important step in recruiting and retaining university faculty and researchers. The goal of this essay is to review the existing scholarship on dual-career hires and offer concrete recommendations for university administrators. Background/Motivation: Attending to dual-career needs is especially relevant to efforts at diversifying the academic workforce, as multiple studies have indicated that faculty appointments are a major contributor to the so-called leaky pipeline causing attrition of women and scholars of color, particularly in biomedical and STEM fields. We take it as a feminist imperative to confront institutional discrimination against dual-career scholars and to intervene in the service of collective praxis. Intended Audience: Scholars and administrators interested in understanding and overcoming institutional barriers to achieving diverse, inclusive, and family-friendly academic workplaces. Contribution: This essay synthesizes the recent literature on dual-career hires and offers recommendations for university administrators. Positionality: We approach this issue as a senior academic couple that has navigated dual-career job searches for close to twenty years and has held faculty positions together at three different academic institutions. We are a white, hetero dual-career academic couple interested in developing resources for individuals striving to activate change at their universities.
通过它建立伙伴关系:面对双职业学术夫妇面临的制度挑战
目的:满足双职业学术夫妇的需求是招聘和留住大学教师和研究人员的重要一步。本文的目的是回顾现有的双职业聘用奖学金,并为大学管理者提供具体的建议。背景/动机:关注双重职业需求与学术劳动力多样化的努力尤其相关,因为多项研究表明,教职员工的任命是所谓的“管道泄漏”的主要原因,导致女性和有色人种学者的流失,尤其是在生物医学和STEM领域。我们认为,面对对双职学者的制度性歧视,介入为集体实践服务,是女权主义的当务之急。目标受众:有兴趣了解和克服制度障碍,以实现多样化、包容性和家庭友好型学术工作场所的学者和管理人员。贡献:本文综合了最近关于双职业雇佣的文献,并为大学管理者提供了建议。定位:我们作为一对资深的学术夫妇来处理这个问题,这对夫妇在近20年的时间里一直在寻找双重职业,并在三个不同的学术机构担任教职。我们是一对白人、异性恋、双职业的学术夫妇,致力于为那些努力在他们的大学里激活变革的个人开发资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering (JWM) publishes original, peer-reviewed papers that report on empirical investigations covering a variety of topics related to achieving inclusion of historically underrepresented and minoritized populations in science and engineering education, academe, and professional practice. These populations include those who identify as people of color, white women, first generation college students, veterans, members of the LGBTQ+ community, people with disabilities, and the intersections of these and other identities. The journal especially welcomes research manuscripts that use theoretical frameworks and methodologies appropriate to the study of underrepresented and marginalized populations and/or use intersectional approaches. The journal also publishes studies on novel educational innovations that hold promise for transferability to other contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信