Book reviews: Lauren Bialystok and Lisa M. F. Andersen, Touchy Subject: The History and Philosophy of Sex Education

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Emily Y. Tran
{"title":"Book reviews: Lauren Bialystok and Lisa M. F. Andersen, Touchy Subject: The History and Philosophy of Sex Education","authors":"Emily Y. Tran","doi":"10.1177/14778785231187197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"curtailed by court cases in the name of preventing a disruptive learning environment (pp. 92–95). This is clearly part of the problem. The concrete recommendations in the final chapter are perhaps the most illuminating and practically useful part of the book. Here, Ben-Porath offers detailed guidance for students, faculty, staff, and administrators. Students need to be willing to collaborate across identity groups, and administrators can incentivize this collaboration by sponsoring social events between groups typically at odds (p. 151). Campus events can employ ‘free speech observers’, individuals trained in university speech policies who can intervene when necessary to ensure the speech rights of all relevant parties are honored, protestors and speakers alike (pp. 145–146). Faculty can be more deliberate about courting controversy in the classroom, constructing lesson plans with more care and attention to the issues (pp. 147–151). Her tips are applicable, actionable, and ethically wise. The bottom line is that we find ourselves in a world historic crisis of distrust, disinformation, and polarization. Cancel Wars is the kind of book we need to help manage that crisis. Ben-Porath makes a strong case that the university should serve as a beacon in these troubling times – a facilitator of knowledge, speech, inclusion, and trust.","PeriodicalId":46679,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Research in Education","volume":"21 1","pages":"234 - 237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14778785231187197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

curtailed by court cases in the name of preventing a disruptive learning environment (pp. 92–95). This is clearly part of the problem. The concrete recommendations in the final chapter are perhaps the most illuminating and practically useful part of the book. Here, Ben-Porath offers detailed guidance for students, faculty, staff, and administrators. Students need to be willing to collaborate across identity groups, and administrators can incentivize this collaboration by sponsoring social events between groups typically at odds (p. 151). Campus events can employ ‘free speech observers’, individuals trained in university speech policies who can intervene when necessary to ensure the speech rights of all relevant parties are honored, protestors and speakers alike (pp. 145–146). Faculty can be more deliberate about courting controversy in the classroom, constructing lesson plans with more care and attention to the issues (pp. 147–151). Her tips are applicable, actionable, and ethically wise. The bottom line is that we find ourselves in a world historic crisis of distrust, disinformation, and polarization. Cancel Wars is the kind of book we need to help manage that crisis. Ben-Porath makes a strong case that the university should serve as a beacon in these troubling times – a facilitator of knowledge, speech, inclusion, and trust.
书评:劳伦·比亚韦斯托克和丽莎·m·f·安德森,《敏感话题:性教育的历史和哲学》
以防止破坏性学习环境的名义受到法庭案件的限制(第92–95页)。这显然是问题的一部分。最后一章中的具体建议可能是本书最具启发性和实用性的部分。在这里,Ben Porath为学生、教职员工和管理人员提供详细的指导。学生需要愿意跨身份群体进行合作,管理人员可以通过赞助通常不一致的群体之间的社交活动来激励这种合作(第151页)。校园活动可以雇佣“言论自由观察员”,即受过大学言论政策培训的个人,他们可以在必要时进行干预,以确保所有相关方的言论权利得到尊重,抗议者和演讲者都是如此(第145-146页)。教师可以更慎重地在课堂上引发争议,制定更关心和关注问题的课程计划(第147-151页)。她的建议是适用的,可操作的,合乎道德的。底线是,我们发现自己正处于一场不信任、虚假信息和两极分化的世界历史性危机中。《取消战争》是我们需要帮助管理这场危机的一本书。Ben Porath提出了一个强有力的理由,即大学应该在这个动荡的时代充当灯塔——知识、言论、包容和信任的促进者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Theory and Research in Education
Theory and Research in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Theory and Research in Education, formerly known as The School Field, is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes theoretical, empirical and conjectural papers contributing to the development of educational theory, policy and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信