Self-service technology recovery: the importance of psychological need support

IF 7.8 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Byron W. Keating, Marjan Aslan
{"title":"Self-service technology recovery: the importance of psychological need support","authors":"Byron W. Keating, Marjan Aslan","doi":"10.1108/josm-12-2021-0464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The service recovery literature provides little guidance to firms on how users of self-service technology (SST) perceive assistance provided by human and non-human service agents following a service obstacle. This research responds by addressing two important research questions about SST recovery: (1) how are perceptions of assistance provided following a service obstacle influenced by a customer's psychological needs? and (2) does supporting the psychological needs of customers positively impact continuance intentions following a service obstacle?</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Data are collected to address the research questions via five experiments that explore how assistance provided by a non-human (vs human vs no assistance) service agent contributes to perceptions of psychological support and continuance intentions following a service obstacle while volitionally using SST.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results show that while users of SST would prefer to do so without an obstacle requiring intervention of a service agent, if assistance is required then the psychological need support elicited from a non-human service agent was vital to an effective recovery. Further, the findings highlight some boundary conditions for this relationship, with the impact of customer perceived need support on continuance intentions found to be sensitive to fit between the task and assistance provided and the complexity of the task being completed.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Much of the prior service recovery literature has emphasized the different types of tactics that can be used (e.g. apologizing, monetary compensation and explaining what happened), failing to appreciate the role of different types of service agents or the underlying psychological process that explain the relative merit of such tactics. The present research shows that for these tactics to influence continuance intentions, they must be provided by a relevant service agent and support a customer's psychological need for autonomy, competence and relatedness. The hypothesized impact of psychological need support on continuance intentions was also observed to be contingent upon the fit between the task and the type of assistance provided, where the level of task complexity attenuated this fit.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Service Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Service Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-12-2021-0464","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose

The service recovery literature provides little guidance to firms on how users of self-service technology (SST) perceive assistance provided by human and non-human service agents following a service obstacle. This research responds by addressing two important research questions about SST recovery: (1) how are perceptions of assistance provided following a service obstacle influenced by a customer's psychological needs? and (2) does supporting the psychological needs of customers positively impact continuance intentions following a service obstacle?

Design/methodology/approach

Data are collected to address the research questions via five experiments that explore how assistance provided by a non-human (vs human vs no assistance) service agent contributes to perceptions of psychological support and continuance intentions following a service obstacle while volitionally using SST.

Findings

The results show that while users of SST would prefer to do so without an obstacle requiring intervention of a service agent, if assistance is required then the psychological need support elicited from a non-human service agent was vital to an effective recovery. Further, the findings highlight some boundary conditions for this relationship, with the impact of customer perceived need support on continuance intentions found to be sensitive to fit between the task and assistance provided and the complexity of the task being completed.

Originality/value

Much of the prior service recovery literature has emphasized the different types of tactics that can be used (e.g. apologizing, monetary compensation and explaining what happened), failing to appreciate the role of different types of service agents or the underlying psychological process that explain the relative merit of such tactics. The present research shows that for these tactics to influence continuance intentions, they must be provided by a relevant service agent and support a customer's psychological need for autonomy, competence and relatedness. The hypothesized impact of psychological need support on continuance intentions was also observed to be contingent upon the fit between the task and the type of assistance provided, where the level of task complexity attenuated this fit.

自助服务技术康复:心理需求支持的重要性
服务恢复方面的文献对企业在遇到服务障碍后,自助服务技术(SST)的用户如何感知人类和非人类服务代理提供的帮助提供了很少的指导。本研究通过解决关于SST恢复的两个重要研究问题来回应:(1)客户心理需求如何影响服务障碍后所提供援助的感知?(2)支持顾客心理需求是否正向影响服务障碍后的延续意愿?设计/方法/方法通过五个实验收集数据来解决研究问题,这些实验探讨了在自愿使用SST的情况下,非人类服务代理(与人类服务代理相比)提供的帮助如何影响服务障碍后心理支持和继续意图的感知。研究结果表明,虽然SST的使用者更倾向于在没有需要服务代理干预的障碍的情况下这样做,但如果需要帮助,那么从非人类服务代理那里获得的心理需求支持对于有效的康复至关重要。此外,研究结果强调了这种关系的一些边界条件,客户感知需求支持对延续意图的影响被发现对所提供的任务和援助之间的契合以及正在完成的任务的复杂性非常敏感。许多先前服务补救文献都强调了可以使用的不同类型的策略(例如道歉、金钱补偿和解释所发生的事情),而没有认识到不同类型的服务代理人的作用,也没有认识到解释这些策略相对优点的潜在心理过程。本研究表明,这些策略要想影响顾客的延续意愿,必须由相关的服务代理人提供,并支持顾客对自主性、胜任力和关联性的心理需求。心理需求支持对继续意图的假设影响也被观察到取决于任务和所提供的援助类型之间的契合度,其中任务复杂性水平减弱了这种契合度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Service Management (JOSM) centers its scope on research in service management. It disseminates papers showcasing distinctive and noteworthy contributions to service literature, serving as a communication platform for individuals in the service management field, transcending disciplines, functional areas, sectors, and nationalities. The journal publishes double-blind reviewed papers emphasizing service literature/theory and its practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信