{"title":"Enacting Thinking: Supporting Teacher Candidates in Modeling Writing Strategies","authors":"Chandra Alston, Katie A. Danielson","doi":"10.1080/19388071.2020.1822475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Instructor modeling of metacognitive processes has been shown to support student learning. Teacher educators have leveraged this research to support teacher candidates in framing, decomposing, and explaining disciplinary thinking and decision-making, particularly in reading development. However, little work has focused on supporting teacher candidates’ use of similar pedagogical moves when teaching writing. This project investigated teacher candidates modeling of writing before and after instruction aimed to support their ability to model. What we noticed was a trajectory of learning to frame, decompose, explain, and highlight writing content using visual and metacognitive representations to make the cognitive processes of writing more visible. However, we noted places for growth in teacher candidates’ knowledge of content and students, so that candidates might more aptly decompose and highlight their disciplinary thinking in ways that are appropriate for the teaching context.","PeriodicalId":45434,"journal":{"name":"Literacy Research and Instruction","volume":"60 1","pages":"199 - 219"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388071.2020.1822475","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literacy Research and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2020.1822475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
ABSTRACT Instructor modeling of metacognitive processes has been shown to support student learning. Teacher educators have leveraged this research to support teacher candidates in framing, decomposing, and explaining disciplinary thinking and decision-making, particularly in reading development. However, little work has focused on supporting teacher candidates’ use of similar pedagogical moves when teaching writing. This project investigated teacher candidates modeling of writing before and after instruction aimed to support their ability to model. What we noticed was a trajectory of learning to frame, decompose, explain, and highlight writing content using visual and metacognitive representations to make the cognitive processes of writing more visible. However, we noted places for growth in teacher candidates’ knowledge of content and students, so that candidates might more aptly decompose and highlight their disciplinary thinking in ways that are appropriate for the teaching context.
期刊介绍:
Literacy Research and Instruction (formerly Reading Research and Instruction), the official journal of the College Reading Association, is an international refereed professional journal that publishes articles dealing with research and instruction in reading education and allied literacy fields. The journal is especially focused on instructional practices and applied or basic research of special interest to reading and literacy educators. Peer Review Policy: All articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by reviewers.