Encouraging inquiry in the digital age

IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
B. Kraft
{"title":"Encouraging inquiry in the digital age","authors":"B. Kraft","doi":"10.1080/00933104.2021.1890970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is no question that amidst an educational landscape with increasing emphasis on critical thinking and student-driven analysis, there is still substantial work to be done to transition the majority of classrooms in the United States from a regimented, “kill-and-drill” pedagogy to something more inquiry oriented. Waring and Hartshorne’s Conducting Authentic Historical Inquiry: Engaging Learners with SOURCES and Emerging Technologies is a recent contribution to the continued advocacy within the educational academy toward empowerment of student learning within an inquiry-focused classroom. Waring and Hartshorne’s work is practitioneroriented and intended to promote the learning benefits of their SOURCES framework as part of a technology-supported approach to “build[ing] a more complex way of thinking and approaching historical content” (p. ix). In the book’s first half, the authors explain and apply their SOURCES analysis model in conjunction with four curated collections of primary sources. The book’s second half is devoted to identifying and explaining other technology resources that classroom practitioners might find helpful in their efforts to support historical inquiry in their classrooms. As a high school history teacher and PhD candidate who works with preservice social studies teachers, I came to Conducting Authentic Historical Inquiry excited to see where Waring and Hartshorne would join the ongoing conversations in the educational community surrounding inquiry in the contemporary classroom. Informed by my own professional experience, I was interested to see how this book might both inform my own instructional praxis as well as further my work with aspiring teachers as they build their own competencies around student inquiry. The authors situate the utility of a specific pedagogical framework (i.e., SOURCES) as a means for promoting student-driven critical inquiry. Throughout the work, the SOURCES model is featured as a means of encouraging a more in-depth understanding of the past via inquiry. Part I of the work is an extended discussion on defining and applying the various elements of the SOURCES analysis framework to specific historical figures and topics. The acronym is broken down in text as:","PeriodicalId":46808,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Research in Social Education","volume":"49 1","pages":"630 - 633"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00933104.2021.1890970","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Research in Social Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2021.1890970","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is no question that amidst an educational landscape with increasing emphasis on critical thinking and student-driven analysis, there is still substantial work to be done to transition the majority of classrooms in the United States from a regimented, “kill-and-drill” pedagogy to something more inquiry oriented. Waring and Hartshorne’s Conducting Authentic Historical Inquiry: Engaging Learners with SOURCES and Emerging Technologies is a recent contribution to the continued advocacy within the educational academy toward empowerment of student learning within an inquiry-focused classroom. Waring and Hartshorne’s work is practitioneroriented and intended to promote the learning benefits of their SOURCES framework as part of a technology-supported approach to “build[ing] a more complex way of thinking and approaching historical content” (p. ix). In the book’s first half, the authors explain and apply their SOURCES analysis model in conjunction with four curated collections of primary sources. The book’s second half is devoted to identifying and explaining other technology resources that classroom practitioners might find helpful in their efforts to support historical inquiry in their classrooms. As a high school history teacher and PhD candidate who works with preservice social studies teachers, I came to Conducting Authentic Historical Inquiry excited to see where Waring and Hartshorne would join the ongoing conversations in the educational community surrounding inquiry in the contemporary classroom. Informed by my own professional experience, I was interested to see how this book might both inform my own instructional praxis as well as further my work with aspiring teachers as they build their own competencies around student inquiry. The authors situate the utility of a specific pedagogical framework (i.e., SOURCES) as a means for promoting student-driven critical inquiry. Throughout the work, the SOURCES model is featured as a means of encouraging a more in-depth understanding of the past via inquiry. Part I of the work is an extended discussion on defining and applying the various elements of the SOURCES analysis framework to specific historical figures and topics. The acronym is broken down in text as:
数字时代鼓励探究
毫无疑问,在日益强调批判性思维和学生驱动的分析的教育环境中,要将美国的大多数课堂从严格的“扼杀和训练”教学法转变为更注重探究的教学法,仍有大量工作要做。Waring和Hartshorne的《进行真实的历史探究:让学习者参与资源和新兴技术》是对教育学院内持续倡导在以探究为重点的课堂中增强学生学习能力的最新贡献。Waring和Hartshorne的工作以实践为导向,旨在促进其SOURCES框架的学习效益,作为技术支持方法的一部分,以“建立更复杂的思维方式和处理历史内容”(第九页)。在本书的前半部分,作者解释并应用了他们的来源分析模型,以及四个精选的主要来源集。这本书的后半部分致力于确定和解释其他技术资源,课堂从业者可能会发现这些资源有助于他们在课堂上支持历史探究。作为一名高中历史教师和博士生,我与职前社会研究教师合作,来到“进行真实的历史调查”,很高兴看到Waring和Hartshorne将在哪里加入教育界围绕当代课堂调查的持续对话。根据我自己的专业经验,我很想看看这本书如何既能为我自己的教学实践提供信息,又能进一步推动我与有抱负的教师的合作,让他们围绕学生探究建立自己的能力。作者将特定教学框架(即来源)的效用定位为促进学生驱动的批判性探究的一种手段。在整个工作中,SOURCES模型是鼓励通过调查更深入地了解过去的一种手段。工作的第一部分是对SOURCES分析框架的各种元素的定义和应用于特定历史人物和主题的扩展讨论。首字母缩略词在文本中分解为:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Theory and Research in Social Education
Theory and Research in Social Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
30.80%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信