Victor Villarreal, Felicia Castro-Villarreal, Lisa S. Peterson, Madeleine Bear, D. M. Cortés, Tanya Escobedo
{"title":"Meta-Analysis of Proportions of Students Screened and Identified in Mental Health Multiple-Gate Screening Research","authors":"Victor Villarreal, Felicia Castro-Villarreal, Lisa S. Peterson, Madeleine Bear, D. M. Cortés, Tanya Escobedo","doi":"10.1080/2372966X.2022.2106155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We investigated characteristics of school-based mental health screening using multiple-gating (MG) approaches through a systematic review of the literature and proportional meta-analyses of screening participation and risk identification. The main analyses included 38 studies conducted in the United States. Pooled estimates indicate that approximately 72% of eligible students participated in initial screening, with 82% of eligible students participating in a second assessment. Approximately 24% of students participating in initial screening were identified as at-risk for mental health difficulties, with 65% identified at-risk in a second assessment. Participation rate was significantly associated with the type of consent process used, with participation rates of 55% and 58% in initial screening and a second assessment, respectively, for studies with active consent processes, and participation rates of 90% and 96% in initial screening and a second assessment, respectively, for studies with passive consent processes. Implications for future research and practice are provided. Impact Statement This study presents an initial review of school-based, multiple-gating (MG) mental health screening studies. Results indicate that low participation is a significant barrier to screening, which may influence the generalizability of research in this area. More inclusive practices are recommended, both to increase the number of students supported through screening and to improve research.","PeriodicalId":21555,"journal":{"name":"School Psychology Review","volume":"52 1","pages":"130 - 143"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2022.2106155","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract We investigated characteristics of school-based mental health screening using multiple-gating (MG) approaches through a systematic review of the literature and proportional meta-analyses of screening participation and risk identification. The main analyses included 38 studies conducted in the United States. Pooled estimates indicate that approximately 72% of eligible students participated in initial screening, with 82% of eligible students participating in a second assessment. Approximately 24% of students participating in initial screening were identified as at-risk for mental health difficulties, with 65% identified at-risk in a second assessment. Participation rate was significantly associated with the type of consent process used, with participation rates of 55% and 58% in initial screening and a second assessment, respectively, for studies with active consent processes, and participation rates of 90% and 96% in initial screening and a second assessment, respectively, for studies with passive consent processes. Implications for future research and practice are provided. Impact Statement This study presents an initial review of school-based, multiple-gating (MG) mental health screening studies. Results indicate that low participation is a significant barrier to screening, which may influence the generalizability of research in this area. More inclusive practices are recommended, both to increase the number of students supported through screening and to improve research.
期刊介绍:
School Psychology Review (SPR) is a refereed journal published quarterly by NASP. Its primary purpose is to provide a means for communicating scholarly advances in research, training, and practice related to psychology and education, and specifically to school psychology. Of particular interest are articles presenting original, data-based research that can contribute to the development of innovative intervention and prevention strategies and the evaluation of these approaches. SPR presents important conceptual developments and empirical findings from a wide range of disciplines (e.g., educational, child clinical, pediatric, community.