Microbiological sampling and analyses in the food business operators’ HACCP-based self-control programmes

Mariel Stefhanie Aybar Espinoza, Catarina Flink, N. Boisen, F. Scheutz, A. Käsbohrer
{"title":"Microbiological sampling and analyses in the food business operators’ HACCP-based self-control programmes","authors":"Mariel Stefhanie Aybar Espinoza, Catarina Flink, N. Boisen, F. Scheutz, A. Käsbohrer","doi":"10.3389/frfst.2023.1110359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A questionnaire was developed within the OH-HARMONY-CAP project providing an overview of current procedures for microbiological sampling and analyses in food business operators’ HACCP-based self-control programmes in EU/EEA countries. It focused on six bacterial species: Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Campylobacter spp., Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, Shigella spp. and Yersinia spp.; and five parasites: Trichinella spp., Cryptosporidium spp., Echinococcus granulosus (Sensu lato), Echinococcus multilocularis and Toxoplasma gondii. Participating EU/EEA countries distributed the questionnaire to food business operators’ laboratories within their countries and responses were received from nine countries. Feedback from 35 laboratories among 554 were considered for data analysis. Results showed that dairy products were analysed most frequently and the majority of laboratories analysed both ready-to-eat and non-ready-to-eat products. Laboratories analysing Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes processed the majority of samples. Accreditation for ISO-standards or an alternative method was in place in a considerable proportion of laboratories, but did not cover all pathogens investigated. Sending isolates for further confirmation to external laboratories was not common. In contrast, storing isolates was more frequently established. Around 60% of laboratories used more than one typing or characterisation method, predominantly MALDI-TOF, antimicrobial resistance typing and PCR, while 40% did not use any of these methods. Variability was observed as regards use of Whole Genome Sequencing; and participation in External Quality Assessment programmes. The study gathered insight into current practices of microbiological sampling and analyses performed in food business operators’ HACCP-based self-control programmes, and showed that further efforts are needed for harmonisation of analytical protocols and characterisation of foodborne pathogens.","PeriodicalId":93753,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in food science and technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in food science and technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frfst.2023.1110359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A questionnaire was developed within the OH-HARMONY-CAP project providing an overview of current procedures for microbiological sampling and analyses in food business operators’ HACCP-based self-control programmes in EU/EEA countries. It focused on six bacterial species: Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Campylobacter spp., Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, Shigella spp. and Yersinia spp.; and five parasites: Trichinella spp., Cryptosporidium spp., Echinococcus granulosus (Sensu lato), Echinococcus multilocularis and Toxoplasma gondii. Participating EU/EEA countries distributed the questionnaire to food business operators’ laboratories within their countries and responses were received from nine countries. Feedback from 35 laboratories among 554 were considered for data analysis. Results showed that dairy products were analysed most frequently and the majority of laboratories analysed both ready-to-eat and non-ready-to-eat products. Laboratories analysing Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes processed the majority of samples. Accreditation for ISO-standards or an alternative method was in place in a considerable proportion of laboratories, but did not cover all pathogens investigated. Sending isolates for further confirmation to external laboratories was not common. In contrast, storing isolates was more frequently established. Around 60% of laboratories used more than one typing or characterisation method, predominantly MALDI-TOF, antimicrobial resistance typing and PCR, while 40% did not use any of these methods. Variability was observed as regards use of Whole Genome Sequencing; and participation in External Quality Assessment programmes. The study gathered insight into current practices of microbiological sampling and analyses performed in food business operators’ HACCP-based self-control programmes, and showed that further efforts are needed for harmonisation of analytical protocols and characterisation of foodborne pathogens.
食品经营者基于HACCP的自我控制计划中的微生物取样和分析
OH-HARMONY-CAP项目编制了一份问卷,概述了欧盟/欧洲经济区国家食品企业经营者基于HACCP的自我控制计划中微生物采样和分析的现行程序。它重点关注六种细菌:沙门氏菌属、单核细胞增生性李斯特菌、弯曲杆菌属、产志贺毒素的大肠杆菌、志贺菌属和耶尔森菌属。;五种寄生虫:旋毛虫、隐孢子虫、细粒棘球蚴、多房棘球蚴和弓形虫。参与调查的欧盟/欧洲经济区国家向其国家内的食品经营者实验室分发了调查表,并收到了9个国家的答复。对554个实验室中的35个实验室的反馈进行了数据分析。结果显示,乳制品的分析频率最高,大多数实验室同时分析即食和非即食产品。分析沙门氏菌和李斯特菌的实验室处理了大部分样本。相当一部分实验室已经获得了ISO标准或替代方法的认证,但并没有涵盖所调查的所有病原体。将分离株送往外部实验室进行进一步确认并不常见。相比之下,储存分离株的建立频率更高。大约60%的实验室使用了一种以上的分型或表征方法,主要是MALDI-TOF、抗微生物耐药性分型和PCR,而40%的实验室没有使用任何这些方法。在全基因组测序的使用方面观察到变异性;以及参与外部质量评估方案。该研究深入了解了食品经营者基于HACCP的自我控制计划中微生物采样和分析的当前实践,并表明需要进一步努力协调分析方案和食源性病原体的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信