In/sufficiently able: how teachers differentiate between pupils in inclusive classrooms

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Thorsten Merl
{"title":"In/sufficiently able: how teachers differentiate between pupils in inclusive classrooms","authors":"Thorsten Merl","doi":"10.1080/17457823.2021.1871853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Due to the legal implementation of inclusion in the German school system, teachers face the challenge of implementing the joint learning of pupils with and without special educational needs in the classroom. But how do they do this? How do teachers differentiate between pupils in classroom practices and what differences do they produce throughout these practices? This article shows that teachers differentiate along the distinction of whether a pupil is (in the eyes of the teacher and in relation to the ability expectations) sufficiently or insufficiently able. It can be shown that this differentiation not only produces who is and who is not capable of acting accordingly, but also ensures membership for all pupils, because it allows the teachers to maintain the general ability expectations while at the same time reduce them for those that are deemed insufficiently able. Nevertheless, this leads to the re/production of disability in inclusive classes.","PeriodicalId":46203,"journal":{"name":"Ethnography and Education","volume":"16 1","pages":"198 - 209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17457823.2021.1871853","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnography and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2021.1871853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Due to the legal implementation of inclusion in the German school system, teachers face the challenge of implementing the joint learning of pupils with and without special educational needs in the classroom. But how do they do this? How do teachers differentiate between pupils in classroom practices and what differences do they produce throughout these practices? This article shows that teachers differentiate along the distinction of whether a pupil is (in the eyes of the teacher and in relation to the ability expectations) sufficiently or insufficiently able. It can be shown that this differentiation not only produces who is and who is not capable of acting accordingly, but also ensures membership for all pupils, because it allows the teachers to maintain the general ability expectations while at the same time reduce them for those that are deemed insufficiently able. Nevertheless, this leads to the re/production of disability in inclusive classes.
能力不足:教师如何在包容性课堂上区分学生
摘要由于德国学校系统中包容性的法律实施,教师面临着在课堂上实施有特殊教育需求和没有特殊教育需求的学生联合学习的挑战。但是他们是怎么做到的呢?教师如何在课堂实践中区分学生,以及他们在这些实践中产生了什么差异?这篇文章表明,教师根据学生(在教师眼中以及与能力期望有关)能力是否足够或不足的区别进行区分。可以表明,这种差异不仅产生了谁有能力和谁没有能力采取相应行动,而且还确保了所有学生的成员资格,因为它使教师能够保持普遍的能力期望,同时降低了那些被认为能力不足的学生的能力期望。尽管如此,这导致了包容阶层中残疾的重新产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethnography and Education
Ethnography and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Ethnography and Education is an international, peer-reviewed journal publishing articles that illuminate educational practices through empirical methodologies, which prioritise the experiences and perspectives of those involved. The journal is open to a wide range of ethnographic research that emanates from the perspectives of sociology, linguistics, history, psychology and general educational studies as well as anthropology. The journal’s priority is to support ethnographic research that involves long-term engagement with those studied in order to understand their cultures, uses multiple methods of generating data, and recognises the centrality of the researcher in the research process. The journal welcomes substantive and methodological articles that seek to explicate and challenge the effects of educational policies and practices; interrogate and develop theories about educational structures, policies and experiences; highlight the agency of educational actors; and provide accounts of how the everyday practices of those engaged in education are instrumental in social reproduction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信