The Impact of On-Wafer Calibration Method on the Measured Results of Coplanar Waveguide Circuits

Qian Li, K. Melde
{"title":"The Impact of On-Wafer Calibration Method on the Measured Results of Coplanar Waveguide Circuits","authors":"Qian Li, K. Melde","doi":"10.1109/TADVP.2009.2025365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares four commonly used on-wafer calibration methods including multiline thru-reflect-line (TRL), line-reflect-reflect-match, line-reflect-match, and short-open-load- thru, for three diverse coplanar waveguide (CPW) circuits. The magnitudes and phases of S 11 and S 21 of the CPW circuits are compared to quantify how the specific calibration method influences measured scattering parameters. Special care is taken to ensure that the measured scattering parameters are normalized to the same reference impedance and reference plane for accurate comparison. The measured results are compared with full-wave simulations to provide additional assessment of accuracy. A method to de-embed the discontinuity of the CPW at the probe tip and the CPW of the test structures is presented. The effect of probe-to-device-under-test discontinuity is effectively modeled by one- or two- section of shunt capacitor and series inductor. The results show that the multiline TRL calibration method provides the highest transmission coefficient repeatability on not well-matched circuits and highest accuracy on the three circuits in this paper up to 40 GHz.","PeriodicalId":55015,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging","volume":"33 1","pages":"285-292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/TADVP.2009.2025365","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TADVP.2009.2025365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

This paper compares four commonly used on-wafer calibration methods including multiline thru-reflect-line (TRL), line-reflect-reflect-match, line-reflect-match, and short-open-load- thru, for three diverse coplanar waveguide (CPW) circuits. The magnitudes and phases of S 11 and S 21 of the CPW circuits are compared to quantify how the specific calibration method influences measured scattering parameters. Special care is taken to ensure that the measured scattering parameters are normalized to the same reference impedance and reference plane for accurate comparison. The measured results are compared with full-wave simulations to provide additional assessment of accuracy. A method to de-embed the discontinuity of the CPW at the probe tip and the CPW of the test structures is presented. The effect of probe-to-device-under-test discontinuity is effectively modeled by one- or two- section of shunt capacitor and series inductor. The results show that the multiline TRL calibration method provides the highest transmission coefficient repeatability on not well-matched circuits and highest accuracy on the three circuits in this paper up to 40 GHz.
片上校准方法对共面波导电路测量结果的影响
针对三种不同的共面波导(CPW)电路,比较了四种常用的片上校准方法,包括多线通反射线(TRL)、线反射-反射匹配、线反射匹配和短开负载通。比较了CPW电路的s11和s21的幅值和相位,量化了特定校准方法对测量散射参数的影响。特别注意确保测量的散射参数归一化到相同的参考阻抗和参考平面,以便进行准确的比较。测量结果与全波模拟结果进行了比较,以提供额外的精度评估。提出了一种去除探针端CPW不连续性和测试结构CPW不连续性的方法。通过一段或两段并联电容和串联电感,可以有效地模拟测端与被测器件间不连续的影响。结果表明,多线TRL校准方法在非匹配电路上具有最高的传输系数可重复性,在40 GHz以下的三个电路上具有最高的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging
IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging 工程技术-材料科学:综合
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信