Good Feedback Practices Related to Asynchronous Online Writing Support in a Writing Center

Q4 Social Sciences
A. Rambiritch, A. Carstens
{"title":"Good Feedback Practices Related to Asynchronous Online Writing Support in a Writing Center","authors":"A. Rambiritch, A. Carstens","doi":"10.18848/2327-0136/cgp/v29i01/26-41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our writing center, constrained by the restrictions of the countrywide lockdown imposed on account of the COVID-19, moved their practices online. The surprising uptake of asynchronous, as opposed to synchronous writing support, dictated the need for a diagram or schematic description of good practices to train writing center consultants and enhance the quality of the feedback they provide to students. Drawing from several widely cited scholarly sources, we first define the notion of feedback and then summarize the criteria for providing effective feedback on student writing. These criteria inform the design of a diagram that is an intersection between the researchers’ experience of sound asynchronous online practices and literature-based practices. To justify and augment our diagram for use during tutor training and to ensure that our research and the diagram included the voices of the consultants who will eventually apply the principles inherent in the diagram in their consulting practices, the diagram and a verbal text explaining it was presented to current writing center consultants for feedback during a focus group discussion. The feedback gleaned from consultants both during and after the focus group discussion confirmed that the diagram is an effective tool that can help train writing center consultants on providing feedback during asynchronous writing center consultations.","PeriodicalId":38273,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Literacies","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Literacies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0136/cgp/v29i01/26-41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our writing center, constrained by the restrictions of the countrywide lockdown imposed on account of the COVID-19, moved their practices online. The surprising uptake of asynchronous, as opposed to synchronous writing support, dictated the need for a diagram or schematic description of good practices to train writing center consultants and enhance the quality of the feedback they provide to students. Drawing from several widely cited scholarly sources, we first define the notion of feedback and then summarize the criteria for providing effective feedback on student writing. These criteria inform the design of a diagram that is an intersection between the researchers’ experience of sound asynchronous online practices and literature-based practices. To justify and augment our diagram for use during tutor training and to ensure that our research and the diagram included the voices of the consultants who will eventually apply the principles inherent in the diagram in their consulting practices, the diagram and a verbal text explaining it was presented to current writing center consultants for feedback during a focus group discussion. The feedback gleaned from consultants both during and after the focus group discussion confirmed that the diagram is an effective tool that can help train writing center consultants on providing feedback during asynchronous writing center consultations.
与写作中心异步在线写作支持相关的良好反馈实践
由于新冠肺炎疫情,我们的写作中心受到了全国封锁的限制,将写作活动搬到了网上。与同步写作支持相反,异步写作支持令人惊讶地出现,这表明需要一个图表或示意图来描述良好的实践,以培训写作中心顾问,并提高他们向学生提供的反馈的质量。从一些被广泛引用的学术资料中,我们首先定义了反馈的概念,然后总结了为学生写作提供有效反馈的标准。这些标准为图表的设计提供了信息,该图表是研究人员在健全的异步在线实践经验和基于文献的实践之间的交集。为了证明和增强我们的图表在导师培训期间的使用,并确保我们的研究和图表包括顾问的声音,这些顾问最终将在他们的咨询实践中应用图表中固有的原则,图表和解释它的口头文本在焦点小组讨论期间提交给当前写作中心的顾问,以获得反馈。在焦点小组讨论期间和之后,从咨询师那里收集到的反馈证实,图表是一个有效的工具,可以帮助培训写作中心咨询师在异步写作中心咨询期间提供反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Literacies
International Journal of Literacies Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信