Real world reflection: how physiotherapists experience reflection in their practice

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jayne Dalley-Hewer, D. Clouder, M. Jones
{"title":"Real world reflection: how physiotherapists experience reflection in their practice","authors":"Jayne Dalley-Hewer, D. Clouder, M. Jones","doi":"10.1080/14623943.2022.2143340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper explores the nature of reflection that qualified physiotherapists use in their day-to-day practice. This is an area in which there is a dearth of research. With a grounded theory approach purposive sampling was used to recruit seven qualified physiotherapists for photo-elicitation interviews exploring whether they did reflect and if so, what their reflection was like. The findings were that they did reflect but that it occurred outside of working hours. Four conceptual categories were identified: Personal Concept, Personal Process, Time and Head-Space. Practitioners had their own ideas of what reflection was, own ways of reflecting and personal strategies for making the head space to reflect in. Typically, they used thinking modes of reflection, with occasional dialogical modes; written reflection was rare. Of novel significance was the use of strategies to complete reflection to their satisfaction, most frequently walking but also preparing vegetables, driving and showering, typically outside of work hours. The use of such cognitively non-demanding, routinised activities to aid reflection has not been widely explored in the literature on reflection and may suggest a need to rethink approaches to support the teaching of reflection which would have high validity for its place in the real world of practice.","PeriodicalId":51594,"journal":{"name":"Reflective Practice","volume":"24 1","pages":"85 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reflective Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2022.2143340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper explores the nature of reflection that qualified physiotherapists use in their day-to-day practice. This is an area in which there is a dearth of research. With a grounded theory approach purposive sampling was used to recruit seven qualified physiotherapists for photo-elicitation interviews exploring whether they did reflect and if so, what their reflection was like. The findings were that they did reflect but that it occurred outside of working hours. Four conceptual categories were identified: Personal Concept, Personal Process, Time and Head-Space. Practitioners had their own ideas of what reflection was, own ways of reflecting and personal strategies for making the head space to reflect in. Typically, they used thinking modes of reflection, with occasional dialogical modes; written reflection was rare. Of novel significance was the use of strategies to complete reflection to their satisfaction, most frequently walking but also preparing vegetables, driving and showering, typically outside of work hours. The use of such cognitively non-demanding, routinised activities to aid reflection has not been widely explored in the literature on reflection and may suggest a need to rethink approaches to support the teaching of reflection which would have high validity for its place in the real world of practice.
真实世界的反思:物理治疗师如何在实践中体验反思
摘要本文探讨了合格理疗师在日常实践中使用反思的本质。这是一个缺乏研究的领域。采用有根据的理论方法,采用有目的的抽样方法招募了七名合格的理疗师进行照片启发访谈,探讨他们是否进行了反思,如果进行了反思的话,他们的反思是什么样的。调查结果表明,他们确实反映了这一点,但这是在工作时间之外发生的。确定了四个概念类别:个人概念、个人过程、时间和头部空间。从业者对什么是反思有自己的想法,有自己的反思方式,也有个人的策略来创造反思的头部空间。通常,他们使用反思的思维模式,偶尔也会使用对话模式;书面反思是罕见的。具有新颖意义的是使用策略来完成他们满意的反思,最频繁的是走路,但也要准备蔬菜、开车和洗澡,通常是在工作时间之外。使用这种认知上无要求、常规的活动来帮助反思在反思文献中尚未得到广泛探索,这可能表明有必要重新思考支持反思教学的方法,因为反思在现实世界中的地位具有很高的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reflective Practice
Reflective Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信