{"title":"A la praxis por el retorno a la dialéctica (o sobre el “leninismo” de Th. W. Adorno)","authors":"Marcela Vélez León","doi":"10.15366/BP2019.21.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl objetivo del presente articulo es analizar el alcance que sobre el desarrollo filosofico de Theodor W. Adorno pudiera haber ejercido la figura de Lenin. ?Cabe decir que Adorno fuera “leninista”? Toda vez que las referencias a Lenin son mas bien escasas en el corpus bibliografico de Adorno, resulta cuando menos llamativo que este le propusiera a Max Horkheimer realizar un “manifiesto estrictamente leninista” en 1956. Para profundizar en este interrogante sera esencial reflexionar sobre el devenir de la nocion de “praxis” a comienzos del siglo XX, especialmente en su vinculo con el pensamiento dialectico heredado de la filosofia hegeliana EnglishThe aim of this article is to analyse the scope that Lenin’s figure could have exerted on Theodor W. Adorno’s philosophical development. Could be said that Adorno was “Leninist”? Since references to Lenin are rather scarce in Adorno’s bibliographic corpus, it is at least striking that Adorno proposed to Max Horkheimer to make a “strictly Leninist Manifest” in 1956. To deepen this question, it will be essential to reflect on the evolution of the notion of “praxis” at the beginning of the 20th century, especially in its link with the dialectical thought inherited from Hegelian philosophy","PeriodicalId":40614,"journal":{"name":"Bajo Palabra-Journal of Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bajo Palabra-Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15366/BP2019.21.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
espanolEl objetivo del presente articulo es analizar el alcance que sobre el desarrollo filosofico de Theodor W. Adorno pudiera haber ejercido la figura de Lenin. ?Cabe decir que Adorno fuera “leninista”? Toda vez que las referencias a Lenin son mas bien escasas en el corpus bibliografico de Adorno, resulta cuando menos llamativo que este le propusiera a Max Horkheimer realizar un “manifiesto estrictamente leninista” en 1956. Para profundizar en este interrogante sera esencial reflexionar sobre el devenir de la nocion de “praxis” a comienzos del siglo XX, especialmente en su vinculo con el pensamiento dialectico heredado de la filosofia hegeliana EnglishThe aim of this article is to analyse the scope that Lenin’s figure could have exerted on Theodor W. Adorno’s philosophical development. Could be said that Adorno was “Leninist”? Since references to Lenin are rather scarce in Adorno’s bibliographic corpus, it is at least striking that Adorno proposed to Max Horkheimer to make a “strictly Leninist Manifest” in 1956. To deepen this question, it will be essential to reflect on the evolution of the notion of “praxis” at the beginning of the 20th century, especially in its link with the dialectical thought inherited from Hegelian philosophy