Race Talk During the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election: Emerging Adults’ Critical Consciousness and Racial Identity in Context

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Ursula Moffitt, L. O. Rogers, Yola Mzizi, Elana Charlson
{"title":"Race Talk During the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election: Emerging Adults’ Critical Consciousness and Racial Identity in Context","authors":"Ursula Moffitt, L. O. Rogers, Yola Mzizi, Elana Charlson","doi":"10.1177/07435584221145009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we drew on the m(ai)cro framework, which centers racism as a macrosystem, to examine how college-going emerging adults made meaning about society and themselves during the 2020 U.S. presidential election and 2021 inauguration. This period was marked by racial justice protests, a global pandemic, anti-Asian violence, and the storming of the U.S. Capitol by predominantly white Trump supporters. Using the constructs of critical consciousness and racial identity meaning making, we analyzed participants’ reports of recent race related conversations. Our sample included 47 students ( Mage = 19.71, SD = 1.72; 81% female, 17% male, 2% other; 45% Asian/Asian American, 30% white, 13% Latinx/Hispanic, 4% Black/African American, 4% Multiracial, 2% Middle Eastern/Arab) at a private, predominantly white university in the U.S. Midwest. Hybrid inductive-deductive analysis showed that a majority reported conversations with peers, focused primarily on racial inequity and justice. For many participants of color, conversations about topics including protests and anti-Asian violence were woven into their racial identities. In contrast, although many white participants discussed events such as the Capitol insurrection, none made links to their racial identities. Our findings highlight connections between critical consciousness and racial identity, and the importance of context and participant positionality in developmental research.","PeriodicalId":47949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescent Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescent Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584221145009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this study, we drew on the m(ai)cro framework, which centers racism as a macrosystem, to examine how college-going emerging adults made meaning about society and themselves during the 2020 U.S. presidential election and 2021 inauguration. This period was marked by racial justice protests, a global pandemic, anti-Asian violence, and the storming of the U.S. Capitol by predominantly white Trump supporters. Using the constructs of critical consciousness and racial identity meaning making, we analyzed participants’ reports of recent race related conversations. Our sample included 47 students ( Mage = 19.71, SD = 1.72; 81% female, 17% male, 2% other; 45% Asian/Asian American, 30% white, 13% Latinx/Hispanic, 4% Black/African American, 4% Multiracial, 2% Middle Eastern/Arab) at a private, predominantly white university in the U.S. Midwest. Hybrid inductive-deductive analysis showed that a majority reported conversations with peers, focused primarily on racial inequity and justice. For many participants of color, conversations about topics including protests and anti-Asian violence were woven into their racial identities. In contrast, although many white participants discussed events such as the Capitol insurrection, none made links to their racial identities. Our findings highlight connections between critical consciousness and racial identity, and the importance of context and participant positionality in developmental research.
2020年美国总统大选期间的种族对话:背景下新兴成年人的批判意识和种族认同
在这项研究中,我们利用m(ai)cro框架,将种族主义作为一个宏观系统来研究在2020年美国总统选举和2021年就职典礼期间,上大学的新兴成年人如何对社会和自己产生意义。这一时期的特点是种族正义抗议、全球疫情、反亚裔暴力,以及以白人为主的特朗普支持者冲击美国国会大厦。利用批判性意识和种族认同意义建构,我们分析了参与者对最近种族相关对话的报告。我们的样本包括47名学生(法师 = 19.71,标准差 = 1.72;81%为女性,17%为男性,2%为其他;45%为亚裔/亚裔美国人,30%为白人,13%为拉丁裔/西班牙裔,4%为黑人/非裔美国人,4%为多种族,2%为中东裔/阿拉伯人)就读于美国中西部一所以白人为主的私立大学。混合归纳演绎分析显示,大多数人报告了与同龄人的对话,主要集中在种族不平等和正义上。对于许多有色人种参与者来说,关于抗议和反亚裔暴力等话题的对话融入了他们的种族身份。相比之下,尽管许多白人参与者讨论了国会暴动等事件,但没有人将其与种族身份联系起来。我们的发现强调了批判性意识和种族认同之间的联系,以及语境和参与者地位在发展研究中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Adolescent Research
Journal of Adolescent Research PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Adolescent Research is to publish lively, creative, and informative articles on development during adolescence (ages 10-18) and emerging adulthood (ages 18-25). The journal encourages papers that use qualitative, ethnographic, or other methods that present the voices of adolescents. Few strictly quantitative, questionnaire-based articles are published in the Journal of Adolescent Research, unless they break new ground in a previously understudied area. However, papers that combine qualitative and quantitative data are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信