Exploring the first steps of retirement engagement: a conceptual model and field evidence

IF 7.8 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Wiebke Eberhardt, Thomas Post, Chantal Hoet, Elisabeth Brüggen
{"title":"Exploring the first steps of retirement engagement: a conceptual model and field evidence","authors":"Wiebke Eberhardt, Thomas Post, Chantal Hoet, Elisabeth Brüggen","doi":"10.1108/josm-11-2020-0402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The authors develop and validate a conceptual model, the retirement engagement model (REM), to understand the relationships between behavioral engagement (retirement information search), cognitive factors and engagement (e.g. beliefs and financial knowledge), emotional engagement (e.g. anxiety), and socio-demographic factors. Approach: The authors derive the REM through a three-step procedure: (1) an extensive literature review, (2) interactive feedback sessions with experts to confirm the model's academic and managerial relevance, and (3) an empirical test of the REM with field data (<em>N</em> = 583). The authors use a partial least squares (PLS) structural equation model and examine heterogeneity through a finite mixture model.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Around the globe, people are insufficiently engaged with retirement planning. The customer engagement literature offers rich insights into antecedents, outcomes, and barriers to engagement. However, customer engagement literature lacks insights into cognitive, emotional and behavioral factors that drive engagement in retirement planning, a utilitarian service context, which is important for financial well-being.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Beliefs such as perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits, barriers, and self-efficacy, together with trust and retirement anxiety, explain people's search for pension information. These factors can be used to define three clear, actionable segments of consumers.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The findings advance the customer engagement and transformative service research literature by generating insights on engagement with retirement planning, a utilitarian rather than hedonic service context that is especially relevant for financial well-being. The findings inform managerial practice and emphasize the relevance of including cognitive and emotional engagement factors that trigger behavioral engagement. The REM can help to improve pension communication. For example, the results indicate that marketers should stress the benefits of, rather than the barriers to, acquiring information.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Service Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Service Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-11-2020-0402","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose

The authors develop and validate a conceptual model, the retirement engagement model (REM), to understand the relationships between behavioral engagement (retirement information search), cognitive factors and engagement (e.g. beliefs and financial knowledge), emotional engagement (e.g. anxiety), and socio-demographic factors. Approach: The authors derive the REM through a three-step procedure: (1) an extensive literature review, (2) interactive feedback sessions with experts to confirm the model's academic and managerial relevance, and (3) an empirical test of the REM with field data (N = 583). The authors use a partial least squares (PLS) structural equation model and examine heterogeneity through a finite mixture model.

Design/methodology/approach

Around the globe, people are insufficiently engaged with retirement planning. The customer engagement literature offers rich insights into antecedents, outcomes, and barriers to engagement. However, customer engagement literature lacks insights into cognitive, emotional and behavioral factors that drive engagement in retirement planning, a utilitarian service context, which is important for financial well-being.

Findings

Beliefs such as perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits, barriers, and self-efficacy, together with trust and retirement anxiety, explain people's search for pension information. These factors can be used to define three clear, actionable segments of consumers.

Originality/value

The findings advance the customer engagement and transformative service research literature by generating insights on engagement with retirement planning, a utilitarian rather than hedonic service context that is especially relevant for financial well-being. The findings inform managerial practice and emphasize the relevance of including cognitive and emotional engagement factors that trigger behavioral engagement. The REM can help to improve pension communication. For example, the results indicate that marketers should stress the benefits of, rather than the barriers to, acquiring information.

Abstract Image

探索退休契约的第一步:一个概念模型和实地证据
目的建立并验证一个概念模型——退休敬业度模型(REM),以了解行为敬业度(退休信息搜索)、认知因素与敬业度(如信念和财务知识)、情感敬业度(如焦虑)和社会人口因素之间的关系。方法:作者通过三个步骤得出快速眼动模型:(1)广泛的文献综述;(2)与专家进行互动反馈会议,以确认模型的学术和管理相关性;(3)使用现场数据(N = 583)对快速眼动模型进行实证检验。作者使用偏最小二乘(PLS)结构方程模型,并通过有限混合模型检验异质性。设计/方法/方法在全球范围内,人们对退休计划的参与不够。客户参与的文献提供了丰富的关于参与的前提、结果和障碍的见解。然而,客户参与文献缺乏对退休计划中驱动客户参与的认知、情感和行为因素的见解,这是一个实用的服务环境,对财务健康很重要。诸如感知易感性、严重性、福利、障碍和自我效能感等信念,以及信任和退休焦虑,解释了人们对养老金信息的搜索。这些因素可以用来定义三个清晰的、可操作的消费者群体。原创性/价值这些发现通过对退休计划的参与产生见解,推动了客户参与和变革性服务研究文献,这是一种功利主义而非享乐主义的服务环境,与财务福祉特别相关。研究结果为管理实践提供了信息,并强调了包括触发行为参与的认知和情感参与因素的相关性。快速眼动有助于改善养老金沟通。例如,结果表明,营销人员应该强调获取信息的好处,而不是障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Service Management (JOSM) centers its scope on research in service management. It disseminates papers showcasing distinctive and noteworthy contributions to service literature, serving as a communication platform for individuals in the service management field, transcending disciplines, functional areas, sectors, and nationalities. The journal publishes double-blind reviewed papers emphasizing service literature/theory and its practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信