An Exploration of Reflective Conversations in Early Intervention Caregiver Coaching Sessions

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Ciera M. Lorio, Juliann Woods, Patricia A. Snyder
{"title":"An Exploration of Reflective Conversations in Early Intervention Caregiver Coaching Sessions","authors":"Ciera M. Lorio, Juliann Woods, Patricia A. Snyder","doi":"10.1177/1053815121992132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This descriptive study included a systematic examination of provider and caregiver reflective conversations during caregiver coaching sessions focused on embedded intervention. Transcribed videos from 31 provider–caregiver dyads in two groups (Embedded Practices and Interventions with Caregivers [EPIC] vs. business-as-usual [BAU]) were used for data collection, resulting in a total of 93 transcripts across three different time points. Using methods of directed content analysis, a coding scheme describing various components of shared reflection was developed and used to code transcripts. Coding data were used to explore the rate per minute and relative frequency of types, topics, and spontaneity of reflection. Although there were no statistically significant differences in the frequency and rate of reflective versus nonreflective conversational turns, there were group differences in the reflective topics and specific types of reflective comments and questions posed by participants. Results from this study and others can help the field further define reflection as a coaching strategy and consider the potential utility of different reflective comment and question types to increase caregiver capacity to embed interventions in home routines. Further research is recommended to explicate further definitions and processes for reflection specific to caregiver coaching, including methods used to code reflective conversations and evaluate how reflection impacts caregivers’ intervention implementation.","PeriodicalId":47360,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Intervention","volume":"43 1","pages":"314 - 338"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1053815121992132","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Early Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815121992132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This descriptive study included a systematic examination of provider and caregiver reflective conversations during caregiver coaching sessions focused on embedded intervention. Transcribed videos from 31 provider–caregiver dyads in two groups (Embedded Practices and Interventions with Caregivers [EPIC] vs. business-as-usual [BAU]) were used for data collection, resulting in a total of 93 transcripts across three different time points. Using methods of directed content analysis, a coding scheme describing various components of shared reflection was developed and used to code transcripts. Coding data were used to explore the rate per minute and relative frequency of types, topics, and spontaneity of reflection. Although there were no statistically significant differences in the frequency and rate of reflective versus nonreflective conversational turns, there were group differences in the reflective topics and specific types of reflective comments and questions posed by participants. Results from this study and others can help the field further define reflection as a coaching strategy and consider the potential utility of different reflective comment and question types to increase caregiver capacity to embed interventions in home routines. Further research is recommended to explicate further definitions and processes for reflection specific to caregiver coaching, including methods used to code reflective conversations and evaluate how reflection impacts caregivers’ intervention implementation.
早期干预护理人员辅导中反思性对话的探索
这项描述性研究包括在专注于嵌入式干预的护理人员辅导会议期间,对提供者和护理人员的反思性对话进行系统检查。使用来自两组31个提供者-照顾者二人组的转录视频(与照顾者的嵌入式实践和干预[EPIC]与照常营业[BAU])进行数据收集,在三个不同的时间点共产生93个转录本。使用定向内容分析的方法,开发了一个描述共享反射的各种组成部分的编码方案,并用于编码转录本。编码数据用于探索每分钟的速率和类型、主题和反思自发性的相对频率。尽管在反思性和非反思性会话转向的频率和比率方面没有统计学上的显著差异,但在反思性话题以及参与者提出的反思性评论和问题的具体类型方面存在群体差异。这项研究和其他研究的结果可以帮助该领域进一步将反思定义为一种指导策略,并考虑不同反思性评论和问题类型的潜在效用,以提高护理人员在家庭日常生活中嵌入干预措施的能力。建议进行进一步的研究,以解释针对护理人员辅导的反思的进一步定义和过程,包括用于编码反思对话和评估反思如何影响护理人员干预实施的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Journal of Early Intervention (JEI) publishes articles related to research and practice in early intervention for infants and young children with special needs and their families. Early intervention is defined broadly as procedures that facilitate the development of infants and young children who have special needs or who are at risk for developmental disabilities. The childhood years in which early intervention might occur begin at birth, or before birth for some prevention programs, and extend through the years in which children traditionally begin elementary school.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信