Preferences of COVID-19 Vaccines in the General Population in Belgrade, Serbia: A Qualitative Study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-07 DOI:10.1080/08964289.2022.2085652
Tatjana Gazibara, Smiljana Cvjetkovic, Marija Milic, Jelena Dotlic, Natasa Maksimovic, Verica Jovanovic, Vida Jeremic Stojkovic
{"title":"Preferences of COVID-19 Vaccines in the General Population in Belgrade, Serbia: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Tatjana Gazibara, Smiljana Cvjetkovic, Marija Milic, Jelena Dotlic, Natasa Maksimovic, Verica Jovanovic, Vida Jeremic Stojkovic","doi":"10.1080/08964289.2022.2085652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Few countries provided multiple COVID-19 vaccines for their citizens right from the start of mass immunization. In Serbia, four vaccines were available. Circumstances in which people had several options to choose from are unique. The purpose of this study was to identify motivators behind COVID-19 vaccination and the choice of COVID-19 vaccine among people who were immunized against COVID-19. Qualitative interviews with 35 vaccinated people aged > 18 years were conducted in May 2021 at the Institute of Public Health of Serbia, a reference institution for vaccination. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Four topics emerged: 1) Decision to receive COVID-19 vaccine; 2) Sources of information about the vaccine; 3) Choice of the COVID-19 vaccine and 4) Anti-vaccination sentiment around the vaccinated people. Participants were classified in two groups: those who were determined to receive the vaccine and those who were hesitant. People who were hesitant decided to receive the vaccine after reviewing the information collected from various sources, especially physicians. Although some participants accepted any vaccine regardless of their characteristics, there were others who had explicit preferences. These preferences stemmed mainly from their beliefs about particular vaccine's efficacy and safety, COVID-19 status (previous infection), living or lifestyle circumstances (residence or travel abroad), doctor's recommendation (underlying health status) or trust in expertise of that particular manufacturer's country of origin. Opting for appropriate vaccine was motivated by reasons specific to various individuals, which enabled them to make choices in line with their preferences and values.</p>","PeriodicalId":55395,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2022.2085652","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Few countries provided multiple COVID-19 vaccines for their citizens right from the start of mass immunization. In Serbia, four vaccines were available. Circumstances in which people had several options to choose from are unique. The purpose of this study was to identify motivators behind COVID-19 vaccination and the choice of COVID-19 vaccine among people who were immunized against COVID-19. Qualitative interviews with 35 vaccinated people aged > 18 years were conducted in May 2021 at the Institute of Public Health of Serbia, a reference institution for vaccination. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Four topics emerged: 1) Decision to receive COVID-19 vaccine; 2) Sources of information about the vaccine; 3) Choice of the COVID-19 vaccine and 4) Anti-vaccination sentiment around the vaccinated people. Participants were classified in two groups: those who were determined to receive the vaccine and those who were hesitant. People who were hesitant decided to receive the vaccine after reviewing the information collected from various sources, especially physicians. Although some participants accepted any vaccine regardless of their characteristics, there were others who had explicit preferences. These preferences stemmed mainly from their beliefs about particular vaccine's efficacy and safety, COVID-19 status (previous infection), living or lifestyle circumstances (residence or travel abroad), doctor's recommendation (underlying health status) or trust in expertise of that particular manufacturer's country of origin. Opting for appropriate vaccine was motivated by reasons specific to various individuals, which enabled them to make choices in line with their preferences and values.

塞尔维亚贝尔格莱德普通人群对新冠肺炎疫苗的偏好:定性研究。
很少有国家从大规模免疫开始就为其公民提供多种COVID-19疫苗。在塞尔维亚,有四种疫苗可用。人们有多种选择的环境是独一无二的。本研究的目的是确定COVID-19疫苗接种背后的动机,以及接种COVID-19疫苗的人选择COVID-19疫苗的动机。2021年5月,在疫苗接种参考机构塞尔维亚公共卫生研究所,对35名年龄在1至18岁之间接种疫苗的人进行了定性访谈。访谈录音,转录和数据分析采用定性内容分析。出现了四个主题:1)决定接种COVID-19疫苗;2)疫苗的信息来源;3)新型冠状病毒疫苗的选择;4)接种人群周围的反接种情绪。参与者被分为两组:一组决定接种疫苗,另一组犹豫不决。犹豫不决的人在审查了从各种来源(尤其是医生)收集的信息后,决定接种疫苗。尽管一些参与者接受任何疫苗,不管他们的特点如何,但也有一些人有明确的偏好。这些偏好主要源于他们对特定疫苗的有效性和安全性、COVID-19状态(先前感染)、生活或生活方式情况(居住或出国旅行)、医生建议(潜在健康状况)或对特定制造商原产国专业知识的信任。选择适当的疫苗是出于不同个人的具体原因,这使他们能够根据自己的喜好和价值观做出选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral Medicine
Behavioral Medicine 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal, which fosters and promotes the exchange of knowledge and the advancement of theory in the field of behavioral medicine, including but not limited to understandings of disease prevention, health promotion, health disparities, identification of health risk factors, and interventions designed to reduce health risks, ameliorate health disparities, enhancing all aspects of health. The journal seeks to advance knowledge and theory in these domains in all segments of the population and across the lifespan, in local, national, and global contexts, and with an emphasis on the synergies that exist between biological, psychological, psychosocial, and structural factors as they related to these areas of study and across health states. Behavioral Medicine publishes original empirical studies (experimental and observational research studies, quantitative and qualitative studies, evaluation studies) as well as clinical/case studies. The journal also publishes review articles, which provide systematic evaluations of the literature and propose alternative and innovative theoretical paradigms, as well as brief reports and responses to articles previously published in Behavioral Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信