Development and Preliminary Validity Evidence for the Direct Behavior Rating-Classroom Management (DBR-CM)

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Wesley A. Sims, Kathleen R King, W. Reinke, K. Herman, T. C. Riley-Tillman
{"title":"Development and Preliminary Validity Evidence for the Direct Behavior Rating-Classroom Management (DBR-CM)","authors":"Wesley A. Sims, Kathleen R King, W. Reinke, K. Herman, T. C. Riley-Tillman","doi":"10.1080/10474412.2020.1732990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Effective classroom management is of critical importance to the success of universal, Tier I supports and services. Unfortunately, teacher-reported deficits in classroom management training are well documented. In response, use of professional development activities such as consultation, coaching, and on-going performance feedback emphasizing skill-building have proliferated. The Direct Behavior Rating-Classroom Management (DBR-CM) was developed to facilitate screening and formative data collection to drive these activities. This study presents the background, development, and preliminary psychometric evidence for the DBR-CM. Specifically, this study examined inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity in support of the DBR-CM. Findings are promising with inter-rater reliability approaching or exceeding acceptable agreement levels and significant correlations noted between DBR-CM scores and concurrently completed measures of teacher classroom management behavior and perceived self-efficacy. Implications for use and future research are discussed, including further validation and refinement of the DBR-CM and its use within indirect, consultative service delivery.","PeriodicalId":46759,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation","volume":"31 1","pages":"215 - 245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10474412.2020.1732990","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2020.1732990","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Effective classroom management is of critical importance to the success of universal, Tier I supports and services. Unfortunately, teacher-reported deficits in classroom management training are well documented. In response, use of professional development activities such as consultation, coaching, and on-going performance feedback emphasizing skill-building have proliferated. The Direct Behavior Rating-Classroom Management (DBR-CM) was developed to facilitate screening and formative data collection to drive these activities. This study presents the background, development, and preliminary psychometric evidence for the DBR-CM. Specifically, this study examined inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity in support of the DBR-CM. Findings are promising with inter-rater reliability approaching or exceeding acceptable agreement levels and significant correlations noted between DBR-CM scores and concurrently completed measures of teacher classroom management behavior and perceived self-efficacy. Implications for use and future research are discussed, including further validation and refinement of the DBR-CM and its use within indirect, consultative service delivery.
直接行为评定-课堂管理(DBR-CM)的开发与初步效度证据
有效的课堂管理对于普及一级支持和服务的成功至关重要。不幸的是,教师报告的课堂管理培训的缺陷是有据可查的。作为回应,专业发展活动的使用,如咨询、指导和持续的绩效反馈,强调技能建设,已经激增。直接行为评级-课堂管理(DBR-CM)的开发是为了促进筛选和形成性数据收集,以推动这些活动。本研究介绍了DBR-CM的背景、发展和初步的心理测量证据。具体来说,本研究检验了评估者间信度和并发效度来支持DBR-CM。研究结果令人鼓舞,评分者之间的信度接近或超过可接受的一致水平,DBR-CM分数与同时完成的教师课堂管理行为和感知自我效能之间存在显著相关性。讨论了使用和未来研究的意义,包括进一步验证和改进DBR-CM及其在间接咨询服务提供中的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
23.50%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation (JEPC) provides a forum for improving the scientific understanding of consultation and for describing practical strategies to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of consultation services. Consultation is broadly defined as a process that facilitates problem solving for individuals, groups, and organizations. JEPC publishes articles and special thematic issues that describe formal research, evaluate practice, examine the program implementation process, review relevant literature, investigate systems change, discuss salient issues, and carefully document the translation of theory into practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信