The Role of Spatial Ability and Attention Shifting in Reading of Illustrated Scientific Texts: An Eye Tracking Study

IF 1.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Sungyoon Lee
{"title":"The Role of Spatial Ability and Attention Shifting in Reading of Illustrated Scientific Texts: An Eye Tracking Study","authors":"Sungyoon Lee","doi":"10.1080/02702711.2023.2202186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of the study is to examine the role of spatial ability and attention shifting in reading of illustrated science texts. Thirty-five fourth/fifth elementary students read two science texts. Prior knowledge and retention/transfer learning outcomes were measured using researcher-developed measures. While reading, students’ eye movements were monitored with an eye-tracker. Several eye movement indices were used to reflect reading processes. Fixation count on text/picture was used to represent students’ attentional focus on text or picture. Text to text saccades and picture to picture saccades were used to reflect students’ information organization. Students’ integrative reading behavior was measured by eye movement transitions between text and picture. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and Visual Perception Skill Test were used to assess attention shifting and visuospatial working memory, respectively. Multiple regressions were conducted to examine whether students’ spatial ability and attention shifting predict text processing, picture processing, or integrative processing of text and picture. Hierarchical regressions were conducted to examine whether students’ integrative reading make unique and direct contributions to their learning outcomes. The study found that 1) both spatial ability and attention shifting are significant predictors for integrative reading behavior while they are not for other processing behaviors (i.e., text processing and picture processing) and 2) integrative reading behaviors in illustrated text reading account for significant amounts of variance in the transfer outcomes while not in the retention outcomes. This study gives practical implications on the development of visual literacy interventions and on how teachers design their instruction about science text reading.","PeriodicalId":46567,"journal":{"name":"Reading Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2023.2202186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of the study is to examine the role of spatial ability and attention shifting in reading of illustrated science texts. Thirty-five fourth/fifth elementary students read two science texts. Prior knowledge and retention/transfer learning outcomes were measured using researcher-developed measures. While reading, students’ eye movements were monitored with an eye-tracker. Several eye movement indices were used to reflect reading processes. Fixation count on text/picture was used to represent students’ attentional focus on text or picture. Text to text saccades and picture to picture saccades were used to reflect students’ information organization. Students’ integrative reading behavior was measured by eye movement transitions between text and picture. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and Visual Perception Skill Test were used to assess attention shifting and visuospatial working memory, respectively. Multiple regressions were conducted to examine whether students’ spatial ability and attention shifting predict text processing, picture processing, or integrative processing of text and picture. Hierarchical regressions were conducted to examine whether students’ integrative reading make unique and direct contributions to their learning outcomes. The study found that 1) both spatial ability and attention shifting are significant predictors for integrative reading behavior while they are not for other processing behaviors (i.e., text processing and picture processing) and 2) integrative reading behaviors in illustrated text reading account for significant amounts of variance in the transfer outcomes while not in the retention outcomes. This study gives practical implications on the development of visual literacy interventions and on how teachers design their instruction about science text reading.
空间能力和注意力转移在科学插图阅读中的作用:眼动追踪研究
摘要本研究旨在探讨空间能力和注意力转移在阅读插图科学文本中的作用。35名小学四年级/五年级学生阅读两篇科学课文。先验知识和保留/迁移学习结果使用研究人员开发的测量方法进行测量。在阅读时,用眼动仪监测学生的眼球运动。几个眼动指标被用来反映阅读过程。对文字/图片的注视计数用来表征学生对文字或图片的注意焦点。采用文字对文字的扫视和图片对图片的扫视来反映学生的信息组织。通过眼动在文字和图片之间的转换来衡量学生的综合阅读行为。威斯康星卡片分类测验和视觉感知技能测验分别评估注意转移和视觉空间工作记忆。多元回归检验了学生的空间能力和注意转移是否预测了文本加工、图像加工或图文综合加工。采用层次回归来检验学生的综合阅读是否对他们的学习成果有独特和直接的贡献。研究发现:(1)空间能力和注意力转移是综合阅读行为的显著预测因子,而对其他加工行为(如文字加工和图片加工)没有显著影响;(2)图文阅读中的综合阅读行为对迁移结果有显著影响,而对保留结果没有显著影响。本研究对视觉素养干预的发展和教师如何设计科学文本阅读教学具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reading Psychology
Reading Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Prepared exclusively by professionals, this refereed journal publishes original manuscripts in the fields of literacy, reading, and related psychology disciplines. Articles appear in the form of completed research; practitioner-based "experiential" methods or philosophical statements; teacher and counselor preparation services for guiding all levels of reading skill development, attitudes, and interests; programs or materials; and literary or humorous contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信