Older adults’ experiences of a computerised cognitive training intervention: a mixed methods study

IF 3.6 4区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
K. Trenorden, M. Hull, A. Lampit, D. Greaves, H. Keage
{"title":"Older adults’ experiences of a computerised cognitive training intervention: a mixed methods study","authors":"K. Trenorden, M. Hull, A. Lampit, D. Greaves, H. Keage","doi":"10.1080/00049530.2022.2036581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective Computerised cognitive training (CCT) is gaining in popularity and has shown evidence of efficacy in improving cognitive function. Older adults’ experiences of a CCT intervention were explored using mixed methods, focussing on computer literacy and engagement. Methods Seven older adults completed pre-operative CCT (pre-habilitation) and a 12-week post-operative CCT (rehabilitation) intervention as part of an ongoing clinical trial. Qualitative interviews were conducted post-training to explore CCT experiences and data were analysed using thematic analysis. Three questionnaires were used to characterise participants: Computer Proficiency Questionnaire-12, Short Computer Anxiety Scale, User-Engagement Scale-Short Form. Results Four key themes were identified from the interview data: “I appreciate a challenge”, “Persevering through frustration led to accomplishment”, “When I start, I finish”, and “It’s manageable but with support”. Conclusion All participants had positive CCT experiences, including those with low computer-literacy skills. CCT interventions should consider utilising regular supervised sessions, and achievable, challenging exercises, while focussing on reducing frustration to improve experiences with CCT. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: Computerised cognitive training (CCT) has demonstrated evidence for improving overall and domain-specific cognitive function in healthy older adults, and older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Low adherence is common in CCT interventions, which limits beneficial cognitive outcomes. Negative experiences in CCT interventions are major drivers of non-adherence and attrition. What this topic adds: Experiences during CCT often fluctuate, and frustration occurs when participants compare their perceived and actual abilities. Recommendations from qualitative interviews include the use of attainable, challenging exercises that can be completed more efficiently with improved skill. Support strategies contributed to positive experiences overall and included regular supervised sessions (e.g., once a week), phone numbers to call for assistance, and screen sharing software to resolve computer problems.","PeriodicalId":8871,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2022.2036581","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective Computerised cognitive training (CCT) is gaining in popularity and has shown evidence of efficacy in improving cognitive function. Older adults’ experiences of a CCT intervention were explored using mixed methods, focussing on computer literacy and engagement. Methods Seven older adults completed pre-operative CCT (pre-habilitation) and a 12-week post-operative CCT (rehabilitation) intervention as part of an ongoing clinical trial. Qualitative interviews were conducted post-training to explore CCT experiences and data were analysed using thematic analysis. Three questionnaires were used to characterise participants: Computer Proficiency Questionnaire-12, Short Computer Anxiety Scale, User-Engagement Scale-Short Form. Results Four key themes were identified from the interview data: “I appreciate a challenge”, “Persevering through frustration led to accomplishment”, “When I start, I finish”, and “It’s manageable but with support”. Conclusion All participants had positive CCT experiences, including those with low computer-literacy skills. CCT interventions should consider utilising regular supervised sessions, and achievable, challenging exercises, while focussing on reducing frustration to improve experiences with CCT. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: Computerised cognitive training (CCT) has demonstrated evidence for improving overall and domain-specific cognitive function in healthy older adults, and older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Low adherence is common in CCT interventions, which limits beneficial cognitive outcomes. Negative experiences in CCT interventions are major drivers of non-adherence and attrition. What this topic adds: Experiences during CCT often fluctuate, and frustration occurs when participants compare their perceived and actual abilities. Recommendations from qualitative interviews include the use of attainable, challenging exercises that can be completed more efficiently with improved skill. Support strategies contributed to positive experiences overall and included regular supervised sessions (e.g., once a week), phone numbers to call for assistance, and screen sharing software to resolve computer problems.
老年人计算机化认知训练干预的经验:一项混合方法研究
摘要目的计算机认知训练(CCT)越来越受欢迎,并已显示出改善认知功能的有效性。采用混合方法探讨了老年人的CCT干预经验,重点是计算机素养和参与度。方法作为正在进行的临床试验的一部分,7名老年人完成了术前CCT(预适应)和术后12周CCT(康复)干预。培训后进行了定性访谈,以探索CCT经验,并使用主题分析对数据进行了分析。使用三份问卷来描述参与者:计算机能力问卷-12、简短的计算机焦虑量表、用户参与量表。结果从访谈数据中确定了四个关键主题:“我欣赏挑战”、“在挫折中坚持会带来成就”、“当我开始时,我会完成”和“这是可以管理的,但有支持”。结论所有参与者都有积极的CCT经历,包括那些计算机知识水平较低的参与者。CCT干预措施应考虑利用定期监督会议和可实现的、具有挑战性的练习,同时专注于减少挫折感,以改善CCT体验。关键点关于这个主题已经知道的内容:计算机认知训练(CCT)已经证明有证据表明,在健康的老年人和患有轻度认知障碍的老年人中,可以改善整体和特定领域的认知功能。低依从性在CCT干预中很常见,这限制了有益的认知结果。CCT干预中的负面经历是不依从和流失的主要驱动因素。本主题补充道:CCT期间的经历经常波动,当参与者比较他们的感知能力和实际能力时,就会出现挫折感。定性访谈的建议包括使用可达到的、具有挑战性的练习,这些练习可以通过提高技能更有效地完成。总体而言,支持策略有助于获得积极的体验,包括定期监督会议(例如,每周一次)、寻求帮助的电话号码以及解决计算机问题的屏幕共享软件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Psychology
Australian Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Australian Journal of Psychology is the premier scientific journal of the Australian Psychological Society. It covers the entire spectrum of psychological research and receives articles on all topics within the broad scope of the discipline. The journal publishes high quality peer-reviewed articles with reviewers and associate editors providing detailed assistance to authors to reach publication. The journal publishes reports of experimental and survey studies, including reports of qualitative investigations, on pure and applied topics in the field of psychology. Articles on clinical psychology or on the professional concerns of applied psychology should be submitted to our sister journals, Australian Psychologist or Clinical Psychologist. The journal publishes occasional reviews of specific topics, theoretical pieces and commentaries on methodological issues. There are also solicited book reviews and comments Annual special issues devoted to a single topic, and guest edited by a specialist editor, are published. The journal regards itself as international in vision and will accept submissions from psychologists in all countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信