Examining the Language Interactions between a Teacher Educator and Preservice Teachers during Collaborative Planning for Literacy Instruction

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Literacy Research and Instruction Pub Date : 2020-09-27 DOI:10.1080/19388071.2020.1805058

Andrea Gelfuso

引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper reports findings from a formative design experiment during which the practical problem of how to support 31 preservice teachers as they approximated planning for ambitious literacy instruction was examined. Collaborative planning conversations between the PSTs and a teacher educator were analyzed. Discourse analysis revealed a macrostructure of anticipatory reflection that included (1) describing the literacy practices of the child (2) determining the learning goal for the child (3) planning for interaction with the child and (4) planning for lesson closure and transfer. Specific language interactions that supported anticipatory reflection are detailed and A Framework for Facilitating Collaborative Planning Conversations along with a Decision-Making Tool for Planning is offered.

查看原文本刊更多论文

考察教师教育者与职前教师在扫盲教学协同规划中的语言互动

摘要本文报告了一项形成性设计实验的结果，在该实验中，研究了如何支持31名职前教师制定雄心勃勃的识字教学计划的实际问题。分析了PST和教师教育工作者之间的合作计划对话。语篇分析揭示了预期反思的宏观结构，包括（1）描述儿童的识字实践；（2）确定儿童的学习目标；（3）计划与儿童互动；（4）计划课程结束和转移。详细介绍了支持预期反思的具体语言互动，并提供了一个促进合作规划对话的框架以及一个规划决策工具。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Literacy Research and Instruction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

8.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Literacy Research and Instruction (formerly Reading Research and Instruction), the official journal of the College Reading Association, is an international refereed professional journal that publishes articles dealing with research and instruction in reading education and allied literacy fields. The journal is especially focused on instructional practices and applied or basic research of special interest to reading and literacy educators. Peer Review Policy: All articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by reviewers.