NATIONAL RECONCILIATION IN THE AGE OF NEW SOCIAL MEDIA: The War on Silence in the Tunisian Truth Commission's Facebook-Mediated Public Hearings

IF 1.9 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
DOUAA SHEET
{"title":"NATIONAL RECONCILIATION IN THE AGE OF NEW SOCIAL MEDIA: The War on Silence in the Tunisian Truth Commission's Facebook-Mediated Public Hearings","authors":"DOUAA SHEET","doi":"10.14506/ca38.3.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>At first glance, there seems to be a shared mission between social media's promise of increased dissemination of information and truth commissions' commitment to truth, granting victims a voice, and safeguarding people's right to information—which would suggest that the rise of the former could only empower the latter. This study suggests otherwise. I argue that social media can impede truth commissions' liberal vision that celebrates “speaking” as synonymous with “healing” and hails publicizing victims' testimonies as key to facilitating national reconciliation. Through a study of the Tunisian Truth and Dignity Commission's Facebook-mediated public hearings, I analyze these platforms' algorithmic mode of content circulation and argue that one of its less analyzed features is its “war on silence.” While “voice” has been celebrated and silence decried in human rights discourse, I analyze silence as a “gap in knowledge” and argue for its role in forging empathetic publics and mediating reconciliation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51423,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Anthropology","volume":"38 3","pages":"361-385"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.14506/ca38.3.03","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.14506/ca38.3.03","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At first glance, there seems to be a shared mission between social media's promise of increased dissemination of information and truth commissions' commitment to truth, granting victims a voice, and safeguarding people's right to information—which would suggest that the rise of the former could only empower the latter. This study suggests otherwise. I argue that social media can impede truth commissions' liberal vision that celebrates “speaking” as synonymous with “healing” and hails publicizing victims' testimonies as key to facilitating national reconciliation. Through a study of the Tunisian Truth and Dignity Commission's Facebook-mediated public hearings, I analyze these platforms' algorithmic mode of content circulation and argue that one of its less analyzed features is its “war on silence.” While “voice” has been celebrated and silence decried in human rights discourse, I analyze silence as a “gap in knowledge” and argue for its role in forging empathetic publics and mediating reconciliation.

新社交媒体时代的国家和解:突尼斯真相委员会脸书调解的公开听证会中的沉默之战
乍一看,社交媒体增加信息传播的承诺与真相委员会对真相的承诺、给予受害者发言权和保障人们的信息权之间似乎有着共同的使命——这表明前者的兴起只能赋予后者权力。这项研究表明情况并非如此。我认为,社交媒体可能会阻碍真相委员会的自由主义愿景,即将“说话”视为“治愈”的代名词,并将公布受害者的证词视为促进民族和解的关键。通过对突尼斯真相与尊严委员会Facebook调解的公开听证会的研究,我分析了这些平台的内容传播算法模式,并认为其较少分析的特征之一是“向沉默宣战”,我将沉默分析为一种“知识鸿沟”,并认为它在培养有同情心的公众和调解和解方面发挥着作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cultural Anthropology
Cultural Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Cultural Anthropology publishes ethnographic writing informed by a wide array of theoretical perspectives, innovative in form and content, and focused on both traditional and emerging topics. It also welcomes essays concerned with ethnographic methods and research design in historical perspective, and with ways cultural analysis can address broader public audiences and interests.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信