Mitigating supply-demand mismatch: The relationship between inventory sharing and demand learning

IF 2.8 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Liqun Wei, Wanying Wei, Yunchuan Liu, Jianxiong Zhang, Xuanhua Xu
{"title":"Mitigating supply-demand mismatch: The relationship between inventory sharing and demand learning","authors":"Liqun Wei,&nbsp;Wanying Wei,&nbsp;Yunchuan Liu,&nbsp;Jianxiong Zhang,&nbsp;Xuanhua Xu","doi":"10.1111/deci.12611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>By mitigating supply-demand mismatch through advanced forecast technology, demand learning has attracted widespread attention and is increasingly adopted in conjunction with inventory sharing. However, this combination is not necessarily efficient given the unclear relationship between the two strategies. Therefore, crucially, this article investigates the strategic relationship between inventory sharing and demand learning, that is, when and whether they are substitutes or complements. We develop a theoretical game model consisting of two firms facing uncertain demand, and both of them need to determine their production quantity before demand is realized. Contrary to the intuition that demand learning is a substitute for inventory sharing, we find that these two strategies can be complements when the production cost is relatively low or high. Moreover, when forecast accuracy is relatively low, the substitutability will be weakened while the complementarity will be enhanced as forecast accuracy increases. Additionally, the substitutability first weakly decreases and then weakly increases, while the complementarity first weakly increases and then weakly decreases with the transfer price.</p>","PeriodicalId":48256,"journal":{"name":"DECISION SCIENCES","volume":"55 6","pages":"533-548"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DECISION SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/deci.12611","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By mitigating supply-demand mismatch through advanced forecast technology, demand learning has attracted widespread attention and is increasingly adopted in conjunction with inventory sharing. However, this combination is not necessarily efficient given the unclear relationship between the two strategies. Therefore, crucially, this article investigates the strategic relationship between inventory sharing and demand learning, that is, when and whether they are substitutes or complements. We develop a theoretical game model consisting of two firms facing uncertain demand, and both of them need to determine their production quantity before demand is realized. Contrary to the intuition that demand learning is a substitute for inventory sharing, we find that these two strategies can be complements when the production cost is relatively low or high. Moreover, when forecast accuracy is relatively low, the substitutability will be weakened while the complementarity will be enhanced as forecast accuracy increases. Additionally, the substitutability first weakly decreases and then weakly increases, while the complementarity first weakly increases and then weakly decreases with the transfer price.

缓解供需不匹配:库存共享与需求学习之间的关系
通过先进的预测技术来缓解供需不匹配,需求学习已经引起了广泛的关注,并越来越多地与库存共享相结合。然而,鉴于两种策略之间的关系不明确,这种组合不一定有效。因此,至关重要的是,本文研究了库存共享和需求学习之间的战略关系,即何时以及它们是替代还是补充。建立了两家企业面对不确定需求的理论博弈模型,两家企业都需要在需求实现前确定自己的产量。与需求学习替代库存共享的直觉相反,我们发现当生产成本相对较低或较高时,这两种策略可以互补。而且,当预报精度较低时,随着预报精度的提高,可替代性会减弱,互补性会增强。可替代性随转移价格先弱减小后弱增大,互补性随转移价格先弱增大后弱减小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
DECISION SCIENCES
DECISION SCIENCES MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Decision Sciences, a premier journal of the Decision Sciences Institute, publishes scholarly research about decision making within the boundaries of an organization, as well as decisions involving inter-firm coordination. The journal promotes research advancing decision making at the interfaces of business functions and organizational boundaries. The journal also seeks articles extending established lines of work assuming the results of the research have the potential to substantially impact either decision making theory or industry practice. Ground-breaking research articles that enhance managerial understanding of decision making processes and stimulate further research in multi-disciplinary domains are particularly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信