EFFECTS OF MUSCLE FIBER TYPES ON GEL PROPERTY OF SURIMI-LIKE MATERIALS FROM CHICKEN, PORK AND BEEF

GEUN-HO KANG, GU-BOO PARK, SEON-TEA JOO, MOOHA LEE, SUNG-KI LEE
{"title":"EFFECTS OF MUSCLE FIBER TYPES ON GEL PROPERTY OF SURIMI-LIKE MATERIALS FROM CHICKEN, PORK AND BEEF","authors":"GEUN-HO KANG,&nbsp;GU-BOO PARK,&nbsp;SEON-TEA JOO,&nbsp;MOOHA LEE,&nbsp;SUNG-KI LEE","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-4573.2009.00205.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> ABSTRACT</h3>\n \n <p> <i>The research was done to investigate the gel properties of surimi-like materials (SLM) from breast muscle of chicken, and semimembranosus muscle of porcine and bovine. Differences in the thickness and diameter of muscle fibers from three muscles were observed using field emission scanning electron microscope. As muscle fiber thickness decreased, gel microstructure of cooked SLM had smaller particles of amorphous proteins that might be related to hard and strong gel structures. These results implied that the gel texture seen in the SLM was dependent on muscle fiber types from different animals. The myosin ratio was increased with the decrease of red muscle fiber-type ratio, i.e., beef</i> &gt; <i>pork</i> &gt; <i>chicken. Amino acid composition analysis showed significantly (</i>P &lt; <i>0.05) higher proline percentage among the hydrophobic amino acids in chicken compared with pork and beef. Data implied that muscle fiber types affected the gel-forming ability of SLM.</i></p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS</h3>\n \n <p>Gel hardness of cooked surimi-like materials (SLM) was increased as pH decreased. The different pH of animal muscles might be related to differences in muscle protein composition and species. The different pH had effects not only on the sarcoplasmic protein in SLM after washing, but also on the functionality of myofibrillar proteins after cooking. Porcine muscle had the thickest muscle fibers, whereas bovine muscles had the smallest fiber diameter. This difference was correlated to gel hardness and microstructure of cooked SLM. The myosin ratio in the myofibrillar proteins was lower in SLM from beef than those from chicken and pork. The myosin ratio was increased as the red muscle fiber ratio decreased. Therefore, these results suggested that the myosin ratio in SLM depended on the muscle fiber type in raw muscles, and resulted in better gel-forming ability and texture of cooked SLM.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50122,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Muscle Foods","volume":"21 3","pages":"570-584"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1745-4573.2009.00205.x","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Muscle Foods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1745-4573.2009.00205.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The research was done to investigate the gel properties of surimi-like materials (SLM) from breast muscle of chicken, and semimembranosus muscle of porcine and bovine. Differences in the thickness and diameter of muscle fibers from three muscles were observed using field emission scanning electron microscope. As muscle fiber thickness decreased, gel microstructure of cooked SLM had smaller particles of amorphous proteins that might be related to hard and strong gel structures. These results implied that the gel texture seen in the SLM was dependent on muscle fiber types from different animals. The myosin ratio was increased with the decrease of red muscle fiber-type ratio, i.e., beef > pork > chicken. Amino acid composition analysis showed significantly (P < 0.05) higher proline percentage among the hydrophobic amino acids in chicken compared with pork and beef. Data implied that muscle fiber types affected the gel-forming ability of SLM.

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

Gel hardness of cooked surimi-like materials (SLM) was increased as pH decreased. The different pH of animal muscles might be related to differences in muscle protein composition and species. The different pH had effects not only on the sarcoplasmic protein in SLM after washing, but also on the functionality of myofibrillar proteins after cooking. Porcine muscle had the thickest muscle fibers, whereas bovine muscles had the smallest fiber diameter. This difference was correlated to gel hardness and microstructure of cooked SLM. The myosin ratio in the myofibrillar proteins was lower in SLM from beef than those from chicken and pork. The myosin ratio was increased as the red muscle fiber ratio decreased. Therefore, these results suggested that the myosin ratio in SLM depended on the muscle fiber type in raw muscles, and resulted in better gel-forming ability and texture of cooked SLM.

肌肉纤维类型对鸡肉、猪肉和牛肉类鱼糜材料凝胶性能的影响
摘要以鸡胸肌、猪半膜肌和牛半膜肌为原料,研究了类鱼糜材料(SLM)的凝胶性能。用场发射扫描电镜观察了三种肌肉肌纤维的厚度和直径的差异。随着肌纤维厚度的减小,煮熟的SLM凝胶微观结构中无定形蛋白的颗粒变小,这可能与凝胶结构坚硬强有关。这些结果表明,在SLM中看到的凝胶结构依赖于不同动物的肌纤维类型。肌球蛋白比值随红肌纤维型比值的降低而升高,即牛肉、猪肉、鸡肉。氨基酸组成分析表明,鸡肉疏水氨基酸中脯氨酸比例显著高于猪肉和牛肉(P < 0.05)。数据表明肌纤维类型影响了SLM的成胶能力。煮熟的类鱼糜材料(SLM)的凝胶硬度随着pH的降低而升高。动物肌肉pH值的不同可能与肌肉蛋白质组成和种类的差异有关。不同的pH值不仅对洗涤后的肌浆蛋白有影响,而且对蒸煮后肌原纤维蛋白的功能也有影响。猪肌肉的肌纤维最粗,牛肌肉的肌纤维直径最小。这种差异与煮熟的SLM的凝胶硬度和微观结构有关。牛肉SLM中肌原纤维蛋白中的肌球蛋白比例低于鸡肉和猪肉。肌球蛋白比值随红肌纤维比值的降低而升高。因此,这些结果表明,肌球蛋白比例与生肌肉纤维类型有关,并导致熟肌肉粉具有更好的成胶能力和质地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Muscle Foods
Journal of Muscle Foods 工程技术-食品科技
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信