Dialogues between Ivan and Smerdyakov after the murder of their father from The Brothers Karamazov: their educational implications

IF 0.7 2区 哲学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
E. Saito
{"title":"Dialogues between Ivan and Smerdyakov after the murder of their father from The Brothers Karamazov: their educational implications","authors":"E. Saito","doi":"10.1080/01416200.2023.2193675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the modern world, alienation and marginalisation are serious issues that make people doubt the existence of God. Due to the development of science and technology, which allows humans more space to act as they desire, society has become even more secularised. Fyodor Dostoevsky foresaw and struggled with these problems – as represented in his literary masterpieces, such as The Brothers Karamazov. However, his works are rarely discussed in educational fields. This study, therefore, aims to analyse and obtain educational implications from the dialogues between Ivan Fyodorovich Karamazov and Pavel Fyodorovich Smerdyakov during three visits after the murder of their father, Fyodor Pavlovich Karamazov, in The Brothers Karamazov. Ivan rebelled against God because of the injustice in this world, while Smerdyakov had been a victim of such injustice from his birth. They cooperated based on the Man-God ideology advocated by Ivan. However, it did not liberate them; rather, they awoke with a sense of guilt. For educational implications, while Ivan did not consider Smerdyakov an equal, ‘good people’ treated them differently. They supported Smerdyakov and Ivan with care and realist senses by not only supporting the brothers in any situation but also predicting and accepting undesirable scenarios for them.","PeriodicalId":46368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Religious Education","volume":"45 1","pages":"347 - 357"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Religious Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2023.2193675","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the modern world, alienation and marginalisation are serious issues that make people doubt the existence of God. Due to the development of science and technology, which allows humans more space to act as they desire, society has become even more secularised. Fyodor Dostoevsky foresaw and struggled with these problems – as represented in his literary masterpieces, such as The Brothers Karamazov. However, his works are rarely discussed in educational fields. This study, therefore, aims to analyse and obtain educational implications from the dialogues between Ivan Fyodorovich Karamazov and Pavel Fyodorovich Smerdyakov during three visits after the murder of their father, Fyodor Pavlovich Karamazov, in The Brothers Karamazov. Ivan rebelled against God because of the injustice in this world, while Smerdyakov had been a victim of such injustice from his birth. They cooperated based on the Man-God ideology advocated by Ivan. However, it did not liberate them; rather, they awoke with a sense of guilt. For educational implications, while Ivan did not consider Smerdyakov an equal, ‘good people’ treated them differently. They supported Smerdyakov and Ivan with care and realist senses by not only supporting the brothers in any situation but also predicting and accepting undesirable scenarios for them.
《卡拉马佐夫兄弟》中伊凡和斯梅尔迪亚科夫在父亲被谋杀后的对话:他们的教育意义
摘要在现代世界中,异化和边缘化是一个严重的问题,使人们怀疑上帝的存在。由于科学技术的发展,人类有了更多的空间来随心所欲,社会变得更加世俗化。费奥多尔·陀思妥耶夫斯基预见到并与这些问题作斗争——正如他的文学杰作《卡拉马佐夫兄弟》所代表的那样。然而,他的作品很少在教育领域被讨论。因此,本研究旨在分析伊万·费奥多罗维奇·卡拉马佐夫和帕维尔·费奥多洛维奇·斯梅尔迪亚科夫在《卡拉马佐夫兄弟》中的父亲费奥多尔·巴甫洛维奇·卡拉玛佐夫被谋杀后的三次访问中的对话,并从中获得教育启示。伊凡因为这个世界上的不公正而反抗上帝,而斯梅尔迪亚科夫从出生起就是这种不公正的受害者。他们的合作基于伊凡倡导的人神思想。然而,它并没有解放他们;相反,他们醒来时感到内疚。就教育意义而言,虽然伊万并不认为斯梅尔迪亚科夫是平等的,但“好人”对待他们的方式不同。他们以谨慎和现实主义的态度支持斯梅尔迪亚科夫和伊万,不仅在任何情况下支持兄弟俩,而且预测和接受他们不希望发生的事情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Religious Education (BJRE) is an international peer-reviewed journal which has a pedigree stretching back to 1934 when it began life as Religion in Education. In 1961 the title was changed to Learning for Living, and the present title was adopted in 1978. It is the leading journal in Britain for the dissemination of international research in religion and education and for the scholarly discussion of issues concerning religion and education internationally. The British Journal of Religious Education promotes research which contributes to our understanding of the relationship between religion and education in all phases of formal and non-formal educational settings. BJRE publishes articles which are national, international and transnational in scope from researchers working in any discipline whose work informs debate in religious education. Topics might include religious education policy curriculum and pedagogy, research on religion and young people, or the influence of religion(s) and non-religious worldviews upon the educational process as a whole.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信