COMPARISON OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY FOUR-PLATE TEST, PREMI TEST AND ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY FOR OXYTETRACYCLINE RESIDUE DETECTION IN RAINBOW TROUT (ONCHORHYNCUS MYKISS)

BERNA KILINC, SUKRAN CAKLI, CARSTEN MEYER
{"title":"COMPARISON OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY FOUR-PLATE TEST, PREMI TEST AND ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY FOR OXYTETRACYCLINE RESIDUE DETECTION IN RAINBOW TROUT (ONCHORHYNCUS MYKISS)","authors":"BERNA KILINC,&nbsp;SUKRAN CAKLI,&nbsp;CARSTEN MEYER","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-4573.2010.00200.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> ABSTRACT</h3>\n \n <p> <i>The four-plate test (FPT), Premi test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods were used for screening oxytetracycline residues in fish samples. FPT is a microbiological inhibition test which uses three media seeded with</i> Bacillus subtilis <i>at different pH values (6, 7.2 or 8.0), and a fourth medium seeded with</i> Micrococcus luteus<i>. Fish fed with pellets containing antibiotics: the inhibition zones increased according to duration of feed application. Fish fed with pellets containing antibiotics: at day 1, the inhibition zone was found to be 2.5 mm wide; at day 4, the zones increased to 12.25 mm wide. The concentration of the residues accumulated and reached a plateau after 4 days. At day 15, the antibiotics were still detectable, but 5 days later (at day 20), they were no longer detectable in the fish samples. According to the Premi test, results of fish samples: fish samples of the control group were found negative, from days 1 to 20; the samples were found positive, at day 25; the samples were found negative. The results showed us that the Premi test and ELISA test were more sensitive than the European Economic Community FPT. In contrast to the FPT, 10 days after discontinuing the medicated diet, there were still residues detectable by the Premi test and ELISA test (at day 20). Data presented show the FPT, Premi test and ELISA test methods are very suitable for screening oxytetracycline residues in trout.</i></p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS</h3>\n \n <p>The use of antibiotics above the maximum residue limits could result in unsafe antibiotic residues in food products. Therefore, monitoring antibiotic residues in food products are necessary to prevent unapproved uses of antibiotics. The aim of the present study was to determine the most useful method for screening oxytetracycline residues in trout.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50122,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Muscle Foods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1745-4573.2010.00200.x","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Muscle Foods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1745-4573.2010.00200.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The four-plate test (FPT), Premi test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods were used for screening oxytetracycline residues in fish samples. FPT is a microbiological inhibition test which uses three media seeded with Bacillus subtilis at different pH values (6, 7.2 or 8.0), and a fourth medium seeded with Micrococcus luteus. Fish fed with pellets containing antibiotics: the inhibition zones increased according to duration of feed application. Fish fed with pellets containing antibiotics: at day 1, the inhibition zone was found to be 2.5 mm wide; at day 4, the zones increased to 12.25 mm wide. The concentration of the residues accumulated and reached a plateau after 4 days. At day 15, the antibiotics were still detectable, but 5 days later (at day 20), they were no longer detectable in the fish samples. According to the Premi test, results of fish samples: fish samples of the control group were found negative, from days 1 to 20; the samples were found positive, at day 25; the samples were found negative. The results showed us that the Premi test and ELISA test were more sensitive than the European Economic Community FPT. In contrast to the FPT, 10 days after discontinuing the medicated diet, there were still residues detectable by the Premi test and ELISA test (at day 20). Data presented show the FPT, Premi test and ELISA test methods are very suitable for screening oxytetracycline residues in trout.

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

The use of antibiotics above the maximum residue limits could result in unsafe antibiotic residues in food products. Therefore, monitoring antibiotic residues in food products are necessary to prevent unapproved uses of antibiotics. The aim of the present study was to determine the most useful method for screening oxytetracycline residues in trout.

欧共体四板法、premi法和酶联免疫吸附法检测虹鳟中土霉素残留的比较
摘要采用四板法(FPT)、Premi法和酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)筛选鱼类样品中土霉素残留。FPT是一种微生物抑制试验,使用三种培养基,在不同的pH值(6、7.2或8.0)下播种枯草芽孢杆菌,以及第四种培养基,播种黄体微球菌。用含抗生素微球喂鱼:随着投喂时间的延长,抑制区增加。饲喂含抗生素颗粒的鱼:第1天,发现抑制带宽为2.5 mm;第4天时,区宽增加到12.25 mm。残留浓度逐渐积累,4天后达到平稳期。在第15天,抗生素仍可检测到,但5天后(第20天),它们在鱼样本中不再检测到。根据Premi测试,鱼样结果:对照组鱼样为阴性,从第1天到第20天;样本在第25天呈阳性;样本呈阴性。结果表明,Premi法和ELISA法比欧洲经济共同体FPT法更敏感。与FPT相比,停用给药饮食10天后,Premi试验和ELISA试验(第20天)仍可检测到残留。结果表明,FPT法、Premi法和ELISA法均适用于鳟鱼体内土霉素残留的筛选。实际应用超过最大残留限量的抗生素的使用可能导致食品中的抗生素残留不安全。因此,监测食品中的抗生素残留是必要的,以防止未经批准使用抗生素。本研究的目的是确定筛选鳟鱼中土霉素残留的最有用的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Muscle Foods
Journal of Muscle Foods 工程技术-食品科技
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信