Debates on Religious Studies In the Phenomenology Perspective and Its Contribution to Interfaith Tolerance

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Ulumuna Pub Date : 2019-06-28 DOI:10.20414/ujis.v23i1.347
Akhiyat Akhiyat
{"title":"Debates on Religious Studies In the Phenomenology Perspective and Its Contribution to Interfaith Tolerance","authors":"Akhiyat Akhiyat","doi":"10.20414/ujis.v23i1.347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The phenomenological approach in religious studies has played an essential role in uncovering the mysteries of religious experience. With the epoché concept, which refers to the meaning of \"delaying all judgments\", or it can be said as meaning with the intention of suspending an understanding, that is interpreted as \"confinement\" (bracketing), the researcher must temporarily let go of all his judgments or understanding of the phenomenon under study to obtain universal knowledge that is transcendental to the phenomenon of religion and experience the essence that they obtain. However, critics from experts for this phenomenological approach to religion still exist, in this case, summarized in three points: first, about the continuity of the phenomenology of religion as a philosophical tradition. Second, hidden theological assumptions or motives behind the phenomenological approach of religion. Third, what is the involvement of religious scientists in the public role as social scientists face current social and political realities or the challenges of religious scientists whether they accept the public role or do not face the reality of various problems faced by society.","PeriodicalId":55654,"journal":{"name":"Ulumuna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulumuna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v23i1.347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The phenomenological approach in religious studies has played an essential role in uncovering the mysteries of religious experience. With the epoché concept, which refers to the meaning of "delaying all judgments", or it can be said as meaning with the intention of suspending an understanding, that is interpreted as "confinement" (bracketing), the researcher must temporarily let go of all his judgments or understanding of the phenomenon under study to obtain universal knowledge that is transcendental to the phenomenon of religion and experience the essence that they obtain. However, critics from experts for this phenomenological approach to religion still exist, in this case, summarized in three points: first, about the continuity of the phenomenology of religion as a philosophical tradition. Second, hidden theological assumptions or motives behind the phenomenological approach of religion. Third, what is the involvement of religious scientists in the public role as social scientists face current social and political realities or the challenges of religious scientists whether they accept the public role or do not face the reality of various problems faced by society.
现象学视角下的宗教研究论争及其对宗教间宽容的贡献
现象学方法在揭示宗教经验的奥秘方面发挥了重要作用。epoch - ch概念,指的是“延迟一切判断”的意义,或者可以说是意图暂停一种理解的意义,即“禁闭”(bracketing),研究者必须暂时放下对所研究现象的一切判断或理解,才能获得对宗教现象超越性的普遍知识,并体验所获得的本质。然而,专家对这种现象学的宗教研究方法的批评仍然存在,在这种情况下,总结为三点:第一,关于宗教现象学作为一种哲学传统的连续性。其次,宗教现象学方法背后隐藏的神学假设或动机。第三,当社会科学家面对当前的社会和政治现实时,宗教科学家在公共角色中的参与是什么,或者宗教科学家是否接受公共角色或不面对社会面临的各种问题的现实所面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信