Short Physical Performance Battery reliability and validity in adults with mild to moderate intellectual disability

IF 1.9 4区医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL

Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability Pub Date : 2023-02-23 DOI:10.3109/13668250.2023.2166198

I. Bidaurrazaga-Letona, J. Diz, J. Torres-Unda, I. Esain, X. Monasterio, Biotz Zulueta, C. Ayán

{"title":"Short Physical Performance Battery reliability and validity in adults with mild to moderate intellectual disability","authors":"I. Bidaurrazaga-Letona, J. Diz, J. Torres-Unda, I. Esain, X. Monasterio, Biotz Zulueta, C. Ayán","doi":"10.3109/13668250.2023.2166198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n Background People with intellectual disability have poor balance skills and greater fall risk. The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) provides comprehensive information on functional status and can predict fall risk. However, the reliability and validity of the SPPB have not been evaluated in people with intellectual disability. Methods Seventy-eight adults with intellectual disability were assessed using the SPPB twice. Reliability was analysed with intraclass correlation coefficient and validity was assessed against the Timed Up & Go (TUG) test and the stabilometric test using Spearman’s rho. Results Reliability was moderate to high in all SPPB components except for the semi-tandem and full tandem positions. The SPPB summary score indicated moderate test–retest reliability and showed mostly significant moderate associations with the TUG and poor agreement with the stabilometric test. Conclusions The SPPB summary score indicated high internal consistency, moderate reliability, and moderate validity when applied to adults with intellectual disability.","PeriodicalId":51466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","volume":"48 1","pages":"238 - 246"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2023.2166198","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background People with intellectual disability have poor balance skills and greater fall risk. The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) provides comprehensive information on functional status and can predict fall risk. However, the reliability and validity of the SPPB have not been evaluated in people with intellectual disability. Methods Seventy-eight adults with intellectual disability were assessed using the SPPB twice. Reliability was analysed with intraclass correlation coefficient and validity was assessed against the Timed Up & Go (TUG) test and the stabilometric test using Spearman’s rho. Results Reliability was moderate to high in all SPPB components except for the semi-tandem and full tandem positions. The SPPB summary score indicated moderate test–retest reliability and showed mostly significant moderate associations with the TUG and poor agreement with the stabilometric test. Conclusions The SPPB summary score indicated high internal consistency, moderate reliability, and moderate validity when applied to adults with intellectual disability.

查看原文本刊更多论文

轻度至中度智力残疾成年人短体力测试的信度和有效性

摘要背景智力残疾的人平衡能力差，跌倒的风险更大。短物理性能电池（SPPB）可提供有关功能状态的全面信息，并可预测跌倒风险。然而，SPPB的可靠性和有效性尚未在智力残疾人群中进行评估。方法采用SPPB对78名智力残疾成年人进行两次评估。用组内相关系数分析了信度，并用Spearman的rho对定时上下（TUG）测试和稳定性测试的有效性进行了评估。结果除半串联和全串联位置外，所有SPPB组件的可靠性均为中高。SPPB汇总得分表明测试-再测试的可靠性中等，与TUG的相关性大多为显著-中等，与稳定性测试的一致性较差。结论SPPB总分在应用于成人智力残疾时具有较高的内部一致性、中等的可靠性和中等的有效性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability Multiple-

CiteScore

3.40

自引率

7.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability (formerly the Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities) is the official journal of the Australasian Society for the Study of Intellectual Disability (ASSID). JIDD is an international, multidisciplinary journal in the field of intellectual and developmental disability. The journal publishes original qualitative and quantitative research papers, literature reviews, conceptual articles, brief reports, case reports, data briefs, and opinions and perspectives.