Evidence-based Features of Writing Instruction in Widely Used Kindergarten English Language Arts Curricula

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Clariebelle Gabas, Sonia Q. Cabell, Stefanie B. Copp, M. Campbell
{"title":"Evidence-based Features of Writing Instruction in Widely Used Kindergarten English Language Arts Curricula","authors":"Clariebelle Gabas, Sonia Q. Cabell, Stefanie B. Copp, M. Campbell","doi":"10.1080/19388071.2022.2059420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study described the features of writing instruction in widely used kindergarten English Language Arts programs and examined their alignment with evidence-based, best-practice guidelines. Three popular curricula were selected for analyses: Reading Wonders, Journeys, and Reading Street. Our coding of teacher manuals focused on instructional provisions for composing, spelling, and handwriting in key instructional sections within each curriculum: (1) genre writing, (2) grammar, and (3) reading instruction. Lessons for coding were sampled from the beginning, middle, and end of each program, comprising 12 weeks of instruction. Results indicated that, although variable across curricula, there were several features of writing instruction that aligned with evidence-based guidelines. All curricula included daily writing lessons and activities, along with provisions for teaching the writing process and basic writing skills (i.e., sentence construction, spelling, handwriting). However, instruction in basic writing skills were often isolated and support for these skills was rarely embedded within the context of children’s own written compositions. In addition, children had relatively less opportunities to independently write their own compositions in genre writing compared to teacher modeling writing or using shared writing. Results of this study could inform efforts to revise or develop curricula to better facilitate the writing development of kindergartners.","PeriodicalId":45434,"journal":{"name":"Literacy Research and Instruction","volume":"62 1","pages":"74 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literacy Research and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2022.2059420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study described the features of writing instruction in widely used kindergarten English Language Arts programs and examined their alignment with evidence-based, best-practice guidelines. Three popular curricula were selected for analyses: Reading Wonders, Journeys, and Reading Street. Our coding of teacher manuals focused on instructional provisions for composing, spelling, and handwriting in key instructional sections within each curriculum: (1) genre writing, (2) grammar, and (3) reading instruction. Lessons for coding were sampled from the beginning, middle, and end of each program, comprising 12 weeks of instruction. Results indicated that, although variable across curricula, there were several features of writing instruction that aligned with evidence-based guidelines. All curricula included daily writing lessons and activities, along with provisions for teaching the writing process and basic writing skills (i.e., sentence construction, spelling, handwriting). However, instruction in basic writing skills were often isolated and support for these skills was rarely embedded within the context of children’s own written compositions. In addition, children had relatively less opportunities to independently write their own compositions in genre writing compared to teacher modeling writing or using shared writing. Results of this study could inform efforts to revise or develop curricula to better facilitate the writing development of kindergartners.
应用广泛的幼儿园英语语言艺术课程中写作教学的循证特征
摘要本研究描述了广泛使用的幼儿园英语语言艺术课程中的写作教学特点,并检验了它们与循证最佳实践指南的一致性。选择了三个受欢迎的课程进行分析:阅读奇观、旅程和阅读街。我们对教师手册的编码侧重于每门课程中关键教学部分的写作、拼写和手写教学规定:(1)体裁写作,(2)语法,和(3)阅读教学。编码课程从每个课程的开始、中期和结束都进行了抽样,包括12周的教学。结果表明,尽管各课程各不相同,但写作教学有几个特点符合循证指南。所有课程都包括日常写作课程和活动,以及教学写作过程和基本写作技能(即造句、拼写、手写)的规定。然而,对基本写作技能的指导往往是孤立的,对这些技能的支持很少嵌入到孩子自己的书面作文中。此外,与教师建模写作或使用共享写作相比,孩子们在体裁写作中独立写作的机会相对较少。这项研究的结果可以为修改或开发课程提供信息,以更好地促进幼儿园儿童的写作发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Literacy Research and Instruction
Literacy Research and Instruction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Literacy Research and Instruction (formerly Reading Research and Instruction), the official journal of the College Reading Association, is an international refereed professional journal that publishes articles dealing with research and instruction in reading education and allied literacy fields. The journal is especially focused on instructional practices and applied or basic research of special interest to reading and literacy educators. Peer Review Policy: All articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by reviewers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信