The impact of carbon emissions trading policy on carbon emission efficiency in Chinese cities: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment

IF 3.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Keliang Wang , Yuanjie Qiao , Liwei Ling , Ziheng Zhao , Kun Liu
{"title":"The impact of carbon emissions trading policy on carbon emission efficiency in Chinese cities: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment","authors":"Keliang Wang ,&nbsp;Yuanjie Qiao ,&nbsp;Liwei Ling ,&nbsp;Ziheng Zhao ,&nbsp;Kun Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.cjpre.2023.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Based on a panel dataset spanning from 2003 to 2019 and encompassing 284 prefecture-level cities in China, this study treats the implementation of the carbon emissions trading policy (CETP) as a quasi-natural experiment. In addition, it employs a spatial difference-in-differences (DID) framework to quantify both the direct and spatially mediated impacts of CETP on urban carbon emission efficiency (CEE). The investigation further delves into the underlying channels of influence and variations within this context. The findings demonstrate that CETP effectively enhances CEE within the cities chosen for piloting; however, it concurrently dampens CEE in nonpiloting neighboring cities. These conclusions remain robust across diverse sensitivity tests. The analysis of mechanisms reveals that CETP’s influence on urban CEE primarily operates through the avenues of technological innovation and optimization of energy structure. Moreover, the study of variances discloses that CETP’s direct effect significantly advances CEE in eastern, old industrial base, and central cities. In terms of indirect effects, a pronounced adverse spatial spillover effect is observed in eastern and old industrial base cities, while noteworthy positive spatial spillover effects emerge in central cities. Notably, the spatial extent of CETP’s influence on urban CEE declines after reaching a distance of 900 km. These insights furnish valuable guidance for China in refining its nationwide carbon market and expediting the shift toward a low-carbon economy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45743,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment","volume":"21 3","pages":"Pages 121-136"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2325426223000281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on a panel dataset spanning from 2003 to 2019 and encompassing 284 prefecture-level cities in China, this study treats the implementation of the carbon emissions trading policy (CETP) as a quasi-natural experiment. In addition, it employs a spatial difference-in-differences (DID) framework to quantify both the direct and spatially mediated impacts of CETP on urban carbon emission efficiency (CEE). The investigation further delves into the underlying channels of influence and variations within this context. The findings demonstrate that CETP effectively enhances CEE within the cities chosen for piloting; however, it concurrently dampens CEE in nonpiloting neighboring cities. These conclusions remain robust across diverse sensitivity tests. The analysis of mechanisms reveals that CETP’s influence on urban CEE primarily operates through the avenues of technological innovation and optimization of energy structure. Moreover, the study of variances discloses that CETP’s direct effect significantly advances CEE in eastern, old industrial base, and central cities. In terms of indirect effects, a pronounced adverse spatial spillover effect is observed in eastern and old industrial base cities, while noteworthy positive spatial spillover effects emerge in central cities. Notably, the spatial extent of CETP’s influence on urban CEE declines after reaching a distance of 900 km. These insights furnish valuable guidance for China in refining its nationwide carbon market and expediting the shift toward a low-carbon economy.

碳排放权交易政策对中国城市碳排放效率的影响——来自准自然实验的证据
基于2003年至2019年的面板数据集,涵盖了中国284个地级市,本研究将碳排放交易政策的实施视为一个准自然实验。此外,它采用了空间差异(DID)框架来量化CETP对城市碳排放效率(CEE)的直接和空间中介影响。调查进一步深入探讨了在这种背景下影响和变化的潜在渠道。研究结果表明,CETP有效地提高了试点城市的中东欧水平;然而,它同时也抑制了邻近城市的中东欧。这些结论在不同的敏感性测试中仍然是稳健的。机制分析表明,CETP对中东欧城市的影响主要通过技术创新和能源结构优化途径发挥作用。方差分析表明,CETP的直接效应显著促进了东部、老工业基地和中心城市的中东欧。在间接效应方面,东部和老工业基地城市出现了明显的不利空间溢出效应,而中心城市出现了显著的正向空间溢出效应。值得注意的是,CETP对中东欧城市影响的空间范围在达到900公里后有所下降。这些见解为中国完善全国碳市场、加快向低碳经济转型提供了宝贵的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
791
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment (CJPRE) is a peer-reviewed international academic journal that publishes original research in the fields of economic, population, resource, and environment studies as they relate to sustainable development. The journal aims to address and evaluate theoretical frameworks, capability building initiatives, strategic goals, ethical values, empirical research, methodologies, and techniques in the field. CJPRE began publication in 1992 and is sponsored by the Chinese Society for Sustainable Development (CSSD), the Research Center for Sustainable Development of Shandong Province, the Administrative Center for China's Agenda 21 (ACCA21), and Shandong Normal University. The Chinese title of the journal was inscribed by the former Chinese leader, Mr. Deng Xiaoping. Initially focused on China's advances in sustainable development, CJPRE now also highlights global developments from both developed and developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信