{"title":"Empirische Arbeit: A non-randomized controlled effectiveness study of a smoking cessation intervention for adolescents","authors":"A. Bühler, Johannes Thrul, M. Goecke, A. Schmitt","doi":"10.2378/peu2020.art26e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite a remarkable decrease of smoking prevalence among German teenagers over the last 20 years, a substantial number of adolescents report current cigarette use, especially youth with low socioeconomic status. This study investigated the effectiveness of a school-based psychosocial adolescent smoking cessation intervention under real-world conditions.\nMethods: The intervention consisted of six sessions of school-based group counseling, using motivational enhancement and cognitive-behavioral content, along with 4 weeks of follow-up care by text messaging and phone calls. A total of 47 smoking cessation classes were implemented in secondary schools all over Germany. The intervention group (IG) consisted of 272 currently smoking students nested in 41 schools, and the control group (CG) comprised 240 currently smoking students nested in 10 schools. Assignment to IG and CG was non-randomized. Logistic regression analyses (complete case, intention to treat, and full-information-maximum-likelihood) were conducted to test group differences in past 30-day smoking abstinence at 6-month follow-up. Baseline differences between IG and CG and intraclass correlation were accounted for in the analyses.\nResults: There were no differences in school characteristics between IG and CG schools at baseline. At 6-month follow-up, the IG had a significantly higher abstinence rate than the CG (Intent-to-treat analysis: 14% IG vs. 5% CG; adjusted odds ratio=2.73; 95% confidence interval: 1.19–6.27). Results were consistent for complete case and full-information-maximum-likelihood analyses.\nConclusions: Results suggest that school-based psychosocial interventions can be feasible and effective for smoking cessation among adolescents in schools with a higher proportion of youth with low socioeconomic status.","PeriodicalId":44398,"journal":{"name":"Psychologie in Erziehung Und Unterricht","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologie in Erziehung Und Unterricht","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2378/peu2020.art26e","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite a remarkable decrease of smoking prevalence among German teenagers over the last 20 years, a substantial number of adolescents report current cigarette use, especially youth with low socioeconomic status. This study investigated the effectiveness of a school-based psychosocial adolescent smoking cessation intervention under real-world conditions.
Methods: The intervention consisted of six sessions of school-based group counseling, using motivational enhancement and cognitive-behavioral content, along with 4 weeks of follow-up care by text messaging and phone calls. A total of 47 smoking cessation classes were implemented in secondary schools all over Germany. The intervention group (IG) consisted of 272 currently smoking students nested in 41 schools, and the control group (CG) comprised 240 currently smoking students nested in 10 schools. Assignment to IG and CG was non-randomized. Logistic regression analyses (complete case, intention to treat, and full-information-maximum-likelihood) were conducted to test group differences in past 30-day smoking abstinence at 6-month follow-up. Baseline differences between IG and CG and intraclass correlation were accounted for in the analyses.
Results: There were no differences in school characteristics between IG and CG schools at baseline. At 6-month follow-up, the IG had a significantly higher abstinence rate than the CG (Intent-to-treat analysis: 14% IG vs. 5% CG; adjusted odds ratio=2.73; 95% confidence interval: 1.19–6.27). Results were consistent for complete case and full-information-maximum-likelihood analyses.
Conclusions: Results suggest that school-based psychosocial interventions can be feasible and effective for smoking cessation among adolescents in schools with a higher proportion of youth with low socioeconomic status.
尽管在过去20年里,德国青少年的吸烟率显著下降,但仍有相当数量的青少年报告目前吸烟,尤其是社会经济地位较低的青少年。本研究调查了在现实世界条件下以学校为基础的青少年社会心理戒烟干预的有效性。方法:干预包括6次以学校为基础的小组辅导,使用动机增强和认知行为内容,以及4周的短信和电话随访护理。德国各地的中学共开设了47个戒烟课程。干预组(IG)由42所学校的272名吸烟在校生组成,对照组(CG)由10所学校的240名吸烟在校生组成。IG和CG的分配是非随机的。采用Logistic回归分析(完整病例、治疗意向、全信息最大似然),在6个月的随访中检验各组在过去30天戒烟方面的差异。IG和CG的基线差异和类内相关性在分析中被考虑。结果:IG和CG学校在基线时的学校特征没有差异。在6个月的随访中,IG组的戒断率明显高于CG组(意向治疗分析:IG组14% vs CG组5%;调整优势比=2.73;95%置信区间:1.19-6.27)。完整病例和全信息最大似然分析的结果一致。结论:研究结果表明,在社会经济地位较低的青少年比例较高的学校中,以学校为基础的社会心理干预对于青少年戒烟是可行和有效的。