{"title":"Teachers’ gendered perceptions of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder – a literature review","authors":"Å. Olsson","doi":"10.1080/08856257.2022.2076476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study provides a systematic review of previous research about teachers’ gendered perceptions of pupils with diagnoses or symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This review was conducted using the databases Scopus, Web of Science and ERIC. Nineteen articles were selected after narrowing down a total of 121 articles, in accordance with inclusion criteria. In sum, previous research concludes that teachers’ identification, assessment and attitudes related to pupils with ADHD diagnoses or symptoms are associated with the pupils’ gender. When pupils exhibit academic, emotional or behavioural difficulties, teachers assess girls’ impairments more severe than boys’ impairments. Nevertheless, teachers are more likely to recommend treatment, counselling and/or medication to boys than to girls. While teachers’ perceptions of pupils’ difficulties are gendered, strategies or methods for teaching pupils with ADHD seem not to be. In the articles included in this review, there are hardly any examples given of gender-sensitive teaching methods. Furthermore, it is concluded that regardless of gender aspects, a deficit perspective dominates in research presented in this article, and it appears that children are held responsible for school difficulties while the school setting is not.","PeriodicalId":47639,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Special Needs Education","volume":"38 1","pages":"303 - 316"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Special Needs Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2022.2076476","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study provides a systematic review of previous research about teachers’ gendered perceptions of pupils with diagnoses or symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This review was conducted using the databases Scopus, Web of Science and ERIC. Nineteen articles were selected after narrowing down a total of 121 articles, in accordance with inclusion criteria. In sum, previous research concludes that teachers’ identification, assessment and attitudes related to pupils with ADHD diagnoses or symptoms are associated with the pupils’ gender. When pupils exhibit academic, emotional or behavioural difficulties, teachers assess girls’ impairments more severe than boys’ impairments. Nevertheless, teachers are more likely to recommend treatment, counselling and/or medication to boys than to girls. While teachers’ perceptions of pupils’ difficulties are gendered, strategies or methods for teaching pupils with ADHD seem not to be. In the articles included in this review, there are hardly any examples given of gender-sensitive teaching methods. Furthermore, it is concluded that regardless of gender aspects, a deficit perspective dominates in research presented in this article, and it appears that children are held responsible for school difficulties while the school setting is not.
摘要本研究系统回顾了以往关于教师对患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)诊断或症状的学生的性别认知的研究。本综述使用Scopus、Web of Science和ERIC数据库进行。根据纳入标准,在将总共121篇文章缩小后,选择了19篇文章。总之,先前的研究得出结论,教师对患有多动症诊断或症状的学生的识别、评估和态度与学生的性别有关。当学生表现出学业、情绪或行为困难时,教师会评估女孩的障碍比男孩的障碍更严重。然而,与女孩相比,教师更有可能向男孩推荐治疗、咨询和/或药物。虽然教师对学生困难的看法是性别化的,但教授多动症学生的策略或方法似乎不是。在本综述中的文章中,几乎没有任何对性别敏感的教学方法的例子。此外,得出的结论是,无论性别方面如何,在本文提出的研究中,赤字观点占主导地位,而且似乎儿童应对学校困难负责,而学校环境则不然。
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Special Needs Education reflects the dynamic growth of the theory and practice of special needs education as it is emerging worldwide. Written for teachers and researchers it provides a forum for reporting and reviewing scholarly research and significant developments in the field of special educational needs.