Is my opinion important in evaluating lecturers? Students’ perceptions of student evaluations of teaching (SET) and their relationship to SET scores

IF 2.3 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Educational Research and Evaluation Pub Date : 2022-02-17 DOI:10.1080/13803611.2021.2022318

Noemí Suárez Monzón, Vanessa Gómez Suárez, Diego Gudberto Lara Paredes

{"title":"Is my opinion important in evaluating lecturers? Students’ perceptions of student evaluations of teaching (SET) and their relationship to SET scores","authors":"Noemí Suárez Monzón, Vanessa Gómez Suárez, Diego Gudberto Lara Paredes","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2021.2022318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Previous studies have identified a positive relationship between students’ perceptions of student evaluations of teaching (SET) and the grades that students provide in SET, controlling for other bias factors. The research by Spooren and Christiaens in 2017 at the University of Antwerp supported this finding. In this study, the methodology used by Spooren and Christiaens was replicated at the Technological Indoamerica University in Ecuador, in a close conceptual replication. In the replicated study, 967 undergraduate participants answered the questionnaires used by the original authors. The replication study sample was very similar in size, seniority, and gender to the original study but not in academic disciplines studied. Most of the students agreed that the evaluation was relevant and could improve teaching practices. Results show a statistically significant but small positive relation among perceptions of SET and SET scores (0.20 for the Belgian university and 0.27 for the Ecuadorian university).","PeriodicalId":47025,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research and Evaluation","volume":"27 1","pages":"117 - 140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2021.2022318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT Previous studies have identified a positive relationship between students’ perceptions of student evaluations of teaching (SET) and the grades that students provide in SET, controlling for other bias factors. The research by Spooren and Christiaens in 2017 at the University of Antwerp supported this finding. In this study, the methodology used by Spooren and Christiaens was replicated at the Technological Indoamerica University in Ecuador, in a close conceptual replication. In the replicated study, 967 undergraduate participants answered the questionnaires used by the original authors. The replication study sample was very similar in size, seniority, and gender to the original study but not in academic disciplines studied. Most of the students agreed that the evaluation was relevant and could improve teaching practices. Results show a statistically significant but small positive relation among perceptions of SET and SET scores (0.20 for the Belgian university and 0.27 for the Ecuadorian university).

查看原文本刊更多论文

我的意见对评价讲师很重要吗?学生对学生评价教学(SET)的看法及其与SET分数的关系

摘要先前的研究已经确定，在控制其他偏见因素的情况下，学生对学生教学评价（SET）的感知与学生在SET中提供的成绩之间存在正相关关系。Spooren和Christiaens于2017年在安特卫普大学的研究支持了这一发现。在这项研究中，Spooren和Christiaens使用的方法在厄瓜多尔的中南美洲科技大学进行了概念复制。在重复研究中，967名本科生参与者回答了原作者使用的问卷。复制研究样本在规模、资历和性别上与原始研究非常相似，但在所研究的学科中没有。大多数学生一致认为，评估是相关的，可以改进教学实践。结果显示，对SET的认知与SET分数之间存在统计学上显著但较小的正相关关系（比利时大学为0.20，厄瓜多尔大学为0.27）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Educational Research and Evaluation EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： International, comparative and multidisciplinary in scope, Educational Research and Evaluation (ERE) publishes original, peer-reviewed academic articles dealing with research on issues of worldwide relevance in educational practice. The aim of the journal is to increase understanding of learning in pre-primary, primary, high school, college, university and adult education, and to contribute to the improvement of educational processes and outcomes. The journal seeks to promote cross-national and international comparative educational research by publishing findings relevant to the scholarly community, as well as to practitioners and others interested in education. The scope of the journal is deliberately broad in terms of both topics covered and disciplinary perspective.