Experiences of Nontraditional Students and Academics of the Recognition of Prior Learning Process for Admission to Graduate Studies: A South African Case Study in Open Distance Learning

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Marici Snyman, G. van den Berg
{"title":"Experiences of Nontraditional Students and Academics of the Recognition of Prior Learning Process for Admission to Graduate Studies: A South African Case Study in Open Distance Learning","authors":"Marici Snyman, G. van den Berg","doi":"10.1080/07377363.2020.1861577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this study is to report on the recognition of prior learning (RPL) experiences of students and academics in a graduate context at an open distance learning (ODL) institution. Although students and academics are the key participants in the RPL process for access to graduate studies, their experiences regarding the process, specifically in an ODL context, appear to be under-investigated, given the limited number of studies conducted at distance learning institutions. Within an interpretative paradigm, the study followed a qualitative approach. A case study design was used to collect data employing open-ended questionnaires for students and academics involved in reviewing the RPL application students. The study involved research participants who were directly involved in the RPL process. The findings revealed that, apart from granting them admission to graduate studies, RPL candidates benefited from the process on a personal and academic level. The key aspects of RPL, such as preparation of evidence for assessment, which is similar to those of sustainable assessment, contribute to students becoming aware of their learning potential. This research contributes in a manner that provides more insight into this important academic experience of nontraditional students. This study recommends that an RPL process be an empowering and quality student experience that aims not only to prepare them for RPL assessment but also for the context after access to graduate studies.","PeriodicalId":44549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07377363.2020.1861577","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2020.1861577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this study is to report on the recognition of prior learning (RPL) experiences of students and academics in a graduate context at an open distance learning (ODL) institution. Although students and academics are the key participants in the RPL process for access to graduate studies, their experiences regarding the process, specifically in an ODL context, appear to be under-investigated, given the limited number of studies conducted at distance learning institutions. Within an interpretative paradigm, the study followed a qualitative approach. A case study design was used to collect data employing open-ended questionnaires for students and academics involved in reviewing the RPL application students. The study involved research participants who were directly involved in the RPL process. The findings revealed that, apart from granting them admission to graduate studies, RPL candidates benefited from the process on a personal and academic level. The key aspects of RPL, such as preparation of evidence for assessment, which is similar to those of sustainable assessment, contribute to students becoming aware of their learning potential. This research contributes in a manner that provides more insight into this important academic experience of nontraditional students. This study recommends that an RPL process be an empowering and quality student experience that aims not only to prepare them for RPL assessment but also for the context after access to graduate studies.
非传统学生和学者对研究生入学前学习过程认可的经验:南非开放远程教育案例研究
摘要本研究的目的是报告开放远程教育(ODL)机构的研究生背景下学生和学者对先前学习(RPL)经验的认识。虽然学生和学者是RPL过程中获得研究生学习的关键参与者,但鉴于在远程学习机构进行的研究数量有限,他们在这一过程中的经验,特别是在ODL背景下,似乎没有得到充分的调查。在解释性范式下,本研究采用定性方法。采用个案研究设计,采用开放式问卷调查的方式,对参与审查RPL申请学生的学生和学者进行数据收集。该研究涉及直接参与RPL过程的研究参与者。调查结果显示,除了获得研究生入学资格外,RPL候选人在个人和学术层面上都受益于这一过程。RPL的关键方面,例如为评估准备证据,这与可持续评估类似,有助于学生意识到他们的学习潜力。这项研究在某种程度上为非传统学生的这一重要学术经历提供了更多的见解。本研究建议,RPL过程是一种授权和高质量的学生体验,其目的不仅是为RPL评估做好准备,而且为进入研究生学习后的背景做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Continuing Higher Education
Journal of Continuing Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信