Improved antioxidant capacity of three Brassica vegetables by two-step controlled fermentation using isolated autochthone strains of the genus Leuconostoc spp. and Lactiplantibacillus spp

IF 4.1 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Romina B. Parada , Emilio Marguet , Carmen Campos , Marisol Vallejo
{"title":"Improved antioxidant capacity of three Brassica vegetables by two-step controlled fermentation using isolated autochthone strains of the genus Leuconostoc spp. and Lactiplantibacillus spp","authors":"Romina B. Parada ,&nbsp;Emilio Marguet ,&nbsp;Carmen Campos ,&nbsp;Marisol Vallejo","doi":"10.1016/j.fochms.2023.100163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this study was to determine the evolution of total phenolic content and antioxidant activity during controlled fermentation of three different Brassicaceae and compare it with spontaneous fermentations. The two-step controlled fermentation was carried out with lactic acid bacteria selected by their biotechnological properties. The selected bacteria were genotypically identified as <em>Leuconostoc mesenteroides</em> ssp. <em>jonggajibkimchii</em>, <em>Ln. mesenteroides</em> ssp. <em>dextranicum</em>, <em>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</em> ssp. <em>argentoratensis</em>, <em>L. plantarum</em> and <em>L. pentosus</em>. The total phenolic content did not show a trend when comparing the different fermentations; it depended on the type of extract and vegetable. The controlled fermentation exhibited higher antioxidant activity than spontaneous fermentations for all the vegetables during the process. The extracts of red cabbage exhibited a total phenolic content and antioxidant activity higher than chinese and white cabbage, regardless of the type of fermentation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34477,"journal":{"name":"Food Chemistry Molecular Sciences","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100163"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Chemistry Molecular Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666566223000035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the evolution of total phenolic content and antioxidant activity during controlled fermentation of three different Brassicaceae and compare it with spontaneous fermentations. The two-step controlled fermentation was carried out with lactic acid bacteria selected by their biotechnological properties. The selected bacteria were genotypically identified as Leuconostoc mesenteroides ssp. jonggajibkimchii, Ln. mesenteroides ssp. dextranicum, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ssp. argentoratensis, L. plantarum and L. pentosus. The total phenolic content did not show a trend when comparing the different fermentations; it depended on the type of extract and vegetable. The controlled fermentation exhibited higher antioxidant activity than spontaneous fermentations for all the vegetables during the process. The extracts of red cabbage exhibited a total phenolic content and antioxidant activity higher than chinese and white cabbage, regardless of the type of fermentation.

利用Leuconostoc和Lactiplantibacillus分离菌株两步控制发酵提高三种芸苔属蔬菜的抗氧化能力
研究了三种芸苔科植物在控制发酵过程中总酚含量和抗氧化活性的变化,并与自然发酵过程进行了比较。根据乳酸菌的生物技术特性,选择乳酸菌进行两步控制发酵。所选细菌经基因型鉴定为肠系膜白菌(Leuconostoc mesenteroides)。jonggajibkimchii Ln。mesenteroides ssp。葡聚糖,植物乳杆菌。阿根廷松、植物松和薄荷松。不同发酵方式的总酚含量差异不明显;这取决于提取物和蔬菜的种类。在控制发酵过程中,所有蔬菜的抗氧化活性均高于自然发酵。无论发酵方式如何,红甘蓝提取物的总酚含量和抗氧化活性均高于大白菜和白甘蓝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Chemistry Molecular Sciences
Food Chemistry Molecular Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
82 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信