Examining the association of life course neurocognitive ability with real-world functioning in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Sylvia Romanowska , Michael W. Best , Christopher R. Bowie , Colin A. Depp , Thomas L. Patterson , David L. Penn , Amy E. Pinkham , Philip D. Harvey
{"title":"Examining the association of life course neurocognitive ability with real-world functioning in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders","authors":"Sylvia Romanowska ,&nbsp;Michael W. Best ,&nbsp;Christopher R. Bowie ,&nbsp;Colin A. Depp ,&nbsp;Thomas L. Patterson ,&nbsp;David L. Penn ,&nbsp;Amy E. Pinkham ,&nbsp;Philip D. Harvey","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2022.100254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is considerable variability in neurocognitive functioning within schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, and neurocognitive performance ranges from severe global impairment to normative performance. Few investigations of neurocognitive clusters have considered the degree to which deterioration relative to premorbid neurocognitive abilities is related to key illness characteristics. Moreover, while neurocognition and community functioning are strongly related, understanding of the sources of variability in the association between these two domains is also limited; it is unknown what proportion of participants would over-perform or under-perform the level of functioning expected based on current neurocognitive performance vs. lifelong attainment. This study examined data from 954 outpatients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders across three previous studies. Neurocognition, community functioning, and symptoms were assessed. Neurocognitive subgroups were created based on current neurocognition, estimated premorbid IQ, and degree of deterioration from premorbid using z-score cut-offs; functional subgroups were created with cluster analysis based on the Specific Level of Functioning Scale and current neurocognition. The sample was neurocognitively heterogeneous; 65% displayed current neurocognitive impairment and 84% experienced some level of deterioration. Thirty percent of our sample was relatively higher functioning despite significant neurocognitive impairment. Individuals with better community functioning, regardless of neurocognitive performance, had lower symptom severity compared to those with worse functioning. These results highlight the variability in neurocognition and its role in functioning. Understanding individual differences in neurocognitive and functional profiles and the interaction between prior and current cognitive functioning can guide individualized treatment and selection of participants for clinical treatment studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 100254"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001322000191/pdfft?md5=c7f52d08489853ee1c7067b53f2d96d6&pid=1-s2.0-S2215001322000191-main.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001322000191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

There is considerable variability in neurocognitive functioning within schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, and neurocognitive performance ranges from severe global impairment to normative performance. Few investigations of neurocognitive clusters have considered the degree to which deterioration relative to premorbid neurocognitive abilities is related to key illness characteristics. Moreover, while neurocognition and community functioning are strongly related, understanding of the sources of variability in the association between these two domains is also limited; it is unknown what proportion of participants would over-perform or under-perform the level of functioning expected based on current neurocognitive performance vs. lifelong attainment. This study examined data from 954 outpatients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders across three previous studies. Neurocognition, community functioning, and symptoms were assessed. Neurocognitive subgroups were created based on current neurocognition, estimated premorbid IQ, and degree of deterioration from premorbid using z-score cut-offs; functional subgroups were created with cluster analysis based on the Specific Level of Functioning Scale and current neurocognition. The sample was neurocognitively heterogeneous; 65% displayed current neurocognitive impairment and 84% experienced some level of deterioration. Thirty percent of our sample was relatively higher functioning despite significant neurocognitive impairment. Individuals with better community functioning, regardless of neurocognitive performance, had lower symptom severity compared to those with worse functioning. These results highlight the variability in neurocognition and its role in functioning. Understanding individual differences in neurocognitive and functional profiles and the interaction between prior and current cognitive functioning can guide individualized treatment and selection of participants for clinical treatment studies.

研究精神分裂症谱系障碍患者生命历程神经认知能力与现实世界功能的关系
精神分裂症谱系障碍的神经认知功能存在相当大的差异,神经认知表现从严重的整体损害到正常表现不等。很少有神经认知集群的研究考虑到相对于发病前神经认知能力的恶化程度与关键疾病特征的关系。此外,虽然神经认知和社区功能密切相关,但对这两个领域之间关联的变异性来源的理解也是有限的;目前尚不清楚,根据当前的神经认知表现和终身成就,有多少比例的参与者表现过高或低于预期的功能水平。这项研究调查了之前三项研究中954名精神分裂症谱系障碍门诊患者的数据。评估神经认知、社区功能和症状。神经认知亚组是基于当前的神经认知、预估的病前智商和使用z分数截断值的病前恶化程度来创建的;基于特定功能水平量表和当前神经认知,采用聚类分析建立功能亚组。样本具有神经认知异质性;65%的人表现出当前的神经认知障碍,84%的人经历了某种程度的恶化。我们的样本中有30%的人尽管有严重的神经认知障碍,但功能相对较高。社区功能较好的个体,无论神经认知表现如何,与功能较差的个体相比,症状严重程度较低。这些结果突出了神经认知的可变性及其在功能中的作用。了解神经认知和功能特征的个体差异以及先前和当前认知功能之间的相互作用可以指导个体化治疗和临床治疗研究参与者的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信