Studying Peers in Research on Social Withdrawal: Why Broader Assessments of Peers are Needed

IF 5.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Julie C. Bowker, Hope I. White
{"title":"Studying Peers in Research on Social Withdrawal: Why Broader Assessments of Peers are Needed","authors":"Julie C. Bowker,&nbsp;Hope I. White","doi":"10.1111/cdep.12404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>It has long been assumed that children and adolescents want to be with their peers and therefore make active efforts to engage with them. However, a sizable minority of youth avoid peers for internal reasons (e.g., anxiety, preferences for solitude) or because they are socially withdrawn. Although by definition, withdrawn youth tend to stay away from peers, they do interact and form relationships with peers. Yet most research assesses peers narrowly, focusing almost exclusively on youth who share the same gender and grade/school, leaving unanswered questions about which peers matter most. In this article, we highlight research findings that illustrate the very influential peer experiences of withdrawn children and adolescents, and we discuss emerging research on less frequently studied peers. By assessing peers more broadly, we contend, knowledge about the importance of peers to withdrawn youth will extend from same-gender and same-school contexts to the larger social milieus they inhabit.</p>","PeriodicalId":150,"journal":{"name":"Child Development Perspectives","volume":"15 2","pages":"90-95"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/cdep.12404","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Development Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cdep.12404","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

It has long been assumed that children and adolescents want to be with their peers and therefore make active efforts to engage with them. However, a sizable minority of youth avoid peers for internal reasons (e.g., anxiety, preferences for solitude) or because they are socially withdrawn. Although by definition, withdrawn youth tend to stay away from peers, they do interact and form relationships with peers. Yet most research assesses peers narrowly, focusing almost exclusively on youth who share the same gender and grade/school, leaving unanswered questions about which peers matter most. In this article, we highlight research findings that illustrate the very influential peer experiences of withdrawn children and adolescents, and we discuss emerging research on less frequently studied peers. By assessing peers more broadly, we contend, knowledge about the importance of peers to withdrawn youth will extend from same-gender and same-school contexts to the larger social milieus they inhabit.

在社会退缩研究中研究同伴:为什么需要对同伴进行更广泛的评估
长期以来,人们一直认为儿童和青少年希望与同龄人在一起,因此会积极努力与他们交往。然而,有相当数量的少数年轻人由于内在原因(例如,焦虑,喜欢独处)或因为他们在社交上退缩而避开同龄人。虽然根据定义,孤僻的年轻人倾向于远离同龄人,但他们确实会与同龄人互动并建立关系。然而,大多数研究对同龄人的评估都很狭隘,几乎只关注那些性别和年级/学校相同的年轻人,没有回答哪个同龄人最重要的问题。在这篇文章中,我们重点介绍了一些研究结果,这些研究结果说明了孤僻儿童和青少年非常有影响力的同伴经历,并讨论了一些关于不常被研究的同伴的新研究。我们认为,通过更广泛地评估同龄人,关于同龄人对孤僻青少年的重要性的认识将从同性和同一学校的背景扩展到他们所居住的更大的社会环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Child Development Perspectives
Child Development Perspectives PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
1.60%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Child Development Perspectives" mission is to provide accessible, synthetic reports that summarize emerging trends or conclusions within various domains of developmental research, and to encourage multidisciplinary and international dialogue on a variety of topics in the developmental sciences. Articles in the journal will include reviews, commentary, and groups of papers on a targeted issue. Manuscripts presenting new empirical data are not appropriate for this journal. Articles will be obtained through two sources: author-initiated submissions and invited articles or commentary. Potential contributors who have ideas about a set of three or four papers written from very different perspectives may contact the editor with their ideas for feedback.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信