On the Imperative for Reflexivity in School Psychology Scholarship

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q1 Social Sciences
Prerna G. Arora, Amanda L. Sullivan, Sam Song
{"title":"On the Imperative for Reflexivity in School Psychology Scholarship","authors":"Prerna G. Arora, Amanda L. Sullivan, Sam Song","doi":"10.1080/2372966X.2022.2105050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Reflexivity, defined as the critical analysis of how one’s identity and values influence their scholarship, has been underscored as a crucial element of antioppressive scholarship. Despite its importance, reflexivity, and particularly its documentation, remains relatively uncommon in school psychology scholarship. In the following commentary, we introduce the need for reflexivity as it relates to the field’s commitment to antiracism, followed by a brief review of the literature on reflexivity, including its historical foundations and its previous applications within the fields of psychological research. We conclude with recommendations for the school psychology scholarly community for conceptualizing, conducting, and disseminating scholarship. Impact Statement Despite its importance, reflexivity, or the critical analysis of how one’s identity and values influence their scholarship, in school psychology scholarship remains uncommon. In this commentary, we introduce the need for reflexivity within school psychology scholarship and provide recommendations for the school psychology scholarly community. This manuscript serves as a call to increase implementation of a reflexive approach in school psychology scholarship.","PeriodicalId":21555,"journal":{"name":"School Psychology Review","volume":"52 1","pages":"665 - 677"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2022.2105050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Reflexivity, defined as the critical analysis of how one’s identity and values influence their scholarship, has been underscored as a crucial element of antioppressive scholarship. Despite its importance, reflexivity, and particularly its documentation, remains relatively uncommon in school psychology scholarship. In the following commentary, we introduce the need for reflexivity as it relates to the field’s commitment to antiracism, followed by a brief review of the literature on reflexivity, including its historical foundations and its previous applications within the fields of psychological research. We conclude with recommendations for the school psychology scholarly community for conceptualizing, conducting, and disseminating scholarship. Impact Statement Despite its importance, reflexivity, or the critical analysis of how one’s identity and values influence their scholarship, in school psychology scholarship remains uncommon. In this commentary, we introduce the need for reflexivity within school psychology scholarship and provide recommendations for the school psychology scholarly community. This manuscript serves as a call to increase implementation of a reflexive approach in school psychology scholarship.
论学校心理学学术反思的必要性
反身性,定义为对一个人的身份和价值观如何影响其学术研究的批判性分析,被强调为反压迫学术研究的关键要素。尽管它很重要,但反身性,尤其是它的文献,在学校心理学研究中仍然相对少见。在下面的评论中,我们将介绍反身性的必要性,因为它与该领域对反种族主义的承诺有关,然后简要回顾有关反身性的文献,包括其历史基础及其在心理学研究领域中的先前应用。最后,我们对学校心理学学术界提出了概念化、指导和传播学术的建议。尽管它很重要,反身性,或者对一个人的身份和价值观如何影响他们的学术的批判性分析,在学校心理学学术仍然不常见。在这篇评论中,我们介绍了学校心理学学术对反身性的需求,并为学校心理学学术界提供了建议。这份手稿作为一个呼吁,以增加在学校心理学奖学金的反身性方法的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
School Psychology Review
School Psychology Review Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: School Psychology Review (SPR) is a refereed journal published quarterly by NASP. Its primary purpose is to provide a means for communicating scholarly advances in research, training, and practice related to psychology and education, and specifically to school psychology. Of particular interest are articles presenting original, data-based research that can contribute to the development of innovative intervention and prevention strategies and the evaluation of these approaches. SPR presents important conceptual developments and empirical findings from a wide range of disciplines (e.g., educational, child clinical, pediatric, community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信