Free, Bound, and Total Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) during Oxidation of Wines

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
G. Sacks, Patricia A. Howe, M. Standing, J. Danilewicz
{"title":"Free, Bound, and Total Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) during Oxidation of Wines","authors":"G. Sacks, Patricia A. Howe, M. Standing, J. Danilewicz","doi":"10.5344/ajev.2020.19083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent work has evaluated the kinetics of free and total sulfur dioxide (SO2) loss in wine following aerial exposure, but little work exists on the relationship between free and total SO2 during the oxidation conditions expected during wine storage. We report changes in free and total SO2 in three wines (Chardonnay, Merlot, and Cabernet Sauvignon) stored for up to 400 days at 19 or 31°C in different bag-in-box packages. The rate of total SO2 loss varied up to seven-fold for a given wine across storage conditions, e.g., 0.13 to 0.94 mg/L SO2 loss per day for the Chardonnay. Total rates of SO2 loss were linear even after free SO2 was undetectable, and only strongly bound SO2 remained. This finding indicated that bound SO2 adduct hydrolysis was fast, as compared to the rate of SO2 consumption in these packaged wines, likely because the SO2 consumption rate depended on the oxygen ingress rate. Total versus free SO2 plots were linear for free SO2 concentrations greater than ~5 mg/L. The slope (Δtotal/Δfree) of this linear region was wine dependent (Chardonnay = 1.33 to 1.49; Merlot = 1.91 to 2.10; Cabernet Sauvignon = 1.83 to 2.00). In contrast to the rate of total SO2 loss, this ratio varied negligibly with storage conditions, suggesting that minimal formation of new SO2 binders occurred over the course of oxidation. The apparent adduct dissociation equilibrium constant (Kd) of each wine as a function of free SO2 concentration was determined from the first derivative of [Bound]/[Free] versus [Free] plots (“Burroughs plots”). As free SO2 decreased to <10 mg/L, the apparent Kd values decreased to values between 1 × 10-4 M and 10-5 M, which are comparable to those reported for malodorous aldehydes.","PeriodicalId":7461,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Enology and Viticulture","volume":"71 1","pages":"266 - 277"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5344/ajev.2020.19083","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Enology and Viticulture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2020.19083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Recent work has evaluated the kinetics of free and total sulfur dioxide (SO2) loss in wine following aerial exposure, but little work exists on the relationship between free and total SO2 during the oxidation conditions expected during wine storage. We report changes in free and total SO2 in three wines (Chardonnay, Merlot, and Cabernet Sauvignon) stored for up to 400 days at 19 or 31°C in different bag-in-box packages. The rate of total SO2 loss varied up to seven-fold for a given wine across storage conditions, e.g., 0.13 to 0.94 mg/L SO2 loss per day for the Chardonnay. Total rates of SO2 loss were linear even after free SO2 was undetectable, and only strongly bound SO2 remained. This finding indicated that bound SO2 adduct hydrolysis was fast, as compared to the rate of SO2 consumption in these packaged wines, likely because the SO2 consumption rate depended on the oxygen ingress rate. Total versus free SO2 plots were linear for free SO2 concentrations greater than ~5 mg/L. The slope (Δtotal/Δfree) of this linear region was wine dependent (Chardonnay = 1.33 to 1.49; Merlot = 1.91 to 2.10; Cabernet Sauvignon = 1.83 to 2.00). In contrast to the rate of total SO2 loss, this ratio varied negligibly with storage conditions, suggesting that minimal formation of new SO2 binders occurred over the course of oxidation. The apparent adduct dissociation equilibrium constant (Kd) of each wine as a function of free SO2 concentration was determined from the first derivative of [Bound]/[Free] versus [Free] plots (“Burroughs plots”). As free SO2 decreased to <10 mg/L, the apparent Kd values decreased to values between 1 × 10-4 M and 10-5 M, which are comparable to those reported for malodorous aldehydes.
葡萄酒氧化过程中的游离、结合和总二氧化硫(SO2)
最近的工作评估了空气暴露后葡萄酒中游离二氧化硫和总二氧化硫(SO2)损失的动力学,但在葡萄酒储存过程中预期的氧化条件下,游离二氧化硫与总二氧化硫之间的关系研究很少。我们报告了三种葡萄酒(霞多丽、梅洛和赤霞珠)在不同的袋装包装中,在19或31°C下储存长达400天,其游离SO2和总SO2的变化。在不同的储存条件下,给定葡萄酒的总SO2损失率变化高达7倍,例如霞多丽每天损失0.13至0.94 mg/L的SO2。即使在检测不到游离SO2之后,SO2的总损失率也是线性的,并且只剩下强烈结合的SO2。这一发现表明,与这些包装葡萄酒中的SO2消耗速率相比,结合的SO2加合物水解速度很快,可能是因为SO2消耗速率取决于氧气进入速率。游离SO2浓度大于~5 mg/L时,总SO2与游离SO2的关系图呈线性。该线性区域的斜率(Δtotal/Δfree)取决于葡萄酒(霞多丽=1.33至1.49;梅洛=1.91至2.10;赤霞珠=1.83至2.00)。与总SO2损失率相比,该比率随储存条件的变化可忽略不计,这表明在氧化过程中新SO2结合物的形成最小。每种葡萄酒的表观加合物离解平衡常数(Kd)作为游离SO2浓度的函数,由[结合]/[游离]与[游离]图(“Burroughs图”)的一阶导数确定。当游离SO2降至<10mg/L时,表观Kd值降至1×10-4M至10-5M之间,与恶臭醛的报告值相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 农林科学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
27
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Enology and Viticulture (AJEV), published quarterly, is an official journal of the American Society for Enology and Viticulture (ASEV) and is the premier journal in the English language dedicated to scientific research on winemaking and grapegrowing. AJEV publishes full-length research papers, literature reviews, research notes, and technical briefs on various aspects of enology and viticulture, including wine chemistry, sensory science, process engineering, wine quality assessments, microbiology, methods development, plant pathogenesis, diseases and pests of grape, rootstock and clonal evaluation, effect of field practices, and grape genetics and breeding. All papers are peer reviewed, and authorship of papers is not limited to members of ASEV. The science editor, along with the viticulture, enology, and associate editors, are drawn from academic and research institutions worldwide and guide the content of the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信