Is it me or us? The impact of individual and collective participation on work engagement and burnout in a cluster-randomized organisational intervention

IF 5.6 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED

Work and Stress Pub Date : 2021-02-17 DOI:10.1080/02678373.2021.1889072

K. Nielsen, Mirko Antino, A. Rodríguez-Muñoz, A. Sanz‐Vergel

{"title":"Is it me or us? The impact of individual and collective participation on work engagement and burnout in a cluster-randomized organisational intervention","authors":"K. Nielsen, Mirko Antino, A. Rodríguez-Muñoz, A. Sanz‐Vergel","doi":"10.1080/02678373.2021.1889072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Participation is generally recommended when implementing organisational interventions, however, understanding how participation works remains understudied. In a cluster-randomised, controlled intervention employing a wait-list control design, we explore whether perceptions of individual or collective participation had the greatest impact on a participatory organisational intervention’s outcomes; work engagement and burnout. We conducted the study in the Danish postal service (N = 330). Using multi-level analyses, we found that perceptions of individual participation predicted improvements in work engagement and reductions in burnout post-intervention, however, these relationships became non-significant after including perceptions of being part of a collective participatory process in the model. Our findings add to the understanding of the role participation and in particular, perceptions of a collective participatory intervention process, plays in ensuring interventions achieve their intended outcomes.","PeriodicalId":48199,"journal":{"name":"Work and Stress","volume":"35 1","pages":"374 - 397"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02678373.2021.1889072","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work and Stress","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2021.1889072","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

Abstract

ABSTRACT Participation is generally recommended when implementing organisational interventions, however, understanding how participation works remains understudied. In a cluster-randomised, controlled intervention employing a wait-list control design, we explore whether perceptions of individual or collective participation had the greatest impact on a participatory organisational intervention’s outcomes; work engagement and burnout. We conducted the study in the Danish postal service (N = 330). Using multi-level analyses, we found that perceptions of individual participation predicted improvements in work engagement and reductions in burnout post-intervention, however, these relationships became non-significant after including perceptions of being part of a collective participatory process in the model. Our findings add to the understanding of the role participation and in particular, perceptions of a collective participatory intervention process, plays in ensuring interventions achieve their intended outcomes.

查看原文本刊更多论文

是我还是我们？集群随机组织干预中个体和集体参与对工作投入和倦怠的影响

摘要：在实施组织干预措施时，通常建议参与，但对参与如何运作的理解仍有待深入研究。在一项采用等待名单对照设计的集群随机对照干预中，我们探讨了个人或集体参与的认知是否对参与性组织干预的结果影响最大；工作投入和倦怠。我们在丹麦邮政部门（N = 330）。使用多层次分析，我们发现，对个人参与的感知可以预测干预后工作参与度的提高和倦怠感的减少，然而，在将参与集体参与过程的感知纳入模型后，这些关系变得不显著。我们的研究结果有助于理解参与，特别是对集体参与干预过程的看法，在确保干预达到预期结果方面发挥的作用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Work and Stress PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

CiteScore

11.70

自引率

3.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Work & Stress is an international, multidisciplinary quarterly presenting high-quality papers concerned with the psychological, social and organizational aspects of occupational health and well-being, and stress and safety management. It is published in association with the European Academy of Occupational Health Psychology. The journal publishes empirical reports, scholarly reviews and theoretical papers. It is directed at occupational health psychologists, work and organizational psychologists, those involved with organizational development, and all concerned with the interplay of work, health and organisations. Research published in Work & Stress relates psychologically salient features of the work environment to their psychological, behavioural and health consequences, focusing on the underlying psychological processes. The journal has become a natural home for research on the work-family interface, social relations at work (including topics such as bullying and conflict at work, leadership and organizational support), workplace interventions and reorganizations, and dimensions and outcomes of worker stress and well-being. Such dimensions and outcomes, both positive and negative, include stress, burnout, sickness absence, work motivation, work engagement and work performance. Of course, submissions addressing other topics in occupational health psychology are also welcomed.