Borderline Personality Disorder and Peers: A Scoping Review of Friendship, Victimization and Aggression Studies

IF 4.7 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Kevin Cecil Runions, Janice Wong, Giulia Pace, Ivan Salmin
{"title":"Borderline Personality Disorder and Peers: A Scoping Review of Friendship, Victimization and Aggression Studies","authors":"Kevin Cecil Runions,&nbsp;Janice Wong,&nbsp;Giulia Pace,&nbsp;Ivan Salmin","doi":"10.1007/s40894-020-00137-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by instability in interpersonal relationships. To date no reviews have scoped the extant research on peer relationship functioning for young people diagnosed with BPD or showing borderline personality features. The current review provides this scoping of studies on all facets of peer relationships, including friendship quality, peer victimization and bullying and peer aggression, and relevant studies of social–cognitive processes with relevance to peer relationships. From 282 studies identified up to August 2019, 39 studies were included for review. The majority of these were published between 2014 and 2019 (64%), with most studies using community samples (56.4%), conducted in the Unites States of America (51.3%) and over half (53.8%) with majority female (&gt; 60% of the sample) participants, and over half (53.8%) with adolescent samples (mean age between 13 and 18 years). Most studies only addressed one domain of peer relationships (general <i>k</i> = 15; friendships <i>k</i> = 12; victimization <i>k</i> = 10; aggression <i>k</i> = 12). Only 8 studies (19.5%) were identified that included measures that crossed these domains. Borderline personality features were consistently associated with problematic functioning across facets of peer functioning. However, relatively few studies were located that examined multiple domains of peer relationship qualities, leaving an unclear and disjointed body of research. Some promising directions have received scant attention, including unrealistic expectations of friendship exclusivity and the sequelae when those expectations are not met. Studies that explicitly probe the developmental role of dysregulation, that assess bully/victim co-occurrence, and that consider the dynamics of thwarted expectations for exclusive “best-friend” roles, especially within the context of potential disorganized attachment histories, are needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45912,"journal":{"name":"Adolescent Research Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40894-020-00137-y","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adolescent Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40894-020-00137-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by instability in interpersonal relationships. To date no reviews have scoped the extant research on peer relationship functioning for young people diagnosed with BPD or showing borderline personality features. The current review provides this scoping of studies on all facets of peer relationships, including friendship quality, peer victimization and bullying and peer aggression, and relevant studies of social–cognitive processes with relevance to peer relationships. From 282 studies identified up to August 2019, 39 studies were included for review. The majority of these were published between 2014 and 2019 (64%), with most studies using community samples (56.4%), conducted in the Unites States of America (51.3%) and over half (53.8%) with majority female (> 60% of the sample) participants, and over half (53.8%) with adolescent samples (mean age between 13 and 18 years). Most studies only addressed one domain of peer relationships (general k = 15; friendships k = 12; victimization k = 10; aggression k = 12). Only 8 studies (19.5%) were identified that included measures that crossed these domains. Borderline personality features were consistently associated with problematic functioning across facets of peer functioning. However, relatively few studies were located that examined multiple domains of peer relationship qualities, leaving an unclear and disjointed body of research. Some promising directions have received scant attention, including unrealistic expectations of friendship exclusivity and the sequelae when those expectations are not met. Studies that explicitly probe the developmental role of dysregulation, that assess bully/victim co-occurrence, and that consider the dynamics of thwarted expectations for exclusive “best-friend” roles, especially within the context of potential disorganized attachment histories, are needed.

Abstract Image

边缘型人格障碍与同伴:友谊、受害者和攻击性研究综述
边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的特点是人际关系不稳定。到目前为止,还没有关于被诊断为BPD或表现出边缘人格特征的年轻人的同伴关系功能的现有研究的综述。目前的综述提供了关于同伴关系各个方面的研究范围,包括友谊质量、同伴受害、欺凌和同伴攻击,以及与同伴关系相关的社会认知过程的相关研究。在截至2019年8月确定的282项研究中,有39项研究被纳入审查范围。其中大多数发表于2014年至2019年(64%),大多数研究使用社区样本(56.4%),在美利坚合众国进行(51.3%),超过一半(53.8%),大多数为女性(>; 60%的样本)参与者,以及超过一半(53.8%)的青少年样本(平均年龄在13至18岁之间)。大多数研究只涉及同伴关系的一个领域(一般k = 15;友谊k = 12;受害k = 10;侵略性k = 12) 。只有8项研究(19.5%)被确定为包括跨越这些领域的措施。在同伴功能的各个方面,边缘型人格特征始终与有问题的功能有关。然而,相对较少的研究涉及同伴关系质量的多个领域,留下了一个不明确和脱节的研究主体。一些有希望的方向很少受到关注,包括对友谊排他性的不切实际的期望,以及当这些期望得不到满足时的后遗症。需要进行明确探究调节障碍的发展作用的研究,评估欺凌者/受害者的共同出现,并考虑对排他性“最好朋友”角色的期望受挫的动态,特别是在潜在的无组织依恋史的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Adolescent Research Review
Adolescent Research Review PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Adolescent Research Review publishes articles that review important contributions to the understanding of adolescence.  The Review draws from the many subdisciplines of developmental science, psychological science, education, criminology, public health, medicine, social work, and other allied disciplines that address the subject of youth and adolescence. The editors are especially interested in articles that bridge gaps between disciplines or that focus on topics that transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries.  Reviews must be cutting edge and comprehensive in the way they advance science, practice or policy relating to adolescents.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信