‘Are we doing Cátedra de Paz?’ Teacher perspectives on enacting peace education in Bogotá, Colombia

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
M. Bellino, Marcela Ortiz-Guerrero, J. Paulson, Angie Paola Ariza Porras, Ibeth Danelly Cortes, Sebastian Ritschard, Ariel Sánchez Meertens
{"title":"‘Are we doing Cátedra de Paz?’ Teacher perspectives on enacting peace education in Bogotá, Colombia","authors":"M. Bellino, Marcela Ortiz-Guerrero, J. Paulson, Angie Paola Ariza Porras, Ibeth Danelly Cortes, Sebastian Ritschard, Ariel Sánchez Meertens","doi":"10.1080/17400201.2022.2146076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In 2015, the Colombian Ministry of Education introduced the Cátedra de Paz (CdP), a national policy that seeks to contribute to human rights, citizenship, violence prevention, and peaceful conflict resolution. In the context of a decentralized education system, schools have significant autonomy to adapt the policy to local contexts. Relatively little research to date has documented the enactment, evaluation, or impact of the CdP. This study aims to understand how educators have interpreted this national mandate, and the extent to which the policy has prompted and expanded teaching and learning opportunities about conflict, peace, and justice. We explore the perspectives of 46 teachers working in public schools across 19 of Bogotá’s 20 localities, several years into the creation of the CdP and in the midst of a contentious national peace process. The paper shows a range of enactment formats and uneven impact on teachers’ existing commitments to peace education. We conclude that the CdP has had a contradictory effect on school-based practices, legitimizing the importance of peace education as a national imperative, while marginalizing efforts within schools as individualized and bound to the social sciences subject.","PeriodicalId":44502,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Peace Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Peace Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2022.2146076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT In 2015, the Colombian Ministry of Education introduced the Cátedra de Paz (CdP), a national policy that seeks to contribute to human rights, citizenship, violence prevention, and peaceful conflict resolution. In the context of a decentralized education system, schools have significant autonomy to adapt the policy to local contexts. Relatively little research to date has documented the enactment, evaluation, or impact of the CdP. This study aims to understand how educators have interpreted this national mandate, and the extent to which the policy has prompted and expanded teaching and learning opportunities about conflict, peace, and justice. We explore the perspectives of 46 teachers working in public schools across 19 of Bogotá’s 20 localities, several years into the creation of the CdP and in the midst of a contentious national peace process. The paper shows a range of enactment formats and uneven impact on teachers’ existing commitments to peace education. We conclude that the CdP has had a contradictory effect on school-based practices, legitimizing the importance of peace education as a national imperative, while marginalizing efforts within schools as individualized and bound to the social sciences subject.
“我们要做Cátedra de Paz吗?”教师对哥伦比亚波哥大实施和平教育的看法
2015年,哥伦比亚教育部推出了Cátedra de Paz (CdP)国家政策,旨在促进人权、公民身份、暴力预防和和平解决冲突。在一个分散的教育系统的背景下,学校有很大的自主权,使政策适应当地情况。迄今为止,很少有研究记录了CdP的制定、评估或影响。本研究旨在了解教育工作者如何解释这一国家授权,以及该政策在多大程度上促进和扩大了有关冲突、和平与正义的教学机会。我们探讨了波哥大 20个地区中19个地区公立学校的46名教师的观点,这些教师在创建共产党的几年里,在一个有争议的国家和平进程中工作。本文展示了一系列的立法形式和对教师现有和平教育承诺的不平衡影响。我们的结论是,CdP对学校实践产生了矛盾的影响,使和平教育作为国家当务之急的重要性合法化,同时将学校内的努力边缘化,认为这是个体化的,与社会科学学科有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Peace Education
Journal of Peace Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信