Learning from expert or own practice: reflectively editing video cases for professional development

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Raziye Sancar, Deniz Atal
{"title":"Learning from expert or own practice: reflectively editing video cases for professional development","authors":"Raziye Sancar, Deniz Atal","doi":"10.1080/14623943.2022.2146083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This research aimed to investigate how the video editing process professionally affected preservice teachers’ reflection levels and whether it differed by the type of in-class teaching experiences (their own and expert teacher experiences). The editing procedure of video cases means selecting and combining parts from an entire recorded in-class teaching experience and adding reflective thinking on actions. Seven participants took part in the research process during a semester, with three-cycle of the video case editing procedures being applied separately to two different research groups. Both inductive and deductive content analysis procedures were applied in a total of 21 video cases edited by PTs. By editing in-class teaching experiences, PTs could deeply analyse the events and transform their reflections on the contextual features. The process facilitated PTs’ professional development by identifying, noticing, and reflecting on in-class teaching experiences. PTs learned to analyse their experiences by using different types of perspectives. PTs could deeply analyse the events and transform their reflections on the contextual features. Contrary to the difficulties for PTs’ reflection-in-action, the process of editing in-class teaching experiences expanded their reflection-on-action opportunities.","PeriodicalId":51594,"journal":{"name":"Reflective Practice","volume":"24 1","pages":"168 - 182"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reflective Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2022.2146083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This research aimed to investigate how the video editing process professionally affected preservice teachers’ reflection levels and whether it differed by the type of in-class teaching experiences (their own and expert teacher experiences). The editing procedure of video cases means selecting and combining parts from an entire recorded in-class teaching experience and adding reflective thinking on actions. Seven participants took part in the research process during a semester, with three-cycle of the video case editing procedures being applied separately to two different research groups. Both inductive and deductive content analysis procedures were applied in a total of 21 video cases edited by PTs. By editing in-class teaching experiences, PTs could deeply analyse the events and transform their reflections on the contextual features. The process facilitated PTs’ professional development by identifying, noticing, and reflecting on in-class teaching experiences. PTs learned to analyse their experiences by using different types of perspectives. PTs could deeply analyse the events and transform their reflections on the contextual features. Contrary to the difficulties for PTs’ reflection-in-action, the process of editing in-class teaching experiences expanded their reflection-on-action opportunities.
向专家或自己的实践学习:反思编辑视频案例,促进专业发展
摘要本研究旨在探讨视频编辑过程对职前教师反思水平的专业影响,以及这种影响是否因课堂教学经验(教师自身和专家教师经验)的类型而异。视频案例的编辑过程就是从整个课堂教学经历中选取和组合部分,并加入对动作的反思。七名参与者在一个学期内参与了研究过程,三个周期的视频案例编辑程序分别应用于两个不同的研究小组。对PTs编辑的21个视频案例采用归纳和演绎两种内容分析方法。通过对课堂教学经验的编辑,教师可以对事件进行深入分析,转化对情境特征的思考。这个过程通过识别、注意和反思课堂教学经验,促进了PTs的专业发展。学生们学会了用不同的视角来分析他们的经历。PTs可以对事件进行深入分析,转化对语境特征的思考。与教师行动反思的困难相反,课堂教学经验的编辑过程扩大了教师行动反思的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reflective Practice
Reflective Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信