Compliance with COVID-19 prevention measures during the onset of the pandemic in Australia: investigating the role of trust in federal and state governments and scientists.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Australian Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2023-06-26 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/00049530.2023.2224453
Brad Elphinstone, Melissa A Wheeler, Julian Oldmeadow, Diane Sivasubramaniam, James Williams, Samuel G Wilson, Christine Critchley
{"title":"Compliance with COVID-19 prevention measures during the onset of the pandemic in Australia: investigating the role of trust in federal and state governments and scientists.","authors":"Brad Elphinstone, Melissa A Wheeler, Julian Oldmeadow, Diane Sivasubramaniam, James Williams, Samuel G Wilson, Christine Critchley","doi":"10.1080/00049530.2023.2224453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current study explored (1) changes in trust in federal and state governments and scientists across representative Australian national samples from 2003-2020; and (2) the extent to which trust in these sources predicted compliance with COVID-19 prevention measures at the onset of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using a nationally representative samples (N = 1000), we asked participants to rate their trust in federal and state government and in scientists, their extent of compliance with COVID-19 prevention measures, and to provide demographic information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that trust in federal and state governments had significantly increased, while trust in scientists was at a high level matched by only three other time-points. Higher levels of trust in state government and scientists uniquely predicted greater compliance with COVID-19 prevention measures. Women and older respondents also reported greater compliance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current findings reinforce those from Australia and other countries indicating that trust increased during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, and those identifying trust in government and in scientists as important predictors of compliance. Importantly, our findings highlight the role of trust in state government, which potentially reflects the role played by Australian state governments in enacting and enforcing COVID-19 prevention measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":8871,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"2224453"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12175679/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2023.2224453","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The current study explored (1) changes in trust in federal and state governments and scientists across representative Australian national samples from 2003-2020; and (2) the extent to which trust in these sources predicted compliance with COVID-19 prevention measures at the onset of the pandemic.

Method: Using a nationally representative samples (N = 1000), we asked participants to rate their trust in federal and state government and in scientists, their extent of compliance with COVID-19 prevention measures, and to provide demographic information.

Results: We found that trust in federal and state governments had significantly increased, while trust in scientists was at a high level matched by only three other time-points. Higher levels of trust in state government and scientists uniquely predicted greater compliance with COVID-19 prevention measures. Women and older respondents also reported greater compliance.

Conclusion: The current findings reinforce those from Australia and other countries indicating that trust increased during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, and those identifying trust in government and in scientists as important predictors of compliance. Importantly, our findings highlight the role of trust in state government, which potentially reflects the role played by Australian state governments in enacting and enforcing COVID-19 prevention measures.

Abstract Image

澳大利亚疫情爆发期间对新冠肺炎预防措施的遵守情况:调查信任对联邦和州政府和科学家的作用
目的:本研究探讨了(1)2003-2020年澳大利亚代表性国家样本中对联邦和州政府以及科学家的信任变化;(2)对这些来源的信任在多大程度上预测了在大流行开始时遵守COVID-19预防措施的情况。方法:使用具有全国代表性的样本(N = 1000),我们要求参与者评估他们对联邦和州政府以及科学家的信任程度,他们遵守COVID-19预防措施的程度,并提供人口统计信息。结果:我们发现,对联邦政府和州政府的信任显著增加,而对科学家的信任处于较高水平,只有其他三个时间点与之相匹配。对州政府和科学家的更高信任度独特地预测了更大程度上遵守COVID-19预防措施。女性和年龄较大的受访者也表示更遵守规定。结论:目前的研究结果强化了澳大利亚和其他国家的研究结果,即在COVID-19大流行爆发期间,信任有所增加,对政府和科学家的信任是合规的重要预测因素。重要的是,我们的研究结果强调了信任对州政府的作用,这可能反映了澳大利亚州政府在制定和执行COVID-19预防措施方面发挥的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Psychology
Australian Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Australian Journal of Psychology is the premier scientific journal of the Australian Psychological Society. It covers the entire spectrum of psychological research and receives articles on all topics within the broad scope of the discipline. The journal publishes high quality peer-reviewed articles with reviewers and associate editors providing detailed assistance to authors to reach publication. The journal publishes reports of experimental and survey studies, including reports of qualitative investigations, on pure and applied topics in the field of psychology. Articles on clinical psychology or on the professional concerns of applied psychology should be submitted to our sister journals, Australian Psychologist or Clinical Psychologist. The journal publishes occasional reviews of specific topics, theoretical pieces and commentaries on methodological issues. There are also solicited book reviews and comments Annual special issues devoted to a single topic, and guest edited by a specialist editor, are published. The journal regards itself as international in vision and will accept submissions from psychologists in all countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信