The relevance of the number of categories in the hedonic scale to the Ghanaian consumer in acceptance testing

Emmanuel Addo-Preko, J. Amissah, M. Adjei
{"title":"The relevance of the number of categories in the hedonic scale to the Ghanaian consumer in acceptance testing","authors":"Emmanuel Addo-Preko, J. Amissah, M. Adjei","doi":"10.3389/frfst.2023.1071216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 9-point hedonic scale is the most widely used scale for consumer acceptance testing globally. The scale has nine categories with verbal anchors which are converted to a numerical scale with numbers assigned at equal intervals so that the psychological distance between successive scale points is equal. The verbal cues and number of categories assigned to them may not be relevant for Ghanaian consumers based on cultural differences. Using bread as an example, we used a 3 × 4 factorial design for bread types and scaling categories, to determine the number of categories in a hedonic scale that would be appropriate for Ghanaian consumers to use in a consumer acceptance test. Three commonly consumed breads in Ghana, tea bread, butter bread, and sugar bread were used. The number of categories in the scales we tested were the traditional 9-point, and three truncations of it; 7-point, 5-point, and 3- point scales. Each scale had verbal cues and numbers based on the traditional 9-point scale. Assessors rated their degree of overall liking followed by the degree of liking for appearance, flavor and texture of each bread sample. They further ranked the breads for preference. Simple t-tests, Analysis of variance and ranked order analyses were used to determine differences in liking scores for the breads across the different scales used. Regardless of the number of categories in the scales used, the order for product liking and preference rank order were the same; sugar bread > butter bread > tea bread. Attentiveness to the task of scoring the degree of liking was an important factor that impacted how the different scale lengths were used. When assessors are attentive to changes in scale length, they adjust their scores to fit the scale length and thus the number of categories in the scale length does not affect the acceptance score. The choice of scale length to use should be considered carefully in a consumer acceptance test.","PeriodicalId":93753,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in food science and technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in food science and technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frfst.2023.1071216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 9-point hedonic scale is the most widely used scale for consumer acceptance testing globally. The scale has nine categories with verbal anchors which are converted to a numerical scale with numbers assigned at equal intervals so that the psychological distance between successive scale points is equal. The verbal cues and number of categories assigned to them may not be relevant for Ghanaian consumers based on cultural differences. Using bread as an example, we used a 3 × 4 factorial design for bread types and scaling categories, to determine the number of categories in a hedonic scale that would be appropriate for Ghanaian consumers to use in a consumer acceptance test. Three commonly consumed breads in Ghana, tea bread, butter bread, and sugar bread were used. The number of categories in the scales we tested were the traditional 9-point, and three truncations of it; 7-point, 5-point, and 3- point scales. Each scale had verbal cues and numbers based on the traditional 9-point scale. Assessors rated their degree of overall liking followed by the degree of liking for appearance, flavor and texture of each bread sample. They further ranked the breads for preference. Simple t-tests, Analysis of variance and ranked order analyses were used to determine differences in liking scores for the breads across the different scales used. Regardless of the number of categories in the scales used, the order for product liking and preference rank order were the same; sugar bread > butter bread > tea bread. Attentiveness to the task of scoring the degree of liking was an important factor that impacted how the different scale lengths were used. When assessors are attentive to changes in scale length, they adjust their scores to fit the scale length and thus the number of categories in the scale length does not affect the acceptance score. The choice of scale length to use should be considered carefully in a consumer acceptance test.
在接受测试中,享乐量表中类别数量与加纳消费者的相关性
9分享乐量表是全球范围内使用最广泛的消费者接受度测试量表。量表有九个类别,其中有语言锚点,它们被转换成一个数字量表,以相等的间隔分配数字,以便连续量表点之间的心理距离相等。基于文化差异,分配给他们的口头线索和类别数量可能与加纳消费者无关。以面包为例,我们对面包类型和缩放类别使用了3 × 4的析因设计,以确定适合加纳消费者在消费者接受测试中使用的享乐尺度中的类别数量。使用了加纳常见的三种面包:茶面包、黄油面包和糖面包。在我们测试的量表中,类别的数量是传统的9点,以及它的三个截断;7分,5分,3分。每个量表都有口头暗示和基于传统9分制的数字。评估者对每个面包样品的外观、味道和质地进行了评分,然后对他们的总体喜欢程度进行了评分。他们进一步对面包进行了偏好排序。使用简单的t检验、方差分析和排序分析来确定在不同使用的量表上对面包的喜欢分数的差异。无论使用的量表中有多少个类别,产品喜欢的顺序和偏好等级顺序都是相同的;糖面包,黄油面包,茶面包。对喜欢程度评分任务的关注是影响如何使用不同尺度长度的一个重要因素。当评估者注意到量表长度的变化时,他们会调整分数以适应量表长度,因此量表长度中的类别数量不会影响接受分数。在消费者接受测试中,应该仔细考虑刻度长度的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信