Haunted by hope: (Re)tracing the complexities embedded within assemblages of violence

IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Bretton A. Varga, C. van Kessel
{"title":"Haunted by hope: (Re)tracing the complexities embedded within assemblages of violence","authors":"Bretton A. Varga, C. van Kessel","doi":"10.1080/00933104.2021.2002107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Violence is diverging, intra-active, complex, and becomes (re)produced across/within variegated trajectories. In her recent book, Assemblages of Violence in Education, Boni Wozolek lays bare the possibilities of conceptualizing violence as such. She undertakes this task by leaning into post-structuralist (e.g., Deleuze & Guattari, 1980/2008; Foucault, 1976/1978) and new materialist (e.g., Barad, 2007; Delanda, 2016) framings to explore the imbricated and ubiquitous nature of violence and its implications on human and nonhuman bodies in educational contexts. Referring to assemblages as “messy and entangled intermingling of bodies” (p. 64), Wozolek calls for our “attention to the deeply linked bodies that impact and intra-act across distances, resulting sometimes in affects that buttress each other” (p. 55). In particular, she works along the contours of contemporary scholarship (e.g., Ahmed, 2010; Berlant, 2011) that conceptualizes affect as being more-than a complex set of emotions manifesting between (non/human) bodies. According to Wozolek, these intricate emotional webs are precarious insofar that they are susceptible to manipulation and (violent) applications of power. While power and violence can be “nested and knotted” (p. 15) within these intra-actions (i.e., co-constitutive agency that emerges from within two or more bodies [Barad, 2007]), Wozolek is especially interested in how violence reverberates across/within the spaces, times, and matter(ing)s of “two all-too-consistent recipients of violence: girls and women, and LGBTQ+ people” (p. 20). Within this context, Wozolek braids together participant stories from both the United States and India with her interdisciplinary theoretical and methodological approaches that challenge cultural “common sense” (Kumashiro, 2015) and can help educators and researchers as they continue to seek out (re)new(ed) avenues for cultivating (educational) equity, responsibility, and justice.","PeriodicalId":46808,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Research in Social Education","volume":"50 1","pages":"498 - 504"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Research in Social Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2021.2002107","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Violence is diverging, intra-active, complex, and becomes (re)produced across/within variegated trajectories. In her recent book, Assemblages of Violence in Education, Boni Wozolek lays bare the possibilities of conceptualizing violence as such. She undertakes this task by leaning into post-structuralist (e.g., Deleuze & Guattari, 1980/2008; Foucault, 1976/1978) and new materialist (e.g., Barad, 2007; Delanda, 2016) framings to explore the imbricated and ubiquitous nature of violence and its implications on human and nonhuman bodies in educational contexts. Referring to assemblages as “messy and entangled intermingling of bodies” (p. 64), Wozolek calls for our “attention to the deeply linked bodies that impact and intra-act across distances, resulting sometimes in affects that buttress each other” (p. 55). In particular, she works along the contours of contemporary scholarship (e.g., Ahmed, 2010; Berlant, 2011) that conceptualizes affect as being more-than a complex set of emotions manifesting between (non/human) bodies. According to Wozolek, these intricate emotional webs are precarious insofar that they are susceptible to manipulation and (violent) applications of power. While power and violence can be “nested and knotted” (p. 15) within these intra-actions (i.e., co-constitutive agency that emerges from within two or more bodies [Barad, 2007]), Wozolek is especially interested in how violence reverberates across/within the spaces, times, and matter(ing)s of “two all-too-consistent recipients of violence: girls and women, and LGBTQ+ people” (p. 20). Within this context, Wozolek braids together participant stories from both the United States and India with her interdisciplinary theoretical and methodological approaches that challenge cultural “common sense” (Kumashiro, 2015) and can help educators and researchers as they continue to seek out (re)new(ed) avenues for cultivating (educational) equity, responsibility, and justice.
被希望所困扰:(重新)追踪暴力组合中的复杂性
暴力是分散的、内在的、复杂的,并在多样化的轨迹中(重新)产生。博尼·沃佐雷克在她的新书《教育中的暴力集合》中揭示了将暴力概念化的可能性。她通过研究后结构主义(例如,Deleuze&Guattari,1980/2008;福柯,1976/1978)和新唯物主义(例如Barad,2007;Delanda,2016)框架来探索暴力的重叠和普遍性及其在教育背景下对人类和非人类身体的影响,从而承担了这项任务。沃佐雷克将组合称为“混乱和纠缠的身体混合”(第64页),他呼吁我们“关注那些相互影响和相互影响的身体,有时会产生相互支持的影响”(第55页)。特别是,她沿着当代学术的轮廓工作(例如,Ahmed,2010;Berlant,2011),将情感概念化为不仅仅是(非人类)身体之间表现出的一组复杂情绪。根据沃佐雷克的说法,这些复杂的情感网络是不稳定的,因为它们容易受到操纵和(暴力)权力应用的影响。虽然权力和暴力可以在这些内部行动中“嵌套和打结”(第15页)(即,从两个或多个机构中产生的共同构成机构[Barad,2007]),但Wozolek特别感兴趣的是,暴力如何在“两个非常一致的暴力接受者:女孩和妇女,以及LGBTQ+人群”的空间、时代和物质中产生反响(第20页)。在这种背景下,Wozolek将来自美国和印度的参与者故事与她的跨学科理论和方法论方法编织在一起,这些方法挑战了文化“常识”(Kumashiro,2015),并可以帮助教育工作者和研究人员继续寻找培养(教育)公平、责任和正义的新途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Theory and Research in Social Education
Theory and Research in Social Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
30.80%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信